A critical assessment of the onset strain of densification in the evaluation of energy absorption for additively manufactured cellular materials

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.089
Mandar Shinde, Irving E. Ramirez-Chavez, Alexander Potts, Dhruv Bhate
{"title":"A critical assessment of the onset strain of densification in the evaluation of energy absorption for additively manufactured cellular materials","authors":"Mandar Shinde,&nbsp;Irving E. Ramirez-Chavez,&nbsp;Alexander Potts,&nbsp;Dhruv Bhate","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Densification strain is an essential parameter in the characterization of energy absorption of additively manufactured cellular structures. In addition to its own merits as a metric that indicates usable stroke length for energy absorbers, it is central to the computation of energy absorbed by the structure. However, at least four different approaches have been used in the literature, each with its own limitations. In this work, a critical review of these approaches is first presented. While the maximum efficiency approach has been demonstrated to be optimal for cellular foams, this work shows how, for some additively manufactured cellular materials, it can fail to estimate densification strain accurately due to its sensitivity to instantaneous stress values in the plateau region. An alternative method is proposed in this work that leverages peak stress instead to determine the onset strain of densification and is shown to be consistently accurate across a range of cellular materials. The method is validated with the results from an experimental study of energy absorption in six different types of cellular structures across three relative densities, with identical geometries fabricated in two different base materials and processes: AlSi10Mg with Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and Nylon-12 with Selective Laser Sintering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 708-719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Densification strain is an essential parameter in the characterization of energy absorption of additively manufactured cellular structures. In addition to its own merits as a metric that indicates usable stroke length for energy absorbers, it is central to the computation of energy absorbed by the structure. However, at least four different approaches have been used in the literature, each with its own limitations. In this work, a critical review of these approaches is first presented. While the maximum efficiency approach has been demonstrated to be optimal for cellular foams, this work shows how, for some additively manufactured cellular materials, it can fail to estimate densification strain accurately due to its sensitivity to instantaneous stress values in the plateau region. An alternative method is proposed in this work that leverages peak stress instead to determine the onset strain of densification and is shown to be consistently accurate across a range of cellular materials. The method is validated with the results from an experimental study of energy absorption in six different types of cellular structures across three relative densities, with identical geometries fabricated in two different base materials and processes: AlSi10Mg with Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and Nylon-12 with Selective Laser Sintering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在评估增材制造蜂窝材料的能量吸收时对致密化起始应变进行严格评估
致密化应变是表征加成制造蜂窝结构能量吸收的一个重要参数。除了作为表示能量吸收器可用冲程长度的指标本身的优点外,它还是计算结构能量吸收的核心。然而,文献中至少使用了四种不同的方法,每种方法都有其自身的局限性。在这项工作中,首先对这些方法进行了严格审查。虽然最大效率法已被证明是蜂窝泡沫的最佳方法,但本研究表明,对于某些添加制造的蜂窝材料,由于其对高原区瞬时应力值的敏感性,该方法可能无法准确估计致密化应变。本研究提出了一种替代方法,利用峰值应力来确定致密化的起始应变,结果表明该方法在一系列蜂窝材料中始终保持精确。该方法通过对三种相对密度的六种不同类型蜂窝结构的能量吸收实验研究结果进行了验证,这些蜂窝结构采用两种不同的基体材料和工艺制造而成,具有相同的几何形状:采用激光粉末床熔融技术的 AlSi10Mg 和采用选择性激光烧结技术的尼龙-12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Applicability of circularity protocols to extend the lifetime of a thermoplastic pultrusion line: A case study Feasibility study of using friction stir extruded recycled aluminum rods for welding and additive manufacturing Scalable and efficient fabrication of surface microstructures using a small wheeled robot with a vibration-cutting tool Influence of parameter variation and interlayer temperature control in wall angle, curvature and measurement methodology of ER70S-6 parts obtained by WAAM Hard and wear resistant AISI304 stainless steel clad layer deposited on mild steel substrate by TIG cladding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1