Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms, work postures, quantification of muscle activity, and estimation of grip/push forces among sonographers

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1002/hfm.21051
Zahra ZangiAbadi, Hamid Khabiri, Alireza Mirbagheri, Gholamhossein Halvani, Mohsen Askarishahi, Mehnoosh Nasiri
{"title":"Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms, work postures, quantification of muscle activity, and estimation of grip/push forces among sonographers","authors":"Zahra ZangiAbadi,&nbsp;Hamid Khabiri,&nbsp;Alireza Mirbagheri,&nbsp;Gholamhossein Halvani,&nbsp;Mohsen Askarishahi,&nbsp;Mehnoosh Nasiri","doi":"10.1002/hfm.21051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the physical nature of their work, sonographers are exposed to many musculoskeletal disorder risk factors, including awkward posture, repetitive movements, forceful manual exertion, and static muscle contractions, especially in the upper limbs. The current study is an investigation of musculoskeletal disorders among sonographers, caused by various occupational risk factors via different sonographic scan types. During the first phase of this study, the musculoskeletal symptoms and work postures of 29 subjects were investigated. During the second phase, muscle activity was quantified, and grip/push forces were estimated using the data obtained from 10 volunteer sonographers. 82% of sonographers experienced musculoskeletal symptoms. Based on the final scores and action levels obtained via rapid upper limb assessment, while performing scans of left regions; ergonomic changes and interventions were found necessary, to relieve stress on the sonographer's body. The results of muscular activity per muscle and scan type, showed that the mean muscle activity of the middle deltoid muscle was significantly higher during the right abdominal scan (17.64% maximum voluntary contraction [MVC]), compared to those of thyroid (12.54% MVC) and left abdominal (7.32% MVC) scans. Additionally, mean grip and push forces during both abdominal scans were significantly higher than those during the thyroid scan. Despite an injury risk during all scans, risk factor impact was different among scan types. This groundbreaking study represents the first that captures and measures both grip and push forces simultaneously, which may prove helpful while investigating corrective interventions or optimizing design of sonography robots and ergonomic probes in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"34 6","pages":"589-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.21051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the physical nature of their work, sonographers are exposed to many musculoskeletal disorder risk factors, including awkward posture, repetitive movements, forceful manual exertion, and static muscle contractions, especially in the upper limbs. The current study is an investigation of musculoskeletal disorders among sonographers, caused by various occupational risk factors via different sonographic scan types. During the first phase of this study, the musculoskeletal symptoms and work postures of 29 subjects were investigated. During the second phase, muscle activity was quantified, and grip/push forces were estimated using the data obtained from 10 volunteer sonographers. 82% of sonographers experienced musculoskeletal symptoms. Based on the final scores and action levels obtained via rapid upper limb assessment, while performing scans of left regions; ergonomic changes and interventions were found necessary, to relieve stress on the sonographer's body. The results of muscular activity per muscle and scan type, showed that the mean muscle activity of the middle deltoid muscle was significantly higher during the right abdominal scan (17.64% maximum voluntary contraction [MVC]), compared to those of thyroid (12.54% MVC) and left abdominal (7.32% MVC) scans. Additionally, mean grip and push forces during both abdominal scans were significantly higher than those during the thyroid scan. Despite an injury risk during all scans, risk factor impact was different among scan types. This groundbreaking study represents the first that captures and measures both grip and push forces simultaneously, which may prove helpful while investigating corrective interventions or optimizing design of sonography robots and ergonomic probes in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对超声波技师的肌肉骨骼症状、工作姿势、肌肉活动量化以及握力/推力估算的调查
由于其工作的体力性质,超声技师面临着许多肌肉骨骼疾病的风险因素,包括姿势笨拙、重复动作、用力体力劳动和静态肌肉收缩,尤其是上肢。目前的研究是通过不同的超声扫描类型,调查各种职业风险因素对超声技师造成的肌肉骨骼疾病。在研究的第一阶段,对 29 名受试者的肌肉骨骼症状和工作姿势进行了调查。在第二阶段,对肌肉活动进行了量化,并利用从 10 名志愿超声技师那里获得的数据估算了握力/推力。82%的超声波技师出现了肌肉骨骼症状。根据对左侧区域进行扫描时通过快速上肢评估获得的最终分数和动作水平,发现有必要改变人体工程学并采取干预措施,以减轻超声技师身体的压力。每块肌肉和扫描类型的肌肉活动结果显示,与甲状腺(12.54% MVC)和左腹(7.32% MVC)扫描相比,右腹扫描时三角肌中部的平均肌肉活动明显更高(17.64% 最大自主收缩 [MVC])。此外,两次腹部扫描的平均握力和推力都明显高于甲状腺扫描。尽管在所有扫描过程中都存在受伤风险,但风险因素对不同扫描类型的影响是不同的。这项开创性的研究首次同时捕捉并测量了握力和推力,这可能有助于在未来的研究中调查纠正干预措施或优化声像摄影机器人和人体工学探头的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Individual and Team-Level Variables on Burnout in Healthcare Providers Towards Holistic Functional Task Analysis Issue Information An expository analysis of biomechanical and subjective impacts induced by shoe inserts in asymptomatic subjects: A systematic review on functionality and mechanisms of action Evaluating human error probability in maintenance task: An integrated system dynamics and machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1