Development and Validation of a Pediatric Celiac Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measure.

Shayna Coburn,Paige J Trojanowski,Jack Vagadori,Pamela Hinds,Monique Germone,Edwin Liu,Randi Streisand,James Bost
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Pediatric Celiac Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measure.","authors":"Shayna Coburn,Paige J Trojanowski,Jack Vagadori,Pamela Hinds,Monique Germone,Edwin Liu,Randi Streisand,James Bost","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nQuality of life (QOL) is critical in screening and management of chronic medical conditions, including celiac disease (CD). This project aimed to develop a CD-specific pediatric QOL measure (\"CDLIFE\") with parallel self- and parent-report forms by generating items through concept elicitation interviews, iterative refinement using cognitive debriefing interviews, and evaluating its psychometric properties and validity.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nConcept elicitation interviews were conducted to develop items (nine youth ages 8-19 with CD; 10 parents of youth with CD), followed by cognitive interviews with additional stakeholders (three youth with CD, three parents, and eight clinicians), and item administration (parent/youth reports: n=103/102). Analyses included response frequencies, internal consistency reliability, exploratory factor analyses, and correlations with related measures (PROMIS, PEDSQL, and GFD-VAS).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFrom concept elicitation interviews, 42 youth and 45 parent items were developed. Cognitive debriefing interviews yielded 36 refined items. Psychometric analyses identified 15 items to remove due to ceiling/floor effects, poor item-to-test correlations; youth-parent mismatch or conceptual mismatch. Total score internal consistency was high (alphas=0.89-0.90). A four-factor model solution had the best fit (Social Impact, External Support, Adaptive Vigilance, Eating Behaviors/Adjustment) with a fifth single-item domain (Financial Resources). The final CDLIFE (21 items) total scores correlated with most related measures in expected directions for parent and youth forms.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe CDLIFE may facilitate insight into CD-specific QOL for youth ages 2-18 years, capturing important dimensions of physical and socioemotional health. Administering the CDLIFE will help identify and track families needing support.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Quality of life (QOL) is critical in screening and management of chronic medical conditions, including celiac disease (CD). This project aimed to develop a CD-specific pediatric QOL measure ("CDLIFE") with parallel self- and parent-report forms by generating items through concept elicitation interviews, iterative refinement using cognitive debriefing interviews, and evaluating its psychometric properties and validity. METHODS Concept elicitation interviews were conducted to develop items (nine youth ages 8-19 with CD; 10 parents of youth with CD), followed by cognitive interviews with additional stakeholders (three youth with CD, three parents, and eight clinicians), and item administration (parent/youth reports: n=103/102). Analyses included response frequencies, internal consistency reliability, exploratory factor analyses, and correlations with related measures (PROMIS, PEDSQL, and GFD-VAS). RESULTS From concept elicitation interviews, 42 youth and 45 parent items were developed. Cognitive debriefing interviews yielded 36 refined items. Psychometric analyses identified 15 items to remove due to ceiling/floor effects, poor item-to-test correlations; youth-parent mismatch or conceptual mismatch. Total score internal consistency was high (alphas=0.89-0.90). A four-factor model solution had the best fit (Social Impact, External Support, Adaptive Vigilance, Eating Behaviors/Adjustment) with a fifth single-item domain (Financial Resources). The final CDLIFE (21 items) total scores correlated with most related measures in expected directions for parent and youth forms. CONCLUSION The CDLIFE may facilitate insight into CD-specific QOL for youth ages 2-18 years, capturing important dimensions of physical and socioemotional health. Administering the CDLIFE will help identify and track families needing support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿乳糜泻生活质量测量方法的开发与验证。
引言 生活质量(QOL)对于包括乳糜泻(CD)在内的慢性疾病的筛查和管理至关重要。本项目旨在开发一种针对乳糜泻的儿科 QOL 测量方法("CDLIFE"),该方法采用平行的自我和家长报告形式,通过概念激发访谈生成项目,利用认知汇报访谈反复改进,并评估其心理测量特性和有效性。方法通过概念激发访谈(9 名 8-19 岁的 CD 青少年;10 名 CD 青少年的家长)开发项目,然后与其他利益相关者(3 名 CD 青少年、3 名家长和 8 名临床医生)进行认知访谈,并进行项目管理(家长/青少年报告:n=103/102)。分析包括反应频率、内部一致性可靠性、探索性因素分析以及与相关测量(PROMIS、PEDSQL 和 GFD-VAS)的相关性。认知汇报访谈产生了 36 个改进项目。心理测量分析发现,由于天花板/地板效应、项目与测试相关性差、青少年与家长不匹配或概念不匹配等原因,有 15 个项目需要删除。总分内部一致性较高(alphas=0.89-0.90)。四因素模型(社会影响、外部支持、适应警觉、进食行为/调整)与第五个单项领域(财务资源)的拟合度最高。最终的 CDLIFE(21 个项目)总分与大多数相关测量指标之间的相关性符合家长和青少年表格的预期方向。实施 CDLIFE 将有助于识别和跟踪需要支持的家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Second Trimester Twist: Sigmoid Volvulus as a Rare Cause of Abdominal Pain During Pregnancy. When a Pancreatic Mass Isn't Malignant: A Case of Pancreatic Splenosis. LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS OF NON-CELIAC ENTEROPATHIES AND A SCORE TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS WITH POOR OUTCOMES: A 30-YEAR MULTICENTER LONGITUDINAL STUDY. Peranal Endoscopic Myectomy for Salvage Resection of a Neuroendocrine Tumor in the Lower Rectum. Family History of Colorectal Cancer is the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia: Some Issues to Be Addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1