Cost-effectiveness analysis of urban nature-based solutions: A stepwise ranking approach

Toke Emil Panduro, Doan Nainggolan, Marianne Zandersen
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of urban nature-based solutions: A stepwise ranking approach","authors":"Toke Emil Panduro,&nbsp;Doan Nainggolan,&nbsp;Marianne Zandersen","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite increasing interest in Nature-based Solutions (NbS), there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the costs of different types of NbS and their variations. Cost information is crucial for economic assessments of the viability of NbS compared to other alternatives. In this paper, we provide an overview of NbS costs in urban settings, drawing primarily from a literature review of both gray and scientific literature. We present cost estimates for establishing green and blue spaces in urban and peri-urban areas, street trees, green roofs, and green walls. Our findings show that median costs are 56 EUR/m² for green spaces, 73 EUR/m³ for blue spaces, and 201 EUR/m² for green roofs.</div><div>Furthermore, we demonstrate how an economic assessment can be carried out utilizing the calculated cost estimates while providing a systematic procedure to handle the multiple potential benefits provided by NbS. We argue that a step-wise ranked cost-effectiveness analysis, based on ranking local policy objectives, is a feasible approach for making informed choices on competing solutions relative to conventional cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis. The proposed approach could prove useful due to its relatively straightforward application and the fact that it does not require the aggregation of multiple benefits into one common measurement or valuation unit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in Nature-based Solutions (NbS), there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the costs of different types of NbS and their variations. Cost information is crucial for economic assessments of the viability of NbS compared to other alternatives. In this paper, we provide an overview of NbS costs in urban settings, drawing primarily from a literature review of both gray and scientific literature. We present cost estimates for establishing green and blue spaces in urban and peri-urban areas, street trees, green roofs, and green walls. Our findings show that median costs are 56 EUR/m² for green spaces, 73 EUR/m³ for blue spaces, and 201 EUR/m² for green roofs.
Furthermore, we demonstrate how an economic assessment can be carried out utilizing the calculated cost estimates while providing a systematic procedure to handle the multiple potential benefits provided by NbS. We argue that a step-wise ranked cost-effectiveness analysis, based on ranking local policy objectives, is a feasible approach for making informed choices on competing solutions relative to conventional cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis. The proposed approach could prove useful due to its relatively straightforward application and the fact that it does not require the aggregation of multiple benefits into one common measurement or valuation unit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市自然解决方案的成本效益分析:逐步排序法
尽管人们对基于自然的解决方案(NbS)越来越感兴趣,但对不同类型的 NbS 及其变化的成本仍然缺乏全面的了解。与其他替代方案相比,成本信息对于NbS可行性的经济评估至关重要。在本文中,我们主要从灰色文献和科学文献的文献综述中,概述了城市环境中氮化硼系统的成本。我们提出了在城市和近郊区建立绿色和蓝色空间、行道树、绿色屋顶和绿色墙壁的成本估算。我们的研究结果表明,绿地的成本中位数为 56 欧元/平方米,蓝地的成本中位数为 73 欧元/立方米,屋顶绿化的成本中位数为 201 欧元/平方米。此外,我们还展示了如何利用计算出的成本估算值进行经济评估,同时提供了处理 NbS 提供的多种潜在效益的系统性程序。我们认为,与传统的成本效益分析和成本效益分析相比,基于地方政策目标排序的分步排序成本效益分析是就相互竞争的解决方案做出明智选择的可行方法。拟议方法的应用相对简单,而且不需要将多种效益合并为一个共同的衡量或估价单位,因此可以证明是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions Exploring social contracts of disaster risk through twitter narratives during a major storm A transformations framework for mainstreaming a nature-based solutions approach Cost-benefit and equity analysis of nature-based solutions in Haiti, India, Indonesia and Uganda “Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1