The COVID-19 pandemic: A focusing event to promote domestic investment for health systems strengthening in the WHO African Region

SSM - Health Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100034
Alison T. Mhazo , Arush Lal , Elias Mossialos
{"title":"The COVID-19 pandemic: A focusing event to promote domestic investment for health systems strengthening in the WHO African Region","authors":"Alison T. Mhazo ,&nbsp;Arush Lal ,&nbsp;Elias Mossialos","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has been framed as a catalytic occurrence that exposed the chronic underinvestment in health systems strengthening (HSS) in the WHO African Region as well as its potential to galvanize much-needed political attention towards the issue. This expectation aligns with the portrayal of COVID-19 as a ‘focusing event’ for HSS. This study analyzes whether COVID-19 met the criteria of a focusing event for HSS as set forth by John Kingdon, and then, if as a focusing event, it generated political attention towards policy making and implementation for HSS and whether there could be prospects for sustaining such momentum in the post COVID-19 era.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We carried out a scoping review of available literature using the O’Malley and Arksey method (2005).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented crisis that drew attention to the problem of weak health systems in the WHO African region, a problem that had long been acknowledged but largely ignored. This study has also shown that COVID-19 had a profound personal experience on policy makers since it severely limited their opportunity to seek medical care abroad and forced them to personally witness the weak state of domestic health systems. These attributes suit the criteria of COVID-19 as a focusing event according to Kingdon, which helped to stimulate governmental action on HSS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic can indeed be leveraged as a salient focusing event to generate political attention for HSS in the WHO African Region. However, such attention cannot be guaranteed in the long-term, due to the differential dynamics between policy making and implementation in crises and non-crisis situations. By casting light on a plausible but rarely examined mechanism for driving policy change –the personal experience of policy makers, we conclude that lack of financial resources does not sufficiently explain the lack of domestic investments for HSS. This calls for attention towards other reasons of inaction towards HSS, including the insulation of the elite from facing the weak health systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100034"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856224000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has been framed as a catalytic occurrence that exposed the chronic underinvestment in health systems strengthening (HSS) in the WHO African Region as well as its potential to galvanize much-needed political attention towards the issue. This expectation aligns with the portrayal of COVID-19 as a ‘focusing event’ for HSS. This study analyzes whether COVID-19 met the criteria of a focusing event for HSS as set forth by John Kingdon, and then, if as a focusing event, it generated political attention towards policy making and implementation for HSS and whether there could be prospects for sustaining such momentum in the post COVID-19 era.

Methods

We carried out a scoping review of available literature using the O’Malley and Arksey method (2005).

Results

The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented crisis that drew attention to the problem of weak health systems in the WHO African region, a problem that had long been acknowledged but largely ignored. This study has also shown that COVID-19 had a profound personal experience on policy makers since it severely limited their opportunity to seek medical care abroad and forced them to personally witness the weak state of domestic health systems. These attributes suit the criteria of COVID-19 as a focusing event according to Kingdon, which helped to stimulate governmental action on HSS.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic can indeed be leveraged as a salient focusing event to generate political attention for HSS in the WHO African Region. However, such attention cannot be guaranteed in the long-term, due to the differential dynamics between policy making and implementation in crises and non-crisis situations. By casting light on a plausible but rarely examined mechanism for driving policy change –the personal experience of policy makers, we conclude that lack of financial resources does not sufficiently explain the lack of domestic investments for HSS. This calls for attention towards other reasons of inaction towards HSS, including the insulation of the elite from facing the weak health systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行:促进国内投资以加强世卫组织非洲地区卫生系统的重点活动
背景 COVID-19 大流行被认为是一种催化剂,它暴露了世卫组织非洲地区在加强卫生系统(HSS)方面长期投资不足的问题,并有可能激发对这一问题亟需的政治关注。这一预期与 COVID-19 被描述为卫生系统强化的 "焦点事件 "相吻合。本研究分析了 COVID-19 是否符合 John Kingdon 提出的人文社科焦点事件的标准,以及作为焦点事件,COVID-19 是否引发了对人文社科政策制定和实施的政治关注,以及在 COVID-19 之后是否有可能保持这种势头。方法我们采用 O'Malley 和 Arksey 方法(2005 年)对现有文献进行了范围审查。结果COVID-19 大流行带来了一场前所未有的危机,引起了人们对世界卫生组织非洲地区卫生系统薄弱问题的关注,这一问题长期以来一直被人们所承认,但在很大程度上却被忽视。本研究还表明,COVID-19 给决策者带来了深刻的个人体验,因为它严重限制了他们出国就医的机会,迫使他们亲眼目睹了国内卫生系统的薄弱状况。根据 Kingdon 的观点,这些特征符合 COVID-19 作为焦点事件的标准,它有助于激发政府在人文社科领域采取行动。然而,由于危机和非危机情况下政策制定和实施的动态不同,这种关注不能得到长期保证。通过揭示一个看似合理但却很少被研究的推动政策变化的机制--政策制定者的个人经历,我们得出结论,缺乏财政资源并不能充分解释国内缺乏对人文社科投资的原因。这就需要关注对卫生和社会服务不作为的其他原因,包括精英阶层不愿面对薄弱的卫生系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenging gender norms through participatory action research: A cross-country study of women close-to-community healthcare providers in fragile settings Co-developing Canadian hospital research tracking criteria: Findings from a National Consensus Building Meeting using the nominal group technique Assessing clinical networks through evidence: an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of cancer networks in improving patients’ quality of care and survival Breaking barriers to access to sexual and reproductive health for migrant women in Castel Volturno, Italy: Combining a public health with an anthropological perspective Early identification and referral of children with disabilities in Mainland Tanzania: A qualitative study using the system level analysis approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1