A novel puzzle ring replacement technique of a lumen-apposing metal stent with a double-pigtail plastic stent to prevent walled-off necrosis recurrence (with video)

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70020
Shuntaro Mukai, Atsushi Sofuni, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Reina Tanaka, Ryosuke Tonozuka, Kenjiro Yamamoto, Yukitoshi Matsunami, Kazumasa Nagai, Hiroyuki Kojima, Hirohito Minami, Kyoko Asano, Takao Itoi
{"title":"A novel puzzle ring replacement technique of a lumen-apposing metal stent with a double-pigtail plastic stent to prevent walled-off necrosis recurrence (with video)","authors":"Shuntaro Mukai,&nbsp;Atsushi Sofuni,&nbsp;Takayoshi Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Reina Tanaka,&nbsp;Ryosuke Tonozuka,&nbsp;Kenjiro Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yukitoshi Matsunami,&nbsp;Kazumasa Nagai,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kojima,&nbsp;Hirohito Minami,&nbsp;Kyoko Asano,&nbsp;Takao Itoi","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Replacing a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) after treatment for walled-off necrosis contributes to the prevention of recurrence. However, the success rate is not very high. To overcome this issue, we devised a novel stent-replacement technique. In the final treatment procedure, a 7-F DPS was placed in the lumen of the LAMS. Subsequently, the walled-off necrosis shrank, and granulation formed over the pigtail portion, which fixed the DPS. The LAMS alone was removed with grasping forceps, leaving the DPS in the lumen of the LAMS (i.e., a puzzle-ring technique; direct or rotary removal technique). Between August 2021 and August 2023, 18 patients were evaluated for recurrence prevention using this novel technique (median duration of LAMS placement, 37 days). In 17 patients (94.4%), the LAMS was successfully replaced with a 7-F DPS (direct technique 14, rotary technique 3; median removal procedure time, 3 min). No recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 385 days. Before using this technique (April 2012 to August 2022), the technical success rate of replacement of LAMS with 7-F DPS was significantly lower (61.8% [42/68, <i>p</i> = 0.02]). Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection occurred in 15.3% (4/26) of the patients who could not undergo replacement with a 7-F DPS. The novel puzzle ring technique, which improves the success rate of LAMS for DPS replacement, may be useful in reducing recurrence after walled-off necrosis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) after treatment for walled-off necrosis contributes to the prevention of recurrence. However, the success rate is not very high. To overcome this issue, we devised a novel stent-replacement technique. In the final treatment procedure, a 7-F DPS was placed in the lumen of the LAMS. Subsequently, the walled-off necrosis shrank, and granulation formed over the pigtail portion, which fixed the DPS. The LAMS alone was removed with grasping forceps, leaving the DPS in the lumen of the LAMS (i.e., a puzzle-ring technique; direct or rotary removal technique). Between August 2021 and August 2023, 18 patients were evaluated for recurrence prevention using this novel technique (median duration of LAMS placement, 37 days). In 17 patients (94.4%), the LAMS was successfully replaced with a 7-F DPS (direct technique 14, rotary technique 3; median removal procedure time, 3 min). No recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 385 days. Before using this technique (April 2012 to August 2022), the technical success rate of replacement of LAMS with 7-F DPS was significantly lower (61.8% [42/68, p = 0.02]). Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection occurred in 15.3% (4/26) of the patients who could not undergo replacement with a 7-F DPS. The novel puzzle ring technique, which improves the success rate of LAMS for DPS replacement, may be useful in reducing recurrence after walled-off necrosis treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用双尾塑料支架置换管腔封闭金属支架以防止脱壁坏死复发的新型拼图环置换技术(附视频)
在治疗贴壁坏死后,用双尾塑料支架(DPS)取代腔隙贴壁金属支架(LAMS)有助于防止复发。然而,成功率并不高。为了解决这个问题,我们设计了一种新颖的支架置换技术。在最终的治疗过程中,我们在 LAMS 管腔内放置了一个 7-F DPS。随后,贴壁坏死萎缩,肉芽在固定 DPS 的辫子部分形成。用抓钳将 LAMS 单独移除,将 DPS 留在 LAMS 管腔中(即拼图环技术;直接或旋转移除技术)。2021 年 8 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,18 名患者接受了使用这种新技术预防复发的评估(置入 LAMS 的中位持续时间为 37 天)。在 17 名患者(94.4%)中,用 7-F DPS 成功替换了 LAMS(直接技术 14 例,旋转技术 3 例;中位移除手术时间 3 分钟)。在 385 天的中位观察期内未发现复发。在使用该技术之前(2012 年 4 月至 2022 年 8 月),使用 7-F DPS 替换 LAMS 的技术成功率明显较低(61.8% [42/68, p = 0.02])。在无法使用 7-F DPS 置换的患者中,15.3%(4/26)的患者出现了胰液积聚复发。新型拼图环技术提高了 LAMS 置换 DPS 的成功率,可能有助于减少贴壁坏死治疗后的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PuraStat as secondary therapy for hemostasis in Mallory−Weiss syndrome with oral antithrombotic medication Correction to “The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for small focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm” Endoscopic features of the duodenal pyloric gland adenoma: A case series of 14 patients Impact of time from diagnosis to endoscopic submucosal dissection on curability in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma The competency of the novel through-the-scope suture device for gastric mucosal defects: In vivo study in a porcine model (with video)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1