New appeals court case finds Title II does not allow for emotional distress damages

Marc Charmatz Esq.
{"title":"New appeals court case finds Title II does not allow for emotional distress damages","authors":"Marc Charmatz Esq.","doi":"10.1002/dhe.31844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <i>Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C</i>, 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not available under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794), a statute enacted pursuant to the spending clause of the United States Constitution. The Court left open the question of whether emotional distress damages are available under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12135-65).</p>","PeriodicalId":100378,"journal":{"name":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","volume":"30 4","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C, 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not available under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794), a statute enacted pursuant to the spending clause of the United States Constitution. The Court left open the question of whether emotional distress damages are available under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12135-65).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上诉法院的新案例认定《第二编》不允许精神损害赔偿
在 "Cummings 诉 Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C "一案(142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022))中,美国最高法院认为,根据《康复法》第 504 条(29 U.S.C. 794),不能获得精神损害赔偿,该法是根据《美国宪法》的支出条款颁布的。法院对《美国残疾人法》(Americans with Disabilities Act)第二章(42 U.S.C. 12135-65)是否提供精神损害赔偿的问题保持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Board enters into resolution agreement Distinguishing stop-the-clock breaks from general extended time accommodations Research finds that tweaks to forms can increase employee disclosure rates OCR concerned with college's implementation of accommodations OCR concerned with university's failure to implement accommodations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1