Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade

Betelhem W. Demeke , Lokendra S. Rathore , Mesfin M. Mekonnen , Wenfeng Liu
{"title":"Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade","authors":"Betelhem W. Demeke ,&nbsp;Lokendra S. Rathore ,&nbsp;Mesfin M. Mekonnen ,&nbsp;Wenfeng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cotton, the world's most widely cultivated fiber crop, is associated with a multitude of environmental impacts, particularly the intensive use of water resources. While previous studies have assessed cotton's water usage through the water footprint concept, they largely focused on spatial variability, leaving temporal dynamics and the issue of unsustainable water use underexplored. This global study addressed these gaps by examining both the spatial and temporal variability of cotton's water footprint and assessing the unsustainable water footprint over time. Additionally, it explored the potential of flax as a water-efficient alternative for fiber production. Using a global gridded crop model, the study simulated yield and water use of flax and cotton from 1972 to 2018 at 30 arcmin resolution. The results showed that the global average blue, green, and total water footprint of cotton decreased by 37%, 48%, and 43%, respectively, due to yield improvements driven by improved crop cultivars, fertilizers, and better water management practices, with climate playing a minor role in these reductions. Despite this, the total water footprint of cotton production increased by 5%, with the blue water footprint rising by 17%. Additionally, unsustainable blue water usage in cotton cultivation increased from 59.3 km³/y to 70.9 km³/y between 1972-1976 and 2014–2018, with 71.1% of the unsustainable water traded virtually. USA, Pakistan, and India accounted for over 60% of this unsustainable virtual water trade. Flax, with its substantially lower water footprint, emerged as a promising alternative to reduce water consumption in fiber production. These findings offer critical insights for formulating strategies to mitigate unsustainable water use in global fiber production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791624000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cotton, the world's most widely cultivated fiber crop, is associated with a multitude of environmental impacts, particularly the intensive use of water resources. While previous studies have assessed cotton's water usage through the water footprint concept, they largely focused on spatial variability, leaving temporal dynamics and the issue of unsustainable water use underexplored. This global study addressed these gaps by examining both the spatial and temporal variability of cotton's water footprint and assessing the unsustainable water footprint over time. Additionally, it explored the potential of flax as a water-efficient alternative for fiber production. Using a global gridded crop model, the study simulated yield and water use of flax and cotton from 1972 to 2018 at 30 arcmin resolution. The results showed that the global average blue, green, and total water footprint of cotton decreased by 37%, 48%, and 43%, respectively, due to yield improvements driven by improved crop cultivars, fertilizers, and better water management practices, with climate playing a minor role in these reductions. Despite this, the total water footprint of cotton production increased by 5%, with the blue water footprint rising by 17%. Additionally, unsustainable blue water usage in cotton cultivation increased from 59.3 km³/y to 70.9 km³/y between 1972-1976 and 2014–2018, with 71.1% of the unsustainable water traded virtually. USA, Pakistan, and India accounted for over 60% of this unsustainable virtual water trade. Flax, with its substantially lower water footprint, emerged as a promising alternative to reduce water consumption in fiber production. These findings offer critical insights for formulating strategies to mitigate unsustainable water use in global fiber production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球棉花生产和贸易中水足迹和虚拟水贸易的时空动态变化
棉花是世界上种植面积最广的纤维作物,对环境造成了诸多影响,尤其是对水资源的大量使用。虽然以往的研究通过水足迹概念评估了棉花的用水量,但这些研究主要侧重于空间变化,而对时间动态和不可持续的用水问题则未作深入探讨。这项全球研究通过考察棉花水足迹的空间和时间变化以及评估不可持续的水足迹,弥补了这些不足。此外,研究还探讨了亚麻作为一种节水型纤维生产替代品的潜力。该研究利用全球网格作物模型,以 30 弧分的分辨率模拟了 1972 年至 2018 年亚麻和棉花的产量和用水量。结果显示,由于改良作物栽培品种、肥料和更好的水资源管理措施提高了产量,棉花的全球平均蓝色、绿色和总水足迹分别减少了37%、48%和43%,而气候在这些减少中的作用较小。尽管如此,棉花生产的总水足迹还是增加了 5%,其中蓝水足迹增加了 17%。此外,1972-1976 年和 2014-2018 年间,棉花种植中不可持续的蓝水使用量从 59.3 千米³/年增加到 70.9 千米³/年,71.1% 的不可持续水是通过虚拟交易获得的。在这些不可持续的虚拟水交易中,美国、巴基斯坦和印度占了 60% 以上。亚麻的水足迹较低,是纤维生产中减少水消耗的一种有前途的替代品。这些发现为制定减少全球纤维生产中不可持续用水的战略提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive analysis of sustainable fertilizer-related publications within the context of circular economy: Insights from the field of business management Strategic marketing of sustainable fashion: Exploring approaches and contradictions in the positioning of fashion rental Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade Consumers perspectives on biobased products: A scoping review Adopting a green strategy and related practices: Lessons from small food establishments in an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1