{"title":"Does poverty really stifle ambition? A latent profile analysis of achievement motivation for economically disadvantaged Chinese university students","authors":"Xiaoqing Zeng , Song Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to investigate the differences in achievement motivation between college students from low-income and normal-income backgrounds, and to explore the key characteristics of achievement motivation among underprivileged college students. A survey was conducted with 260060 college students, and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify the types of achievement motivation among underprivileged college students. Results showed that: (1) achievement motivation levels were significantly higher among underprivileged students compared to their non-poor counterparts. Specifically, in China, underprivileged students were significantly more driven to strive for success and less inclined to avoid failure; (2) the study identified four types of achievement motivation among disadvantaged students: <em>Optimists</em> (high pursuit of success, low failure avoidance, accounting for 7.90 %); <em>Self-protectors</em> (low pursuit of success, high failure avoidance, accounting for 29.40 %); <em>Failure Acceptors</em> (low pursuit of success, low failure avoidance, accounting for 39.30 %); and <em>Overstrivers</em> (high pursuit of success, high failure avoidance, accounting for 23.40 % of the sample). Conclusion: (1) poor students are more eager to succeed than non-poor students in China; (2) <em>Optimists</em> and <em>Overstrivers</em> seem the more positive types of achievement motivation (accounting for 31.30 %).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the differences in achievement motivation between college students from low-income and normal-income backgrounds, and to explore the key characteristics of achievement motivation among underprivileged college students. A survey was conducted with 260060 college students, and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify the types of achievement motivation among underprivileged college students. Results showed that: (1) achievement motivation levels were significantly higher among underprivileged students compared to their non-poor counterparts. Specifically, in China, underprivileged students were significantly more driven to strive for success and less inclined to avoid failure; (2) the study identified four types of achievement motivation among disadvantaged students: Optimists (high pursuit of success, low failure avoidance, accounting for 7.90 %); Self-protectors (low pursuit of success, high failure avoidance, accounting for 29.40 %); Failure Acceptors (low pursuit of success, low failure avoidance, accounting for 39.30 %); and Overstrivers (high pursuit of success, high failure avoidance, accounting for 23.40 % of the sample). Conclusion: (1) poor students are more eager to succeed than non-poor students in China; (2) Optimists and Overstrivers seem the more positive types of achievement motivation (accounting for 31.30 %).
期刊介绍:
Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.