Hybrid manufacturing cost models: Additive friction stir deposition, measurement, and CNC machining

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.038
Nathan Wilson , Robert Patterson , Elijah Charles , Malachi Landis , Joshua Kincaid , Ryan Garcia , Gregory Corson , Tony Schmitz
{"title":"Hybrid manufacturing cost models: Additive friction stir deposition, measurement, and CNC machining","authors":"Nathan Wilson ,&nbsp;Robert Patterson ,&nbsp;Elijah Charles ,&nbsp;Malachi Landis ,&nbsp;Joshua Kincaid ,&nbsp;Ryan Garcia ,&nbsp;Gregory Corson ,&nbsp;Tony Schmitz","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on its potential to reduce lead times, hybrid manufacturing, which often includes both additive manufacturing and machining processes, is receiving more attention from manufacturers as they seek to increase their supply chain resilience and efficiency. A new solid-state additive manufacturing, referred to as additive friction stir deposition (AFSD), has shown the potential to become an important process for hybrid manufacturing. To justify the selection of a hybrid manufacturing approach, the cost needs to be estimated for comparison to conventional approaches. Historically, hybrid manufacturing costs have been difficult to estimate due to the complexity and diversity of the manufacturing processes. This paper proposes cost models that include additive friction stir deposition, structured light scanning, milling, and turning, which can be combined in hybrid manufacturing process planning. These cost models are demonstrated in a case study and cost estimates are compared for hybrid and conventional (machining-only) manufacturing approaches. For the selected case, the hybrid manufacturing process cost was $1007.58, while the conventional milling process cost was $833.60. The results of the case study show that both labor and material costs must be considered to make an informed decision between hybrid and conventional manufacturing approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 320-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on its potential to reduce lead times, hybrid manufacturing, which often includes both additive manufacturing and machining processes, is receiving more attention from manufacturers as they seek to increase their supply chain resilience and efficiency. A new solid-state additive manufacturing, referred to as additive friction stir deposition (AFSD), has shown the potential to become an important process for hybrid manufacturing. To justify the selection of a hybrid manufacturing approach, the cost needs to be estimated for comparison to conventional approaches. Historically, hybrid manufacturing costs have been difficult to estimate due to the complexity and diversity of the manufacturing processes. This paper proposes cost models that include additive friction stir deposition, structured light scanning, milling, and turning, which can be combined in hybrid manufacturing process planning. These cost models are demonstrated in a case study and cost estimates are compared for hybrid and conventional (machining-only) manufacturing approaches. For the selected case, the hybrid manufacturing process cost was $1007.58, while the conventional milling process cost was $833.60. The results of the case study show that both labor and material costs must be considered to make an informed decision between hybrid and conventional manufacturing approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合制造成本模型:快速摩擦搅拌沉积、测量和数控加工
混合制造(通常包括快速成型制造和机械加工工艺)具有缩短交付周期的潜力,因此正受到制造商的更多关注,因为他们正努力提高供应链的弹性和效率。一种新的固态快速成型制造工艺,即快速摩擦搅拌沉积(AFSD),已显示出成为混合制造重要工艺的潜力。为了证明选择混合制造方法的合理性,需要对成本进行估算,以便与传统方法进行比较。由于制造工艺的复杂性和多样性,混合制造成本一直难以估算。本文提出的成本模型包括快速摩擦搅拌沉积、结构光扫描、铣削和车削,可在混合制造工艺规划中结合使用。这些成本模型在一个案例研究中进行了演示,并对混合制造和传统(纯机械加工)制造方法的成本估算进行了比较。在所选案例中,混合制造工艺成本为 1007.58 美元,而传统铣削工艺成本为 833.60 美元。案例研究结果表明,要在混合制造方法和传统制造方法之间做出明智的决定,必须同时考虑人工成本和材料成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Applicability of circularity protocols to extend the lifetime of a thermoplastic pultrusion line: A case study Feasibility study of using friction stir extruded recycled aluminum rods for welding and additive manufacturing Scalable and efficient fabrication of surface microstructures using a small wheeled robot with a vibration-cutting tool Influence of parameter variation and interlayer temperature control in wall angle, curvature and measurement methodology of ER70S-6 parts obtained by WAAM Hard and wear resistant AISI304 stainless steel clad layer deposited on mild steel substrate by TIG cladding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1