Sexual and Affectionate Behaviors and Satisfaction for Adults in Romantic Relationships: A Latent Profile Analysis

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Archives of Sexual Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s10508-024-03016-y
Alyssa N. Clark, Eva S. Lefkowitz
{"title":"Sexual and Affectionate Behaviors and Satisfaction for Adults in Romantic Relationships: A Latent Profile Analysis","authors":"Alyssa N. Clark, Eva S. Lefkowitz","doi":"10.1007/s10508-024-03016-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Engaging in both sexual and affectionate behaviors with a romantic partner is often beneficial for adults’ sexual and relationship satisfaction and promotes relationship stability. However, prior research has primarily examined either adults’ sexual or affectionate behaviors, and has yet to explore patterns of sexual and affectionate behaviors and their associations with sexual and relationship satisfaction. In the current paper, we used a person-centered approach and latent profile analysis to identify specific profiles of adults’ physical behaviors in same-gender and mixed-gender relationships, and examined associations of these profiles with sexual and relationship satisfaction. Adults (<i>N</i> = 336, 85.4% LGBTQ+; 45% women, 30% men, 38.6% gender-diverse; <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 29.07 years) who were currently in a committed romantic partner relationship for at least six months completed online surveys. We found that a 3-profile solution best fit the data and identified the following profiles: Infrequent Physical Behaviors, Affection-focused Behaviors, and Comprehensive Physical Behaviors. Adults in the Infrequent Physical Behaviors profile were less sexually and relationally satisfied than adults in the other profiles. Adults in the Comprehensive Physical Behaviors profile were more sexually satisfied than the two other profiles. Further, profiles did not differ for mixed-gender compared to same-gender or gender-diverse couples. Our findings have implications for understanding the diversity in adults’ physical behavior patterns, including how clinicians might better support adults’ sexual and relationship satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-03016-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging in both sexual and affectionate behaviors with a romantic partner is often beneficial for adults’ sexual and relationship satisfaction and promotes relationship stability. However, prior research has primarily examined either adults’ sexual or affectionate behaviors, and has yet to explore patterns of sexual and affectionate behaviors and their associations with sexual and relationship satisfaction. In the current paper, we used a person-centered approach and latent profile analysis to identify specific profiles of adults’ physical behaviors in same-gender and mixed-gender relationships, and examined associations of these profiles with sexual and relationship satisfaction. Adults (N = 336, 85.4% LGBTQ+; 45% women, 30% men, 38.6% gender-diverse; Mage = 29.07 years) who were currently in a committed romantic partner relationship for at least six months completed online surveys. We found that a 3-profile solution best fit the data and identified the following profiles: Infrequent Physical Behaviors, Affection-focused Behaviors, and Comprehensive Physical Behaviors. Adults in the Infrequent Physical Behaviors profile were less sexually and relationally satisfied than adults in the other profiles. Adults in the Comprehensive Physical Behaviors profile were more sexually satisfied than the two other profiles. Further, profiles did not differ for mixed-gender compared to same-gender or gender-diverse couples. Our findings have implications for understanding the diversity in adults’ physical behavior patterns, including how clinicians might better support adults’ sexual and relationship satisfaction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年人在恋爱关系中的性行为和情感行为及满意度:潜在特征分析
与恋爱伴侣进行性行为和亲昵行为通常有利于提高成年人的性满意度和关系满意度,并促进关系的稳定。然而,以往的研究主要考察的是成年人的性行为或亲昵行为,尚未探讨性行为和亲昵行为的模式及其与性满意度和关系满意度的关联。在本论文中,我们采用了以人为中心的方法和潜在特征分析来识别成年人在同性和异性关系中身体行为的具体特征,并研究了这些特征与性满意度和关系满意度的关联。目前至少有六个月恋爱关系的成年人(人数 = 336,85.4% 为 LGBTQ+;45% 为女性,30% 为男性,38.6% 为不同性别;年龄 = 29.07 岁)完成了在线调查。我们发现 3 种特征解决方案最适合数据,并确定了以下特征:不频繁的身体行为、以感情为重点的行为和全面的身体行为。与其他类型的成年人相比,不经常发生身体行为类型的成年人在性和关系方面的满意度较低。综合身体行为特征的成年人在性方面的满意度高于其他两个特征的成年人。此外,与同性或不同性别的夫妇相比,混合性别夫妇的情况并无不同。我们的研究结果对了解成年人身体行为模式的多样性具有重要意义,包括临床医生如何更好地支持成年人的性满意度和关系满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Young People on Social Media-Based Sexuality Education Using a Feminist Approach in China: A Qualitative Study. Sexual Assault Gossip: Who Do We Share with and Why? Stigma and Sexual Dissatisfaction in Middle-Aged and Older Sexual Minorities Correction: To Improve Sex Research, Don't Suppress Ideas You Dislike: Reply to Walters et al. (2024). Theorizing the Role of Sex Educators in the Resistance and Reification of Epistemic Injustices Related to the Sexual Expression of People with Intellectual Disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1