The role of minor lymph node basins for malignant melanoma of the distal extremities–A meta-analysis

Grant Coleman, Matthew Gowell, Mohamed Maher, Darren Chester
{"title":"The role of minor lymph node basins for malignant melanoma of the distal extremities–A meta-analysis","authors":"Grant Coleman,&nbsp;Matthew Gowell,&nbsp;Mohamed Maher,&nbsp;Darren Chester","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcskn.2024.100270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In melanoma, nodal status of major lymph node basins are commonly assessed; however, minor lymph node basins (epitrochlear and popliteal regions) are often overlooked. Significant variability in reported incidences of lymphatic drainage and metastasis to these areas exists. By systematically reviewing existing literature and examining studies specifically focusing on the distal extremity, we review the rates of drainage and metastasis to these lesser studied regions and assess the implications for routine clinical examination and care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating outcomes of SLNB and clinical metastasis to minor node basins in distal extremity melanoma. PUBMED, EMBASE and COCRANE databases were searched. The primary outcome measure was the location of sentinel node at SLNB. The secondary outcome measures were the rates of micro and macro metastasis. Data synthesis was conducted using the Stuart—Ord method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>259 articles were screened and 50 examined in detail. 10 studies were identified as suitable for synthesis of data, representing 7346 distal extremity melanomas. Pooled proportion of drainage to epitrochlear and popliteal nodes on SLNB were 0.14 and 0.09 and respectively. Rates of positive nodes at SLNB were equivalent to major lymph node basins.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In any distal extremity, there is approximately a 1 in 10 chance of melanomas primarily draining to a minor nodal basin. In the upper extremity, this is higher at approximately 1 in 7. Risk of metastasis is equivalent to that of a major lymph node basins. We propose that clinical examination of minor nodal basins, in addition to performing SPECT-CT lymphoscintigraphy and inclusion of minor basins in ultrasongography, be employed to better detect micro and macrometastasis to these regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100396,"journal":{"name":"EJC Skin Cancer","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC Skin Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772611824002581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In melanoma, nodal status of major lymph node basins are commonly assessed; however, minor lymph node basins (epitrochlear and popliteal regions) are often overlooked. Significant variability in reported incidences of lymphatic drainage and metastasis to these areas exists. By systematically reviewing existing literature and examining studies specifically focusing on the distal extremity, we review the rates of drainage and metastasis to these lesser studied regions and assess the implications for routine clinical examination and care.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating outcomes of SLNB and clinical metastasis to minor node basins in distal extremity melanoma. PUBMED, EMBASE and COCRANE databases were searched. The primary outcome measure was the location of sentinel node at SLNB. The secondary outcome measures were the rates of micro and macro metastasis. Data synthesis was conducted using the Stuart—Ord method.

Results

259 articles were screened and 50 examined in detail. 10 studies were identified as suitable for synthesis of data, representing 7346 distal extremity melanomas. Pooled proportion of drainage to epitrochlear and popliteal nodes on SLNB were 0.14 and 0.09 and respectively. Rates of positive nodes at SLNB were equivalent to major lymph node basins.

Conclusions

In any distal extremity, there is approximately a 1 in 10 chance of melanomas primarily draining to a minor nodal basin. In the upper extremity, this is higher at approximately 1 in 7. Risk of metastasis is equivalent to that of a major lymph node basins. We propose that clinical examination of minor nodal basins, in addition to performing SPECT-CT lymphoscintigraphy and inclusion of minor basins in ultrasongography, be employed to better detect micro and macrometastasis to these regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肢体远端恶性黑色素瘤小淋巴结基底的作用--荟萃分析
背景在黑色素瘤中,主要淋巴结基底的结节状态通常会被评估;但是,次要淋巴结基底(外踝和腘窝区域)往往被忽视。据报道,这些区域的淋巴引流和转移发生率存在很大差异。通过系统回顾现有文献并检查专门针对肢体远端进行的研究,我们回顾了这些研究较少的区域的引流和转移率,并评估了其对常规临床检查和护理的影响。方法进行文献检索,以确定评估肢体远端黑色素瘤小结节盆地 SLNB 结果和临床转移的研究。检索了 PUBMED、EMBASE 和 COCRANE 数据库。主要结果指标是 SLNB 时前哨节点的位置。次要结果指标是微转移率和大转移率。结果 筛选出 259 篇文章,详细审查了 50 篇。最终确定10项研究适合进行数据综合,这些研究代表了7346例远端肢体黑色素瘤。SLNB引流至外侧结节和腘结节的总比例分别为0.14和0.09。结论在任何肢体远端,黑色素瘤主要引流至小结节盆地的几率约为十分之一。在上肢,这一比例更高,约为七分之一。转移风险与主要淋巴结基底部的风险相当。我们建议,除了进行SPECT-CT淋巴管造影检查和将小结节盆地纳入超声波造影检查外,还应对小结节盆地进行临床检查,以便更好地发现这些区域的微转移和大转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neonatal melanoma with lymph node metastasis Italian expert opinion on the treatment of mycosis fungoides with chlormethine gel: Results of a Delphi consensus Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy for acral and mucosal melanoma Patterns of systemic treatment for melanoma: An insight on trends and costs between 2019–2023 from the English systemic anti-cancer therapy national database Selecting first-line immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: Current evidence on efficacy across diverse patient populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1