Characteristics of Lumbar Pars Interarticularis and Pedicle Stress Injuries by Sport in 902 Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Retrospective Study.

Peter K Kriz,John P Kriz,Sarah B Willwerth,Danielle L Hunt,Michael A Beasley,Cynthia J Stein,Lyle J Micheli,Michael J O'Brien,Daniel J Hedequist,William P Meehan
{"title":"Characteristics of Lumbar Pars Interarticularis and Pedicle Stress Injuries by Sport in 902 Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Peter K Kriz,John P Kriz,Sarah B Willwerth,Danielle L Hunt,Michael A Beasley,Cynthia J Stein,Lyle J Micheli,Michael J O'Brien,Daniel J Hedequist,William P Meehan","doi":"10.1177/03635465241283054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRecent studies utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent athletes have indicated that upper level lumbar involvement has a higher incidence than previously reported. There has been a paucity of literature evaluating sport-specific patterns of lumbar spondylolysis, specifically upper versus lower level involvement.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo assess the potential risk factors for upper level stress injuries of the lumbar spine in pediatric and adolescent athletes.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe medical records of 902 pediatric and adolescent athletes (364 female, 538 male; mean age, 14.5 ± 2.1 years) diagnosed with symptomatic pedicle and pars interarticularis stress injuries at 2 academic medical centers (July 2016 to June 2021) were reviewed. All patients had undergone MRI at the time of diagnosis. Only patients with pars/pedicle edema on MRI were included. Data regarding single-sport specialization, sport participation, sport category by biomechanics (axial rotation vs extension/axial loading), and vertebral level of injury over the 5-year period were analyzed. Stress reaction or active spondylolysis (SRAS) was the terminology used to designate grade 1, 2a, or 3 stress injuries according to the adapted Hollenberg classification system on MRI. Upper level vertebrae were defined as L3 or superior, whereas lower level vertebrae included L4 or inferior.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 902 patients with SRAS injuries, most (n = 753 [83.5%]) had exclusively single-level lower stress injuries, while 67 (7.4%) had multilevel stress injuries. There were 82 athletes (9.1%) who had single-level upper stress injuries. Athletes with upper level pars/pedicle stress injuries were older at the time of diagnosis (15.8 ± 1.9 vs 14.3 ± 2.1 years, respectively; P < .001), had a shorter duration of low back pain before presentation (2.50 ± 2.70 vs 4.14 ± 6.73 months, respectively; P < .001), were more likely to specialize in a single sport (43.9% vs 32.3%, respectively; P = .046), and had a lower incidence of active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis (42.7% vs 59.8%, respectively; P = .004) compared with athletes with lower level stress injuries. Athletes with lumbar stress injuries who specialized in a single sport had nearly twice the odds of having upper level involvement compared with multiple-sport athletes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.06-3.04]; P = .03). Athletes with active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis had nearly half the odds of having upper level involvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.33-0.91]; P = .02).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAge at the time of diagnosis, duration of low back pain, single-sport specialization, and presence/absence of active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis were primary predictors of whether an athlete's lumbar stress injury was classified as either upper or lower level involvement. Overall, the variables included in multivariate analysis were modest predictors, explaining only 15.1% of the variance in the rates of lumbosacral stress injuries classified by spinal level. These specific biomechanical factors and other potential contributors to these findings warrant further investigation.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241283054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recent studies utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent athletes have indicated that upper level lumbar involvement has a higher incidence than previously reported. There has been a paucity of literature evaluating sport-specific patterns of lumbar spondylolysis, specifically upper versus lower level involvement. PURPOSE To assess the potential risk factors for upper level stress injuries of the lumbar spine in pediatric and adolescent athletes. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS The medical records of 902 pediatric and adolescent athletes (364 female, 538 male; mean age, 14.5 ± 2.1 years) diagnosed with symptomatic pedicle and pars interarticularis stress injuries at 2 academic medical centers (July 2016 to June 2021) were reviewed. All patients had undergone MRI at the time of diagnosis. Only patients with pars/pedicle edema on MRI were included. Data regarding single-sport specialization, sport participation, sport category by biomechanics (axial rotation vs extension/axial loading), and vertebral level of injury over the 5-year period were analyzed. Stress reaction or active spondylolysis (SRAS) was the terminology used to designate grade 1, 2a, or 3 stress injuries according to the adapted Hollenberg classification system on MRI. Upper level vertebrae were defined as L3 or superior, whereas lower level vertebrae included L4 or inferior. RESULTS Of the 902 patients with SRAS injuries, most (n = 753 [83.5%]) had exclusively single-level lower stress injuries, while 67 (7.4%) had multilevel stress injuries. There were 82 athletes (9.1%) who had single-level upper stress injuries. Athletes with upper level pars/pedicle stress injuries were older at the time of diagnosis (15.8 ± 1.9 vs 14.3 ± 2.1 years, respectively; P < .001), had a shorter duration of low back pain before presentation (2.50 ± 2.70 vs 4.14 ± 6.73 months, respectively; P < .001), were more likely to specialize in a single sport (43.9% vs 32.3%, respectively; P = .046), and had a lower incidence of active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis (42.7% vs 59.8%, respectively; P = .004) compared with athletes with lower level stress injuries. Athletes with lumbar stress injuries who specialized in a single sport had nearly twice the odds of having upper level involvement compared with multiple-sport athletes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.06-3.04]; P = .03). Athletes with active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis had nearly half the odds of having upper level involvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.33-0.91]; P = .02). CONCLUSION Age at the time of diagnosis, duration of low back pain, single-sport specialization, and presence/absence of active spondylolysis on MRI at the time of diagnosis were primary predictors of whether an athlete's lumbar stress injury was classified as either upper or lower level involvement. Overall, the variables included in multivariate analysis were modest predictors, explaining only 15.1% of the variance in the rates of lumbosacral stress injuries classified by spinal level. These specific biomechanical factors and other potential contributors to these findings warrant further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
902 名儿童和青少年运动员腰椎关节旁和椎弓根应力损伤的运动特征:回顾性研究。
背景最近利用磁共振成像(MRI)评估儿童和青少年运动员无症状腰椎骨质增生的研究表明,腰椎上段受累的发生率比以前报道的要高。评估腰椎溶解症运动特异性模式的文献很少,特别是上水平与下水平受累的情况。目的评估儿童和青少年运动员腰椎上水平应力损伤的潜在风险因素。研究设计横断面研究;证据级别,3.方法回顾了在两家学术医疗中心(2016 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月)诊断为有症状的椎弓根和关节旁应力性损伤的 902 名儿童和青少年运动员(364 名女性,538 名男性;平均年龄为 14.5 ± 2.1 岁)的病历。所有患者在确诊时均接受了核磁共振成像检查。只有在核磁共振成像中出现踝关节旁/踝关节水肿的患者才被纳入研究范围。分析了5年期间患者的单一运动专长、运动参与情况、按生物力学(轴向旋转与伸展/轴向加载)划分的运动类别以及椎体损伤程度等数据。应力反应或活动性脊柱裂(SRAS)是根据经改编的霍伦伯格核磁共振成像分类系统对1级、2a级或3级应力损伤进行命名的术语。结果 在 902 名 SRAS 损伤患者中,大多数(n = 753 [83.5%])仅为单层下部应力损伤,67 人(7.4%)为多层应力损伤。有 82 名运动员(9.1%)患有单层上部应力损伤。上层杆/柱应力损伤的运动员在确诊时年龄较大(分别为 15.8 ± 1.9 岁 vs 14.3 ± 2.1 岁;P < .001),发病前腰痛持续时间较短(分别为 2.50 ± 2.70 个月 vs 4.14 ± 6.73 个月;P < .001),更有可能专门从事一项运动(分别为 43.9% vs 32.3%;P = .046),与低水平应力性损伤的运动员相比,确诊时核磁共振成像中活动性脊椎溶解的发生率更低(分别为 42.7% vs 59.8%;P = .004)。与从事多种运动的运动员相比,专门从事单一运动的腰椎应力性损伤运动员受累上水平的几率几乎是后者的两倍(调整后的几率比为 1.80 [95% CI, 1.06-3.04];P = .03)。结论确诊时的年龄、腰痛持续时间、单一运动专长以及确诊时 MRI 上是否存在活动性脊柱溶解是预测运动员腰部应力性损伤被归类为上一级或下一级受累的主要因素。总体而言,纳入多变量分析的变量预测作用不大,只能解释按脊柱水平分类的腰骶部应力性损伤比率中 15.1% 的差异。这些特定的生物力学因素和其他可能导致这些结果的因素值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reversal of Denervation Changes in Infraspinatus Muscle After Operative Management of Paralabral Cysts: An MRI-Based Study. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is Not Associated With Postoperative Laxity, Subjective Knee Function, or Revision Surgery After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autografts. All-Inside Endoscopic Classic Bröstrom-Gould Technique: Medium-term Results. Circumferential Labral Reconstruction With Knotless All-Suture Anchors Restores Hip Distractive Stability: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis. Survivorship and Outcomes of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Repaired Through a Posteromedial Portal During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Outcome Study With a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1