{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of upadacitinib versus dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have been shown in clinical trials, real world data are still limited. The aim of this retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe AD in real world practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study included patients with moderate to severe AD, who were enrolled from May 2022 to March 2024, to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab over 12 weeks duration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-seven patients were included (46 received Upadacitinib and 41 Dupilumab). Compared with week 0, there was a significant decrease in EASI score, ADCT score and NRS score in patients of both groups in weeks 4, 8, and 12. In week 4, the reduction in EASI score, ADCT score and NRS score was significantly greater in patients of Upadacitinib group compared to those in Dupilumab group. Compared to baseline, in week 12, the decrease in IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 level in the serum of patients in Upadacitinib group was significantly greater than that of patients in Dupilumab group. The total IgE of patients in Dupilumab group decreased significantly, while there was no significant change in patients of Upadacitinib group. Although Upadacitinib group reported more adverse events than Dupilumab group, no serious adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both Upadacitinib and Dupilumab groups showed effective trend in patients with moderate to severe AD. Upadacitinib has better efficacy and rapid onset in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13859,"journal":{"name":"International immunopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International immunopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576924019052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Although efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have been shown in clinical trials, real world data are still limited. The aim of this retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe AD in real world practice.
Methods
A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study included patients with moderate to severe AD, who were enrolled from May 2022 to March 2024, to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab over 12 weeks duration.
Results
Eighty-seven patients were included (46 received Upadacitinib and 41 Dupilumab). Compared with week 0, there was a significant decrease in EASI score, ADCT score and NRS score in patients of both groups in weeks 4, 8, and 12. In week 4, the reduction in EASI score, ADCT score and NRS score was significantly greater in patients of Upadacitinib group compared to those in Dupilumab group. Compared to baseline, in week 12, the decrease in IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 level in the serum of patients in Upadacitinib group was significantly greater than that of patients in Dupilumab group. The total IgE of patients in Dupilumab group decreased significantly, while there was no significant change in patients of Upadacitinib group. Although Upadacitinib group reported more adverse events than Dupilumab group, no serious adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
Both Upadacitinib and Dupilumab groups showed effective trend in patients with moderate to severe AD. Upadacitinib has better efficacy and rapid onset in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD.
期刊介绍：
International Immunopharmacology is the primary vehicle for the publication of original research papers pertinent to the overlapping areas of immunology, pharmacology, cytokine biology, immunotherapy, immunopathology and immunotoxicology. Review articles that encompass these subjects are also welcome.
The subject material appropriate for submission includes:
• Clinical studies employing immunotherapy of any type including the use of: bacterial and chemical agents; thymic hormones, interferon, lymphokines, etc., in transplantation and diseases such as cancer, immunodeficiency, chronic infection and allergic, inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.
• Studies on the mechanisms of action of these agents for specific parameters of immune competence as well as the overall clinical state.
• Pre-clinical animal studies and in vitro studies on mechanisms of action with immunopotentiators, immunomodulators, immunoadjuvants and other pharmacological agents active on cells participating in immune or allergic responses.
• Pharmacological compounds, microbial products and toxicological agents that affect the lymphoid system, and their mechanisms of action.
• Agents that activate genes or modify transcription and translation within the immune response.
• Substances activated, generated, or released through immunologic or related pathways that are pharmacologically active.
• Production, function and regulation of cytokines and their receptors.
• Classical pharmacological studies on the effects of chemokines and bioactive factors released during immunological reactions.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
