Anthrax: A narrative review

IF 2.9 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES New Microbes and New Infections Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101501
Sumel Ashique , Aritra Biswas , Sourav Mohanto , Shriyansh Srivastava , Md Sadique Hussain , Mohammed Gulzar Ahmed , Vetriselvan Subramaniyan
{"title":"Anthrax: A narrative review","authors":"Sumel Ashique ,&nbsp;Aritra Biswas ,&nbsp;Sourav Mohanto ,&nbsp;Shriyansh Srivastava ,&nbsp;Md Sadique Hussain ,&nbsp;Mohammed Gulzar Ahmed ,&nbsp;Vetriselvan Subramaniyan","doi":"10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Bacillus anthracis</em> is a zoonotic bacterium, majorly responsible for causing human anthrax and the possibility of the outbreak spreading globally. Herbivorous animals serve as the inherent reservoir for the disease, whereas all endothermic species are vulnerable. Humans contract the disease inadvertently by contact with diseased animals or animal products or through the consumption or handling of infected flesh. There is no such reported data indicating the transmission of anthrax from human to human, which further does not guarantee the bacterium's mutations and new transmission route. Nevertheless, it can lead to various infections, including endophthalmitis, bacteremia, cutaneous infection, central nervous system infection, and pneumonia. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the present epidemiological situation of human anthrax in densely populated nations, including the altered symptoms, indications in people, and the method of transmission. This article highlights the current diagnostic methods for human anthrax, further examines the available therapy options and future perspectives in treatment protocol. This narrative review resulted from a simple search strategy on “PubMed”, “ScienceDirect”, “ClinicalTrials.gov” and web reports using “AND” as Boolean operator with search keywords, i.e., “Anthrax” AND “Infection”, “Anthrax” AND “Pandemic”, “Anthrax” AND “Infectious disease”, “Anthrax” AND “Vaccine”, “Anthrax” AND “Diagnosis” shows minimal narrative literature in between 2024 and 2005. Furthermore, this narrative review highlights the potential approaches for detecting anthrax infection, establishing suitable protocols for prevention, and focusing on the current epidemiology and available therapeutics, vaccine and its future developmental strategies for the prevention of infectious disorder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38074,"journal":{"name":"New Microbes and New Infections","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbes and New Infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524002853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis is a zoonotic bacterium, majorly responsible for causing human anthrax and the possibility of the outbreak spreading globally. Herbivorous animals serve as the inherent reservoir for the disease, whereas all endothermic species are vulnerable. Humans contract the disease inadvertently by contact with diseased animals or animal products or through the consumption or handling of infected flesh. There is no such reported data indicating the transmission of anthrax from human to human, which further does not guarantee the bacterium's mutations and new transmission route. Nevertheless, it can lead to various infections, including endophthalmitis, bacteremia, cutaneous infection, central nervous system infection, and pneumonia. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the present epidemiological situation of human anthrax in densely populated nations, including the altered symptoms, indications in people, and the method of transmission. This article highlights the current diagnostic methods for human anthrax, further examines the available therapy options and future perspectives in treatment protocol. This narrative review resulted from a simple search strategy on “PubMed”, “ScienceDirect”, “ClinicalTrials.gov” and web reports using “AND” as Boolean operator with search keywords, i.e., “Anthrax” AND “Infection”, “Anthrax” AND “Pandemic”, “Anthrax” AND “Infectious disease”, “Anthrax” AND “Vaccine”, “Anthrax” AND “Diagnosis” shows minimal narrative literature in between 2024 and 2005. Furthermore, this narrative review highlights the potential approaches for detecting anthrax infection, establishing suitable protocols for prevention, and focusing on the current epidemiology and available therapeutics, vaccine and its future developmental strategies for the prevention of infectious disorder.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炭疽:叙述性综述
炭疽杆菌是一种人畜共患病菌,主要导致人类炭疽病,并有可能在全球范围内爆发。食草动物是该疾病的固有贮藏库,而所有内热物种都容易感染。人类因接触患病动物或动物产品,或食用或处理受感染的肉类而无意中感染该疾病。目前还没有报告数据显示炭疽病在人与人之间传播,这也无法保证细菌的变异和新的传播途径。然而,炭疽菌可导致各种感染,包括眼内炎、菌血症、皮肤感染、中枢神经系统感染和肺炎。因此,研究目前人类炭疽在人口稠密国家的流行病学状况至关重要,包括改变的症状、人的适应症和传播方式。本文重点介绍了目前人类炭疽的诊断方法,进一步探讨了现有的治疗方案以及治疗方案的未来前景。本综述是在 "PubMed"、"ScienceDirect"、"ClinicalTrials.gov "和网络报告中使用 "AND "作为布尔运算符和搜索关键词(即 "炭疽 "和 "感染"、"炭疽 "和 "大流行"、"炭疽 "和 "传染病"、"炭疽 "和 "疫苗"、"炭疽 "和 "诊断")进行简单搜索后得出的结果,显示 2024 年至 2005 年间的文献叙述极少。此外,这篇叙述性综述还强调了检测炭疽感染的潜在方法、制定合适的预防方案,并重点介绍了当前的流行病学和可用疗法、疫苗及其未来发展战略,以预防传染性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbes and New Infections
New Microbes and New Infections Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
91
审稿时长
114 days
期刊最新文献
Concerns and implications of Oropouche virus infection during pregnancy: A call for further research and public health action How a GPT-aided survey reveals a medical student's misunderstanding of the term 'artemisinin resistance' Mystery flu-like outbreak raises another alarm in Congo: The next disease X? Assessment of inappropriate use of antibiotics and contributing factors in Awi Administrative Zone, Northwestern Amhara regional State, Ethiopia Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1