Udit Dave BS , Jayanth Mosalakanti BS , Pavan Guduri BA , Mia Rumps MS , Mary K. Mulcahey MD
{"title":"Heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis after distal biceps repair","authors":"Udit Dave BS , Jayanth Mosalakanti BS , Pavan Guduri BA , Mia Rumps MS , Mary K. Mulcahey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Hypothesis and Background</h3><div>A potential complication of distal biceps repair is heterotopic ossification (HO), which impacts both limb function and overall patient outcomes. Common HO prophylaxis methods include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or localized radiation therapy. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine an effective means of providing HO prophylaxis following distal biceps repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review of the literature was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following databases were searched for studies published after 1998: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they compared patients who were placed on HO prophylaxis following distal biceps repair compared to those that were not placed on HO prophylaxis, were prospective randomized controlled trials or retrospective case-control studies, and evaluated HO prophylaxis regimens. Studies that were not written in English, analyzed animals or cadavers, and did not directly evaluate patients undergoing distal biceps repair, did not study HO rophylaxis, or had alternative study designs were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The initial search identified 134 studies, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Each of these 4 (100%) studies evaluated indomethacin, and 1 (25%) study evaluated both indomethacin and meloxicam. The included studies evaluated HO prophylaxis in the setting of both one- and two-incision distal biceps repairs. Overall, 2 of the 4 (50%) studies supported the use of indomethacin as HO prophylaxis, 1 of 4 (25%) did not support the use of indomethacin for HO prophylaxis, and 1 of 4 (25%) studies reported that indomethacin and meloxicam are similarly effective HO prophylaxis drugs. None of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria analyzed radiation therapy as a potential method for HO prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and Conclusion</h3><div>Indomethacin is commonly used as a prophylactic measure for HO following distal biceps repair; however, based on the results of this study, it is not necessary to use this routinely due to its limited efficacy in preventing HO and potential risks (eg, gastrointestinal upset, bleeding) associated with the medication. Future randomized studies should evaluate the use of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (eg, meloxicam) for HO prophylaxis in addition to not using any HO prophylaxis following either one- or two-incision distal biceps repairs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 715-719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hypothesis and Background
A potential complication of distal biceps repair is heterotopic ossification (HO), which impacts both limb function and overall patient outcomes. Common HO prophylaxis methods include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or localized radiation therapy. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine an effective means of providing HO prophylaxis following distal biceps repair.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following databases were searched for studies published after 1998: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they compared patients who were placed on HO prophylaxis following distal biceps repair compared to those that were not placed on HO prophylaxis, were prospective randomized controlled trials or retrospective case-control studies, and evaluated HO prophylaxis regimens. Studies that were not written in English, analyzed animals or cadavers, and did not directly evaluate patients undergoing distal biceps repair, did not study HO rophylaxis, or had alternative study designs were excluded.
Results
The initial search identified 134 studies, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Each of these 4 (100%) studies evaluated indomethacin, and 1 (25%) study evaluated both indomethacin and meloxicam. The included studies evaluated HO prophylaxis in the setting of both one- and two-incision distal biceps repairs. Overall, 2 of the 4 (50%) studies supported the use of indomethacin as HO prophylaxis, 1 of 4 (25%) did not support the use of indomethacin for HO prophylaxis, and 1 of 4 (25%) studies reported that indomethacin and meloxicam are similarly effective HO prophylaxis drugs. None of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria analyzed radiation therapy as a potential method for HO prophylaxis.
Discussion and Conclusion
Indomethacin is commonly used as a prophylactic measure for HO following distal biceps repair; however, based on the results of this study, it is not necessary to use this routinely due to its limited efficacy in preventing HO and potential risks (eg, gastrointestinal upset, bleeding) associated with the medication. Future randomized studies should evaluate the use of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (eg, meloxicam) for HO prophylaxis in addition to not using any HO prophylaxis following either one- or two-incision distal biceps repairs.
假设与背景 二头肌远端修复术的潜在并发症是异位骨化(HO),它会影响肢体功能和患者的整体预后。常见的异位骨化预防方法包括非甾体抗炎药或局部放射治疗。本系统性综述旨在确定在二头肌远端修复术后提供 HO 预防的有效方法。方法根据系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南对文献进行了系统性综述。检索了以下数据库中 1998 年后发表的研究:PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library。纳入的研究必须是对二头肌远端修复术后接受 HO 预防治疗的患者与未接受 HO 预防治疗的患者进行比较的研究、前瞻性随机对照试验或回顾性病例对照研究,以及对 HO 预防治疗方案进行评估的研究。非英语撰写、分析动物或尸体、未直接评估接受二头肌远端修复术的患者、未研究HO预防方案或采用其他研究设计的研究均被排除在外。结果初步检索发现了134项研究,其中4项符合纳入标准并被纳入研究。这 4 项研究(100%)均评估了吲哚美辛,1 项研究(25%)同时评估了吲哚美辛和美洛昔康。纳入的研究评估了单切口和双切口肱二头肌远端修复时的 HO 预防措施。总体而言,4 项研究中有 2 项(50%)支持使用吲哚美辛作为 HO 预防药物,4 项研究中有 1 项(25%)不支持使用吲哚美辛作为 HO 预防药物,4 项研究中有 1 项(25%)报告称吲哚美辛和美洛昔康是效果相似的 HO 预防药物。讨论与结论吲哚美辛通常被用作二头肌远端修复术后HO的预防措施;然而,根据本研究的结果,由于其预防HO的疗效有限,且存在与该药物相关的潜在风险(如胃肠道不适、出血),因此没有必要常规使用该药物。未来的随机研究应该评估在单切口或双切口股二头肌远端修复术后,除了不使用任何HO预防药物外,使用其他非甾体抗炎药(如美洛昔康)预防HO的情况。