Choice of supraglottic airway devices: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract

Background

Over the last two decades, significant research interest has led to the development of a wide variety of supraglottic airways (SGAs) for anaesthesia providers to choose from.

Methods

In this network meta-analysis, we analysed 111 studies, enrolling 12 045 patients undergoing airway management with 29 SGAs. We targeted outcomes that contribute to clinicians' choice of one SGA over another. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST). Secondary outcomes were first-attempt insertion success, bleeding complications, and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). Based on credible intervals, we created a ‘rank order’ to guide decision-making for clinicians.

Results

The highest-ranking devices based on credible intervals for POST, bleeding complications, first-attempt insertion success, and OLP were LMA Ambu, Jcerity Endoscoper, LMA Blockbuster, and LMA Baska Mask, respectively. Air-Q and i-gel ranked favourably across multiple outcomes, with i-gel being the only device to rank within the top six SGAs for POST, bleeding, and first-attempt success despite ranking poorly for OLP.

Conclusions

Our data support the use of LMA-Ambu, Jcerity-Endoscoper, Air-Q, and i-gel when considering patient-centred outcomes. Clinician familiarity with these devices and their continued expansion into anaesthetic practice will have important implications on the perioperative patient experience.

Systematic review protocol

PROSPERO (CRD42022383136).