To Eat, or Not to Eat? A Psychoanalytic View on the Food-Parent

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/bjp.12917
Rhett-Lawson Mohajer, Sydney Dick, Natalia D. Salinas, Tara Rava Zolnikov
{"title":"To Eat, or Not to Eat? A Psychoanalytic View on the Food-Parent","authors":"Rhett-Lawson Mohajer,&nbsp;Sydney Dick,&nbsp;Natalia D. Salinas,&nbsp;Tara Rava Zolnikov","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research shows eating disorders increase the mortality rate: anorexia nervosa has the highest mortality rate and yet an accurate morbidity rate of bulimia nervosa remains hidden. However, research on the endopsychic structural dynamics that perpetuate in patients with eating disorders is scant. This essay depicts the use of Fairbairn's theory of endopsychic personality structure in understanding anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Fairbairn, of the independent group of British object relations theorists, provides a picture of the endopsychic structure based on the conscious and unconscious psychodynamics between partial ego/part-object dyads. Using three case histories, the following pages illustrate the incessantly present endopsychic permutations of the aforementioned dynamics and the possibility of the entrapment in one of these or swinging from one to the other in eating disorders. The essay also shows that early traumatic experiences are present in the case history of individuals with any one of these eating disorders and despite their manifested behavioural differences, they result from the widening of fissures in the universal split in the psyche due to emotional and/or physical abuse. Finally, using Fairbairn's theory, the analysis in the essay explains the comorbidity of certain eating disorders and borderline personality structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"40 4","pages":"582-595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research shows eating disorders increase the mortality rate: anorexia nervosa has the highest mortality rate and yet an accurate morbidity rate of bulimia nervosa remains hidden. However, research on the endopsychic structural dynamics that perpetuate in patients with eating disorders is scant. This essay depicts the use of Fairbairn's theory of endopsychic personality structure in understanding anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Fairbairn, of the independent group of British object relations theorists, provides a picture of the endopsychic structure based on the conscious and unconscious psychodynamics between partial ego/part-object dyads. Using three case histories, the following pages illustrate the incessantly present endopsychic permutations of the aforementioned dynamics and the possibility of the entrapment in one of these or swinging from one to the other in eating disorders. The essay also shows that early traumatic experiences are present in the case history of individuals with any one of these eating disorders and despite their manifested behavioural differences, they result from the widening of fissures in the universal split in the psyche due to emotional and/or physical abuse. Finally, using Fairbairn's theory, the analysis in the essay explains the comorbidity of certain eating disorders and borderline personality structure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吃,还是不吃?从精神分析角度看食物与父母
研究表明,饮食失调症会增加死亡率:神经性厌食症的死亡率最高,而神经性贪食症的准确发病率仍不为人知。然而,关于饮食失调症患者的内在心理结构动力的研究却很少。这篇文章描述了如何运用费尔贝恩的内心理人格结构理论来理解神经性厌食症、暴食症和贪食症。费尔贝恩是英国客体关系理论家中的一个独立团体,他根据部分自我/部分客体二元间有意识和无意识的心理动力学,描绘了一种内在心理结构。下文通过三个病例,说明了上述动力在心理上的不断变化,以及饮食失调症患者陷入其中一种动力或从一种动力摇摆到另一种动力的可能性。文章还表明,任何一种饮食失调症患者的病史中都存在早期创伤经历,尽管他们的行为表现各不相同,但都是由于情感和/或身体虐待导致心理普遍分裂的裂缝扩大所致。最后,文章利用费尔贝恩的理论,分析解释了某些饮食失调症与边缘型人格结构的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover and Editorial Board Introduction to Focus Point Transgender Is the Next Big Thing We Have to Really Face Psychoanalytically: What Research Can Tell Us About How Psychoanalytic, Psychodynamic and Jungian Psychotherapists Work Clinically with Transgender Clients Gender Under Scrutiny – Whose Gender? Gender Dysphoria – The Importance of In-depth Psychological Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1