An acceptability and feasibility investigation of a community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102495
Lee Svensson , Michalis Stylianou , Jessica Hill , Stewart G. Trost , John Cairney
{"title":"An acceptability and feasibility investigation of a community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs","authors":"Lee Svensson ,&nbsp;Michalis Stylianou ,&nbsp;Jessica Hill ,&nbsp;Stewart G. Trost ,&nbsp;John Cairney","doi":"10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>General motor impairments are ubiquitous in Autism and are positively correlated with autism symptom severity. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a 13-week community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs (MHS).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this exploratory single arm within-subject study, 10 autistic children with MHS, ages 4–10 years, completed a community-based motor program delivered in a one-on-one format by therapists. Feasibility was determined through recruitment, retention, attendance, enjoyment, engagement and useability of motor, physical activity (PA), and behavioural assessment tools. Thematic analysis evaluated post-intervention semi-structured parent interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High program attendance and retention were demonstrated, and therapists reported child engagement and enjoyment were high. Identified themes revealed parents perceived unexpected substantial positive impacts including improvements in social, motor, and behavioural outcomes. They highly valued both the program and the therapeutic relationships fostered within it. Although parents of the children with the higher support needs reported the most substantial improvements, these children were unable to score on motor assessments due to difficulties following instructions and off-task behaviours. Additionally, only four participants wore an accelerometer-based PA monitor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This community-based motor program was considered feasible and acceptable by the children’s parents, and qualitative findings provided valuable insights into clinical practice for children with MHS. However, recruitment challenges and assessment tools being unfeasible for children with higher support needs led to low participant numbers. Future evaluations should explore alternative assessment measures and study designs, given the challenges associated with studying such a heterogenous and complex group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48255,"journal":{"name":"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946724001703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

General motor impairments are ubiquitous in Autism and are positively correlated with autism symptom severity. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a 13-week community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs (MHS).

Method

In this exploratory single arm within-subject study, 10 autistic children with MHS, ages 4–10 years, completed a community-based motor program delivered in a one-on-one format by therapists. Feasibility was determined through recruitment, retention, attendance, enjoyment, engagement and useability of motor, physical activity (PA), and behavioural assessment tools. Thematic analysis evaluated post-intervention semi-structured parent interviews.

Results

High program attendance and retention were demonstrated, and therapists reported child engagement and enjoyment were high. Identified themes revealed parents perceived unexpected substantial positive impacts including improvements in social, motor, and behavioural outcomes. They highly valued both the program and the therapeutic relationships fostered within it. Although parents of the children with the higher support needs reported the most substantial improvements, these children were unable to score on motor assessments due to difficulties following instructions and off-task behaviours. Additionally, only four participants wore an accelerometer-based PA monitor.

Conclusions

This community-based motor program was considered feasible and acceptable by the children’s parents, and qualitative findings provided valuable insights into clinical practice for children with MHS. However, recruitment challenges and assessment tools being unfeasible for children with higher support needs led to low participant numbers. Future evaluations should explore alternative assessment measures and study designs, given the challenges associated with studying such a heterogenous and complex group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对有中度和高度支持需求的自闭症儿童的社区运动计划的可接受性和可行性调查
背景一般运动障碍在自闭症中普遍存在,并且与自闭症症状的严重程度呈正相关。在这项探索性的单臂受试者内研究中,10 名患有自闭症的 4-10 岁自闭症儿童完成了由治疗师以一对一形式提供的社区运动项目。研究通过运动、体育活动(PA)和行为评估工具的招募、保留、出勤率、乐趣、参与度和可用性来确定其可行性。主题分析对干预后的半结构化家长访谈进行了评估。结果显示,项目的出勤率和保留率都很高,治疗师报告称儿童的参与度和喜爱度也很高。已确定的主题显示,家长们认为该计划带来了意想不到的实质性积极影响,包括社交、运动和行为结果的改善。他们高度评价了该项目及其中培养的治疗关系。虽然需要更多支持的儿童的家长表示他们的孩子得到了最显著的改善,但这些儿童由于难以听从指令和出现任务外行为,无法在运动评估中得分。此外,只有四名参与者佩戴了基于加速度计的 PA 监测器。结论这项基于社区的运动计划被儿童家长认为是可行且可接受的,定性研究结果为马铃薯综合症儿童的临床实践提供了宝贵的见解。然而,招募方面的挑战和评估工具对于需要更多支持的儿童来说不可行,导致参与人数较少。鉴于研究这样一个异质性复杂群体所面临的挑战,未来的评估应探索其他评估措施和研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders (RASD) publishes high quality empirical articles and reviews that contribute to a better understanding of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) at all levels of description; genetic, neurobiological, cognitive, and behavioral. The primary focus of the journal is to bridge the gap between basic research at these levels, and the practical questions and difficulties that are faced by individuals with ASD and their families, as well as carers, educators and clinicians. In addition, the journal encourages submissions on topics that remain under-researched in the field. We know shamefully little about the causes and consequences of the significant language and general intellectual impairments that characterize half of all individuals with ASD. We know even less about the challenges that women with ASD face and less still about the needs of individuals with ASD as they grow older. Medical and psychological co-morbidities and the complications they bring with them for the diagnosis and treatment of ASD represents another area of relatively little research. At RASD we are committed to promoting high-quality and rigorous research on all of these issues, and we look forward to receiving many excellent submissions.
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality educational scenarios for students with ASD: Instruments validation and design of STEM programmatic contents The BTBR T+ Itpr3tf/J mouse strain as a model to study the genetic, immune, and metabolic origins of neurodevelopmental disorders Which emerging autism features at 12 months of age are associated with later parent-child interaction? Brief report: Social relationships among autistic young adults with varying cognitive abilities Skill-based treatment for challenging behavior in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review of treatment characteristics and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1