Failure to Rescue Female Patients Undergoing High-Risk Surgery.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4574
Catherine M Wagner,Karen E Joynt Maddox,Gorav Ailawadi,Andrew M Ibrahim
{"title":"Failure to Rescue Female Patients Undergoing High-Risk Surgery.","authors":"Catherine M Wagner,Karen E Joynt Maddox,Gorav Ailawadi,Andrew M Ibrahim","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nFemale patients have higher mortality rates after high-risk surgery than male patients. It is unknown whether this mortality gap is due to different rates of postoperative complications or if complications are addressed differently by sex, causing complications to lead to death-so-called failure to rescue.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo evaluate sex differences in failure to rescue across high-risk surgical procedures.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Medicare beneficiaries from October 2015 to February 2020 who underwent high-risk vascular or cardiac surgical procedures, including abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement or repair. Data analysis was performed from August 2023 to March 2024.\r\n\r\nExposures\r\nThe primary exposure was patient sex.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary outcomes were risk-adjusted rates of complications, 30-day mortality, and failure to rescue, which was defined as a death occurring after a serious complication. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions and compared using χ2 analysis. Continuous variables were tested for normality and compared using a t test.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nA total of 863 305 Medicare beneficiaries were included in this study cohort, of whom 304 176 (35.2%) were female. Mean (SD) age was slightly higher in female patients (74.8 [9.3] years) than male patients (73.4 [8.5] years), and female patients had more comorbidities than male patients (≥2 Elixhauser comorbidities, female: 262 809 [86.4%] vs male: 465 231 [83.2%]). Female patients were more likely to receive care at large hospitals and hospitals with a higher surgical case volume. Overall, female and male patients had similar rates of complications (female: 14.98% vs male: 14.37%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .001). However, female patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (female: 4.22% vs male: 3.34%; aRR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.29; P < .001) and higher rates of failure to rescue (female: 10.71% vs male: 8.58%; aRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.28; P < .001). A similar pattern was observed when stratified by each procedure.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn this cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing high-risk surgery, male and female patients experienced similar rates of serious complications, but female patients with complications were more likely to die. In other words, clinicians fail to rescue female patients with complications after high-risk surgery more often than male patients. Improving the recognition and management of female patients' complications postoperatively may narrow the sex disparity after high-risk surgery.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Female patients have higher mortality rates after high-risk surgery than male patients. It is unknown whether this mortality gap is due to different rates of postoperative complications or if complications are addressed differently by sex, causing complications to lead to death-so-called failure to rescue. Objective To evaluate sex differences in failure to rescue across high-risk surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Medicare beneficiaries from October 2015 to February 2020 who underwent high-risk vascular or cardiac surgical procedures, including abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement or repair. Data analysis was performed from August 2023 to March 2024. Exposures The primary exposure was patient sex. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were risk-adjusted rates of complications, 30-day mortality, and failure to rescue, which was defined as a death occurring after a serious complication. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions and compared using χ2 analysis. Continuous variables were tested for normality and compared using a t test. Results A total of 863 305 Medicare beneficiaries were included in this study cohort, of whom 304 176 (35.2%) were female. Mean (SD) age was slightly higher in female patients (74.8 [9.3] years) than male patients (73.4 [8.5] years), and female patients had more comorbidities than male patients (≥2 Elixhauser comorbidities, female: 262 809 [86.4%] vs male: 465 231 [83.2%]). Female patients were more likely to receive care at large hospitals and hospitals with a higher surgical case volume. Overall, female and male patients had similar rates of complications (female: 14.98% vs male: 14.37%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .001). However, female patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (female: 4.22% vs male: 3.34%; aRR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.29; P < .001) and higher rates of failure to rescue (female: 10.71% vs male: 8.58%; aRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.28; P < .001). A similar pattern was observed when stratified by each procedure. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing high-risk surgery, male and female patients experienced similar rates of serious complications, but female patients with complications were more likely to die. In other words, clinicians fail to rescue female patients with complications after high-risk surgery more often than male patients. Improving the recognition and management of female patients' complications postoperatively may narrow the sex disparity after high-risk surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抢救接受高风险手术的女性患者失败。
重要性女性患者在高风险手术后的死亡率高于男性患者。目前尚不清楚这种死亡率差距是由于术后并发症的发生率不同,还是由于不同性别对并发症的处理方式不同,导致并发症导致死亡--即所谓的抢救失败。目的评估高风险外科手术中抢救失败的性别差异。设计、设置和参与者这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2015 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受高风险血管或心脏手术(包括腹主动脉瘤修补术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、主动脉瓣置换术和二尖瓣置换术或修补术)的医疗保险受益人的数据。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是风险调整后的并发症发生率、30 天死亡率和抢救失败率,抢救失败率定义为严重并发症发生后的死亡。分类变量以频率和比例表示,并使用χ2分析进行比较。连续变量进行了正态性检验,并采用 t 检验进行比较。结果共有 863 305 名医疗保险受益人被纳入本研究队列,其中女性 304 176 人(35.2%)。女性患者的平均(标清)年龄(74.8 [9.3]岁)略高于男性患者(73.4 [8.5]岁),女性患者的合并症多于男性患者(≥2 项 Elixhauser 合并症,女性:262 809 [86.4%] vs 男性:465 231 [83.2%])。女性患者更有可能在大型医院和手术量较大的医院接受治疗。总体而言,女性和男性患者的并发症发生率相似(女性:14.98% vs 男性:14.37%;调整后相对风险 [aRR],1.04;95% CI,1.03-1.05;P < .001)。然而,女性患者的 30 天死亡率更高(女性:4.22% vs 男性:3.34%;aRR,1.26;95% CI,1.23-1.29;P < .001),抢救失败率更高(女性:10.71% vs 男性:8.58%;aRR,1.25;95% CI,1.22-1.28;P < .001)。在这项对接受高风险手术的医疗保险受益人进行的队列研究中,男性和女性患者的严重并发症发生率相似,但出现并发症的女性患者更有可能死亡。换句话说,临床医生对高风险手术后出现并发症的女性患者的抢救失败率高于男性患者。改善对女性患者术后并发症的识别和处理,可以缩小高风险手术后的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Facility Medicaid Burden and Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection-Related Mortality. Issues With the New Liver Allocation System. Prophylactic Drain Placement and Postoperative Invasive Procedures After Gastrectomy: The Abdominal Drain After Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Randomized Clinical Trial. Refrain From the Drain? The ADIGE Trial Brings Gastrectomy to the Debate. Risk Factors for Metabolic Disease in Veterans: Beyond BMI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1