Off-grid PV/biomass/DG/battery hybrid renewable energy as a source of electricity for a farm facility

Michael Uzoamaka Emezirinwune , Isaiah Adediji Adejumobi , Oluwaseun Ibrahim Adebisi , Festus Gboyega Akinboro
{"title":"Off-grid PV/biomass/DG/battery hybrid renewable energy as a source of electricity for a farm facility","authors":"Michael Uzoamaka Emezirinwune ,&nbsp;Isaiah Adediji Adejumobi ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Ibrahim Adebisi ,&nbsp;Festus Gboyega Akinboro","doi":"10.1016/j.prime.2024.100808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reliable, cost-effective energy systems are pivotal for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. Using the energy balance analysis of the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER), this study presents a techno-economic assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system for a farm facility. The energy system components considered in the analysis include solar photovoltaics, wind turbines, diesel generators, biomass, and battery storage. The results shows that ten feasible energy systems can technically power the typical farm facility, with a PV-Biomass-DG battery being the best in terms of the total net present cost. The PV-Biomass-DG-battery systems consist of 561.023 kW of PV, 88 kW of diesel generator, 10 kW of biomass, 81 kW of converter, and 584 batteries operated in a load-following mode. When the cost of energy (COE) of EA1 0.206325 $/kWh is compared to EA7 0.407681 $/kWh, a difference of $0.201356 will be saved for every kWh. Also, a comparison of the operating cost of EA1, $65,713.23 and the operating cost of EA7 $212,027.4 showed a margin of $146,314.17 being saved. Energy systems EA3 and EA4 had the lowest carbon dioxide production levels of 15.8 kg annually, respectively. The simple payback period metrics increased from EA1 to EA6 between 2.97 years to 6.99 years. The result of the study shows that adopting a low-carbon energy transition is technically and economically viable for the agricultural sector, especially in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100488,"journal":{"name":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100808"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772671124003887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable, cost-effective energy systems are pivotal for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. Using the energy balance analysis of the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER), this study presents a techno-economic assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system for a farm facility. The energy system components considered in the analysis include solar photovoltaics, wind turbines, diesel generators, biomass, and battery storage. The results shows that ten feasible energy systems can technically power the typical farm facility, with a PV-Biomass-DG battery being the best in terms of the total net present cost. The PV-Biomass-DG-battery systems consist of 561.023 kW of PV, 88 kW of diesel generator, 10 kW of biomass, 81 kW of converter, and 584 batteries operated in a load-following mode. When the cost of energy (COE) of EA1 0.206325 $/kWh is compared to EA7 0.407681 $/kWh, a difference of $0.201356 will be saved for every kWh. Also, a comparison of the operating cost of EA1, $65,713.23 and the operating cost of EA7 $212,027.4 showed a margin of $146,314.17 being saved. Energy systems EA3 and EA4 had the lowest carbon dioxide production levels of 15.8 kg annually, respectively. The simple payback period metrics increased from EA1 to EA6 between 2.97 years to 6.99 years. The result of the study shows that adopting a low-carbon energy transition is technically and economically viable for the agricultural sector, especially in developing countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离网光伏/生物质/DG/电池混合可再生能源作为农场设施的电力来源
可靠、经济高效的能源系统对于农业部门的可持续发展至关重要。本研究利用可再生能源混合优化模型(HOMER)的能量平衡分析,对一个农场设施的混合可再生能源系统进行了技术经济评估。分析中考虑的能源系统组件包括太阳能光伏发电、风力涡轮机、柴油发电机、生物质能和电池储能。结果表明,有十种可行的能源系统可以从技术上为典型的农场设施提供电力,其中光伏-生物质-DG 电池在总净现值成本方面最优。光伏-生物质-DG-电池系统包括 561.023 千瓦的光伏发电、88 千瓦的柴油发电机、10 千瓦的生物质发电、81 千瓦的变流器和 584 个以负载跟随模式运行的电池。当 EA1 的能源成本(COE)为 0.206325 美元/千瓦时与 EA7 的 0.407681 美元/千瓦时相比时,每千瓦时可节省 0.201356 美元。此外,EA1 的运行成本为 65,713.23 美元,而 EA7 的运行成本为 212,027.4 美元,两者相比较,可节省 146,314.17 美元。能源系统 EA3 和 EA4 的二氧化碳年产量最低,分别为 15.8 千克。从 EA1 到 EA6 的简单投资回收期指标从 2.97 年增加到 6.99 年。研究结果表明,对于农业部门,尤其是发展中国家的农业部门来说,采用低碳能源转型在技术和经济上都是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modular nine-level single-phase inverter with quadruple voltage gain using reduced blocking voltage switches Identification of multiple power quality disturbances in hybrid microgrid using deep stacked auto-encoder based bi-directional LSTM classifier Exponential function LMS and fractional order pid based voltage power quality enhancement in distribution network A new discrete GaN-based dv/dt control circuit for megahertz frequency power converters Anomaly detection of adversarial cyber attacks on electric vehicle charging stations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1