Prognosis After Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy in Patients With Improved Cancer Therapeutics–Related Cardiac Dysfunction

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Jacc: Cardiooncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.07.018
Hyukjin Park MD , Nuri Lee MD , Cho Hee Hwang MPH , Sang-Geon Cho MD , Ga Hui Choi MD , Jae Yeong Cho MD , Hyun Ju Yoon MD , Kye Hun Kim MD , Youngkeun Ahn MD
{"title":"Prognosis After Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy in Patients With Improved Cancer Therapeutics–Related Cardiac Dysfunction","authors":"Hyukjin Park MD ,&nbsp;Nuri Lee MD ,&nbsp;Cho Hee Hwang MPH ,&nbsp;Sang-Geon Cho MD ,&nbsp;Ga Hui Choi MD ,&nbsp;Jae Yeong Cho MD ,&nbsp;Hyun Ju Yoon MD ,&nbsp;Kye Hun Kim MD ,&nbsp;Youngkeun Ahn MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The long-term prognosis after the discontinuation of cardioprotective therapy (CPT) in patients with cancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) that has shown improvement remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to assess the prognosis after CPT withdrawal in patients exhibiting improved CTRCD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study, patients with improved CTRCD, defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥10 percentage points from the time of CTRCD diagnosis, were included. We analyzed their clinical outcomes, which included hospitalization for heart failure or a decrease in LVEF ≥10 percentage points within 2 years after CTRCD improvement, alongside echocardiographic changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort comprised 134 patients with improved CTRCD. The median follow-up duration after CTRCD diagnosis was 368.3 days (Q1-Q3: 160-536 days). After improvement, 90 patients continued CPT (continued group [CG]) and 44 withdrew CPT (withdrawn group [WG]). Among patients whose baseline LVEF at CTRCD diagnosis ranged from 45% to 55%, the final mean LVEF was comparable between both groups (CG: 64.9% ± 4.4% vs WG: 62.9% ± 4.2%; <em>P</em> = 0.059). However, for patients with a baseline LVEF &lt;45%, the final mean LVEF was significantly lower in the WG (CG: 53.3% ± 6.4% vs WG: 48.2% ± 6.9%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The occurrence of composite major clinical events was notably higher in the WG (HR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.51-7.73; <em>P</em> = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who withdrew CPT after demonstrating improvement in CTRCD experienced worse clinical outcomes. Notably, a significant decrease in LVEF was observed after CPT withdrawal in patients with a baseline LVEF &lt;45%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48499,"journal":{"name":"Jacc: Cardiooncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacc: Cardiooncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666087324002783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The long-term prognosis after the discontinuation of cardioprotective therapy (CPT) in patients with cancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) that has shown improvement remains unclear.

Objectives

This study aims to assess the prognosis after CPT withdrawal in patients exhibiting improved CTRCD.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study, patients with improved CTRCD, defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥10 percentage points from the time of CTRCD diagnosis, were included. We analyzed their clinical outcomes, which included hospitalization for heart failure or a decrease in LVEF ≥10 percentage points within 2 years after CTRCD improvement, alongside echocardiographic changes.

Results

The cohort comprised 134 patients with improved CTRCD. The median follow-up duration after CTRCD diagnosis was 368.3 days (Q1-Q3: 160-536 days). After improvement, 90 patients continued CPT (continued group [CG]) and 44 withdrew CPT (withdrawn group [WG]). Among patients whose baseline LVEF at CTRCD diagnosis ranged from 45% to 55%, the final mean LVEF was comparable between both groups (CG: 64.9% ± 4.4% vs WG: 62.9% ± 4.2%; P = 0.059). However, for patients with a baseline LVEF <45%, the final mean LVEF was significantly lower in the WG (CG: 53.3% ± 6.4% vs WG: 48.2% ± 6.9%; P < 0.001). The occurrence of composite major clinical events was notably higher in the WG (HR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.51-7.73; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Patients who withdrew CPT after demonstrating improvement in CTRCD experienced worse clinical outcomes. Notably, a significant decrease in LVEF was observed after CPT withdrawal in patients with a baseline LVEF <45%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症治疗相关心功能障碍改善患者停用心脏保护疗法后的预后情况
背景癌症治疗相关心功能不全(CTRCD)患者停用心脏保护疗法(CPT)后的长期预后仍不明确。目的本研究旨在评估CTRCD改善患者停用CPT后的预后。方法在这项对单中心前瞻性队列研究的回顾性分析中,纳入了 CTRCD 改善的患者(定义为左室射血分数(LVEF)比 CTRCD 诊断时增加≥10 个百分点)。我们对他们的临床结果进行了分析,其中包括因心力衰竭住院或 CTRCD 改善后 2 年内 LVEF 下降≥10 个百分点,以及超声心动图的变化。CTRCD 诊断后的中位随访时间为 368.3 天(Q1-Q3:160-536 天)。病情好转后,90 名患者继续接受 CPT 治疗(继续治疗组 [CG]),44 名患者退出 CPT 治疗(退出治疗组 [WG])。在确诊 CTRCD 时基线 LVEF 为 45% 至 55% 的患者中,两组的最终平均 LVEF 相当(CG:64.9% ± 4.4% vs WG:62.9% ± 4.2%;P = 0.059)。然而,对于基线 LVEF 为 45% 的患者,WG 组的最终平均 LVEF 明显较低(CG:53.3% ± 6.4% vs WG:48.2% ± 6.9%;P <0.001)。WG发生复合主要临床事件的比例明显更高(HR:3.06;95% CI:1.51-7.73;P = 0.002)。值得注意的是,基线 LVEF 为 45% 的患者在停用 CPT 后 LVEF 明显下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
6.30%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: JACC: CardioOncology is a specialized journal that belongs to the esteemed Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family. Its purpose is to enhance cardiovascular care for cancer patients by publishing high-quality, innovative scientific research and sharing evidence-based knowledge. The journal aims to revolutionize the field of cardio-oncology and actively involve and educate professionals in both cardiovascular and oncology fields. It covers a wide range of topics including pre-clinical, translational, and clinical research, as well as best practices in cardio-oncology. Key areas of focus include understanding disease mechanisms, utilizing in vitro and in vivo models, exploring novel and traditional therapeutics (across Phase I-IV trials), studying epidemiology, employing precision medicine, and investigating primary and secondary prevention. Amyloidosis, cardiovascular risk factors, heart failure, and vascular disease are some examples of the disease states that are of particular interest to the journal. However, it welcomes research on other relevant conditions as well.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Correction Cardiovascular Considerations Before Cancer Therapy Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in Adult Cancer Patients Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Preclinical Cardiotoxicity Screening in Cardio-Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1