Influence of Platelet Concentration on the Clinical Outcome of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Angelo Boffa,Luca De Marziani,Luca Andriolo,Alessandro Di Martino,Iacopo Romandini,Stefano Zaffagnini,Giuseppe Filardo
{"title":"Influence of Platelet Concentration on the Clinical Outcome of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Angelo Boffa,Luca De Marziani,Luca Andriolo,Alessandro Di Martino,Iacopo Romandini,Stefano Zaffagnini,Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1177/03635465241283463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of the most frequently used orthobiologic products for the injection treatment of patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). Some preliminary evidence supports the influence of platelet concentration on patients' clinical outcomes.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo analyze if platelet concentration can influence the safety and clinical efficacy of PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee OA.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study consisted of 253 patients with knee OA (142 men, 111 women; mean ± SD age, 54.8 ± 11.4 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) who were treated with 3 intra-articular injections of 5 mL of autologous leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP. All patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 months. Patients were clinically assessed thorough the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score. Platelet concentration was correlated with clinical outcome. Further analysis was performed by stratifying patients into 3 groups (homogeneous for OA severity) based on platelet concentration (high, medium, and low). All complications and adverse events were reported, as well as failures.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAn overall statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented from baseline to each follow-up evaluation. Platelet concentration positively correlated with clinical outcome. KOOS Pain improved more with higher platelet concentration at 2 months (P = .036; rho = 0.132), 6 months (P = .009; rho = 0.165), and 12 months (P = .014; rho = 0.155). The same trend was shown by the other KOOS subscales and by the IKDC Subjective score, as well as by the comparison of the groups of high-, medium-, and low-platelet PRP. The highest failure rate (15.0%) was found in the low-platelet group as compared with the medium-platelet group (3.3%) and the high-platelet group (3.3%). No differences were observed among the 3 groups in terms of adverse events.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study demonstrated that platelet concentration influences the clinical outcome of PRP injections in knee OA treatment. PRP with a higher platelet concentration provides a lower failure rate and higher clinical improvement as compared with PRP with a lower platelet concentration, with overall better results up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with knee OA.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241283463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of the most frequently used orthobiologic products for the injection treatment of patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). Some preliminary evidence supports the influence of platelet concentration on patients' clinical outcomes. PURPOSE To analyze if platelet concentration can influence the safety and clinical efficacy of PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS This study consisted of 253 patients with knee OA (142 men, 111 women; mean ± SD age, 54.8 ± 11.4 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) who were treated with 3 intra-articular injections of 5 mL of autologous leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP. All patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 months. Patients were clinically assessed thorough the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score. Platelet concentration was correlated with clinical outcome. Further analysis was performed by stratifying patients into 3 groups (homogeneous for OA severity) based on platelet concentration (high, medium, and low). All complications and adverse events were reported, as well as failures. RESULTS An overall statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented from baseline to each follow-up evaluation. Platelet concentration positively correlated with clinical outcome. KOOS Pain improved more with higher platelet concentration at 2 months (P = .036; rho = 0.132), 6 months (P = .009; rho = 0.165), and 12 months (P = .014; rho = 0.155). The same trend was shown by the other KOOS subscales and by the IKDC Subjective score, as well as by the comparison of the groups of high-, medium-, and low-platelet PRP. The highest failure rate (15.0%) was found in the low-platelet group as compared with the medium-platelet group (3.3%) and the high-platelet group (3.3%). No differences were observed among the 3 groups in terms of adverse events. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that platelet concentration influences the clinical outcome of PRP injections in knee OA treatment. PRP with a higher platelet concentration provides a lower failure rate and higher clinical improvement as compared with PRP with a lower platelet concentration, with overall better results up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with knee OA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板浓度对注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎临床效果的影响
背景富血小板血浆(PRP)是膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者注射治疗中最常用的矫形生物制品之一。目的分析血小板浓度是否会影响 PRP 注射治疗膝关节 OA 患者的安全性和临床疗效。研究设计队列研究;证据级别,3.方法该研究包括 253 名膝关节 OA 患者(男性 142 人,女性 111 人;平均 ± SD 年龄,54.8 ± 11.4 岁;Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 1-3 级),他们接受了 3 次关节内注射 5 mL 富含或贫乏白细胞的自体 PRP 治疗。所有患者均在基线、2 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时接受了前瞻性评估。通过膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)分量表和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分对患者进行临床评估。血小板浓度与临床结果相关。根据血小板浓度(高、中、低)将患者分为三组(OA 严重程度相同)进行进一步分析。结果从基线到每次随访评估,所有临床评分均有统计学意义上的显著改善。血小板浓度与临床结果呈正相关。在 2 个月(P = .036;rho = 0.132)、6 个月(P = .009;rho = 0.165)和 12 个月(P = .014;rho = 0.155)时,血小板浓度越高,KOOS 疼痛改善越明显。KOOS 的其他分量表、IKDC 主观评分以及高、中、低血小板 PRP 组的比较也显示出同样的趋势。与中血小板组(3.3%)和高血小板组(3.3%)相比,低血小板组的失败率最高(15.0%)。本研究表明,血小板浓度会影响 PRP 注射治疗膝关节 OA 的临床效果。与血小板浓度较低的 PRP 相比,血小板浓度较高的 PRP 治疗膝关节 OA 的失败率较低,临床改善程度较高,随访 12 个月后的总体效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reversal of Denervation Changes in Infraspinatus Muscle After Operative Management of Paralabral Cysts: An MRI-Based Study. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is Not Associated With Postoperative Laxity, Subjective Knee Function, or Revision Surgery After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autografts. All-Inside Endoscopic Classic Bröstrom-Gould Technique: Medium-term Results. Circumferential Labral Reconstruction With Knotless All-Suture Anchors Restores Hip Distractive Stability: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis. Survivorship and Outcomes of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Repaired Through a Posteromedial Portal During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Outcome Study With a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1