Polygenic risk scores stratify breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease.

Mark E Sherman,Stacey J Winham,Robert A Vierkant,Bryan M Mccauley,Christopher G Scott,Sarah Schrup,Mia M Gaudet,Melissa A Troester,Sandhya Pruthi,Derek C Radisky,Amy C Degnim,Fergus J Couch,Manjeet K Bolla,Qin Wang,Joe Dennis,Kyriaki Michailidou,Pascal Guenel,Therese Truong,Jenny Chang-Claude,Nadia Obi,Kristan J Aronson,Rachel Murphy,Montserrat Garcia-Closas,Stephen Chanock,Thomas Ahearn,Xiaohong Yang,Alison M Dunning,Nasim Mavaddat,Paul D P Pharoah,Douglas F Easton,Celine M Vachon
{"title":"Polygenic risk scores stratify breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease.","authors":"Mark E Sherman,Stacey J Winham,Robert A Vierkant,Bryan M Mccauley,Christopher G Scott,Sarah Schrup,Mia M Gaudet,Melissa A Troester,Sandhya Pruthi,Derek C Radisky,Amy C Degnim,Fergus J Couch,Manjeet K Bolla,Qin Wang,Joe Dennis,Kyriaki Michailidou,Pascal Guenel,Therese Truong,Jenny Chang-Claude,Nadia Obi,Kristan J Aronson,Rachel Murphy,Montserrat Garcia-Closas,Stephen Chanock,Thomas Ahearn,Xiaohong Yang,Alison M Dunning,Nasim Mavaddat,Paul D P Pharoah,Douglas F Easton,Celine M Vachon","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nMost breast biopsies are diagnosed as benign breast disease (BBD), with 1.5- to fourfold increased breast cancer (BC) risk. Apart from pathologic diagnoses of atypical hyperplasia, few factors aid in BC risk assessment of these patients. We assessed whether a 313-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS) stratifies risk of BBD patients.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nWe pooled data from five Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control studies (mean age = 59.9 years), including 6,706 cases and 8,488 controls. Using logistic regression, we estimated BC risk associations by self-reported BBD history and strata of PRS, with median PRS category among women without BBD as the referent. We assessed interactions and mediation of BBD and PRS with BC risk.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nBBD history was associated with increased BC risk (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.37-1.60; p < .001). PRS increased BC risk, irrespective of BBD history (p-interaction = 0.48), with minimal evidence of mediation of either factor by the other. Women with BBD and PRS in the highest tertile had over 2-fold increased odds of BC (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 2.41-3.09) and those with BBD and PRS in the lowest tertile experienced reduced BC risk (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91), compared to the reference group. Women with BBD and PRS in the highest decile had a 3.7- fold increase (95% CI: 3.00-4.61) compared to those with median PRS without BBD.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBC risks are elevated among women with BBD and increase progressively with PRS, suggesting that optimal combinations of these factors may improve risk stratification.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Most breast biopsies are diagnosed as benign breast disease (BBD), with 1.5- to fourfold increased breast cancer (BC) risk. Apart from pathologic diagnoses of atypical hyperplasia, few factors aid in BC risk assessment of these patients. We assessed whether a 313-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS) stratifies risk of BBD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We pooled data from five Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control studies (mean age = 59.9 years), including 6,706 cases and 8,488 controls. Using logistic regression, we estimated BC risk associations by self-reported BBD history and strata of PRS, with median PRS category among women without BBD as the referent. We assessed interactions and mediation of BBD and PRS with BC risk. RESULTS BBD history was associated with increased BC risk (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.37-1.60; p < .001). PRS increased BC risk, irrespective of BBD history (p-interaction = 0.48), with minimal evidence of mediation of either factor by the other. Women with BBD and PRS in the highest tertile had over 2-fold increased odds of BC (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 2.41-3.09) and those with BBD and PRS in the lowest tertile experienced reduced BC risk (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91), compared to the reference group. Women with BBD and PRS in the highest decile had a 3.7- fold increase (95% CI: 3.00-4.61) compared to those with median PRS without BBD. CONCLUSION BC risks are elevated among women with BBD and increase progressively with PRS, suggesting that optimal combinations of these factors may improve risk stratification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多基因风险评分可对患有良性乳腺疾病的妇女的乳腺癌风险进行分层。
目的大多数乳腺活检结果都被诊断为良性乳腺疾病(BBD),其乳腺癌(BC)风险增加了 1.5 到 4 倍。除了非典型增生的病理诊断外,很少有因素有助于对这些患者进行乳腺癌风险评估。我们评估了 313-SNP 多基因风险评分(PRS)是否能对 BBD 患者的风险进行分层。患者和方法我们汇总了来自五项乳腺癌协会联盟病例对照研究(平均年龄 = 59.9 岁)的数据,其中包括 6706 例病例和 8488 例对照。我们使用逻辑回归法,以无 BBD 妇女的 PRS 类别中位数为参照,根据自述的 BBD 病史和 PRS 分层估算了 BC 风险相关性。我们评估了BBD和PRS与BC风险的交互作用和中介作用。结果BBD病史与BC风险增加有关(OR = 1.48,95% CI:1.37-1.60;p < .001)。无论是否有 BBD 史,PRS 都会增加 BC 风险(p-交互作用 = 0.48),只有极少证据表明任何一个因素对另一个因素有中介作用。与参照组相比,BBD和PRS均为最高三分位数的妇女发生BC的几率增加了2倍多(OR = 2.73,95% CI:2.41-3.09),而BBD和PRS均为最低三分位数的妇女发生BC的风险降低了(OR = 0.79,95% CI:0.70-0.91)。结论 患有BBD且PRS处于最高十分位数的女性与PRS处于中位数且无BBD的女性相比,BC风险增加了3.7倍(95% CI:3.00-4.61)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1