Opportunities and obstacles: Using profile analysis to examine sources of reading self-efficacy in early adolescence

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102573
Jaeyun Han , Pilvi Peura , Calah J. Ford , Amanda R. Butz , Ellen L. Usher
{"title":"Opportunities and obstacles: Using profile analysis to examine sources of reading self-efficacy in early adolescence","authors":"Jaeyun Han ,&nbsp;Pilvi Peura ,&nbsp;Calah J. Ford ,&nbsp;Amanda R. Butz ,&nbsp;Ellen L. Usher","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When investigating the sources of self-efficacy, researchers have historically focused on learners' perceptions of positive (e.g., direct &amp; vicarious successes, encouragement &amp; praise) and negative (e.g., stress, anxiety) experiences. These approaches may not capture other types of efficacy-relevant experiences. The purpose of this study was to investigate how early adolescent readers perceive and integrate diverse types of efficacy-relevant information. Students (<em>N</em> = 1804) responded to items related to four hypothesized sources of self-efficacy that reflected opportunities and obstacles in reading. Latent profile analysis indicated four profiles related to students' efficacy-relevant reading experiences. These profiles were examined in relation to students' gender, socioeconomic status, grade level, and race/ethnicity. Students exposed to mostly positive sources of information showed higher levels of reading self-efficacy and reading achievement than those reporting more exposure to negative sources of information. Results highlight the importance of providing opportunities and minimizing obstacles to support adolescents' reading self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When investigating the sources of self-efficacy, researchers have historically focused on learners' perceptions of positive (e.g., direct & vicarious successes, encouragement & praise) and negative (e.g., stress, anxiety) experiences. These approaches may not capture other types of efficacy-relevant experiences. The purpose of this study was to investigate how early adolescent readers perceive and integrate diverse types of efficacy-relevant information. Students (N = 1804) responded to items related to four hypothesized sources of self-efficacy that reflected opportunities and obstacles in reading. Latent profile analysis indicated four profiles related to students' efficacy-relevant reading experiences. These profiles were examined in relation to students' gender, socioeconomic status, grade level, and race/ethnicity. Students exposed to mostly positive sources of information showed higher levels of reading self-efficacy and reading achievement than those reporting more exposure to negative sources of information. Results highlight the importance of providing opportunities and minimizing obstacles to support adolescents' reading self-efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机遇与障碍:利用特征分析研究青少年早期阅读自我效能感的来源
在研究自我效能感的来源时,研究人员历来侧重于学习者对积极(如直接&;替代成功、鼓励&;表扬)和消极(如压力、焦虑)体验的感知。这些方法可能无法捕捉到其他类型的与效率相关的体验。本研究旨在调查青少年早期读者如何感知和整合不同类型的效率相关信息。学生(人数 = 1804)回答了与四种自我效能感假设来源相关的项目,这些假设来源反映了阅读中的机会和障碍。潜特征分析表明,有四种特征与学生与效率相关的阅读经验有关。这些特征与学生的性别、社会经济地位、年级和种族/民族有关。与较多接触负面信息源的学生相比,接触正面信息源的学生显示出更高的阅读自我效能感和阅读成就。研究结果凸显了提供机会和减少障碍对提高青少年阅读自我效能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Latent profiles of Chinese students' social-emotional learning competencies and their associations with academic motivation and achievement Testing the generalizability of the multiplicative effects of expectancy and value across different ages, genders, and races Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents Parents' implicit intelligence beliefs about children's intelligence: Implications for children's academic self-concept and achievement in Maths, English, and French Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1