Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Applied Water Science Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w
Sooyeon Yi, Jaeeung Yi
{"title":"Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning","authors":"Sooyeon Yi,&nbsp;Jaeeung Yi","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in R2) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in R2) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于水库的洪水预报和预警:深度学习与机器学习
为应对气候危机导致的日益增加的洪水风险,城市地区需要先进的预报和明智的决策,以支持可持续发展。本研究旨在提高基于水库的洪水预报的可靠性,确保有足够的准备时间采取有效的应对措施。主要目标是预测参考点的每小时下游泄洪量,比较一座水库在 4 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测与三座水库在 7 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测,并评估数据驱动方法的准确性。研究地点位于韩国首尔的汉江流域。方法包括两种非深度学习 (NDL)(随机森林 (RF)、支持向量回归 (SVR))和两种深度学习 (DL)(长短期记忆 (LSTM)、门控递归单元 (GRU))。方案 1 结合了三个水库的数据,而方案 2 则只关注帕尔当水库。结果表明,在情景 1 中,RF 的性能(R2)比 SVR 高 4.03%,而 GRU 的性能(R2)比 LSTM 高 4.69%。在情景 2 中,没有一个模型表现出突出的性能。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种基于水库的两步法:最初的预测应利用三个上游水库的模型,提前期较长,而在临近事件发生时,模型应专注于单个水库,预测更准确。这项工作是一项重大贡献,为地方政府发布洪水预警和实施疏散提供了准确及时的预测,从而减轻了洪水对城市地区造成的破坏和人员伤亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Simulation of wheat water footprint using AquaCrop model under the climate change, case study in Qazvin plain An innovative approach for quality assessment and its contamination on surface water for drinking purpose in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha of India, with the integration of BA-WQI, AHP-TOPSIS, FL-DWQI, MOORA, and RF methodology Identifying homogeneous hydrological zones for flood prediction using multivariable statistical methods and machine learning Controlling stormwater at the source: dawn of a new era in integrated water resources management Adoption challenges of environmental monitoring practices: case study of temperature data loggers in selected Australian vegetable supply chains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1