A risk-based model for human-artificial intelligence conflict resolution in process systems

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Digital Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.dche.2024.100194
He Wen , Faisal Khan
{"title":"A risk-based model for human-artificial intelligence conflict resolution in process systems","authors":"He Wen ,&nbsp;Faisal Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2024.100194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conflicts stemming from discrepancies between human and artificial intelligence (AI) in observation, interpretation, and action have gained attention. Recent publications highlight the seriousness of the concern stemming from conflict and models to identify and assess the conflict risk. No work has been reported on systematically studying how to resolve human and artificial intelligence conflicts. This paper presents a novel approach to model the resolution strategies of human-AI conflicts. This approach reinterprets the conventional human conflict resolution mechanisms within AI. The study proposes a unique mathematical model to quantify conflict risks and delineate effective resolution strategies to minimize conflict risk. The proposed approach and mode are applied to control a two-phase separator system, a major component of a processing facility. The proposed approach promotes the development of robust AI systems with enhanced real-time responses to human inputs. It provides a platform to foster human-AI collaborative engagement and a mechanism of intelligence augmentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508124000565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conflicts stemming from discrepancies between human and artificial intelligence (AI) in observation, interpretation, and action have gained attention. Recent publications highlight the seriousness of the concern stemming from conflict and models to identify and assess the conflict risk. No work has been reported on systematically studying how to resolve human and artificial intelligence conflicts. This paper presents a novel approach to model the resolution strategies of human-AI conflicts. This approach reinterprets the conventional human conflict resolution mechanisms within AI. The study proposes a unique mathematical model to quantify conflict risks and delineate effective resolution strategies to minimize conflict risk. The proposed approach and mode are applied to control a two-phase separator system, a major component of a processing facility. The proposed approach promotes the development of robust AI systems with enhanced real-time responses to human inputs. It provides a platform to foster human-AI collaborative engagement and a mechanism of intelligence augmentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的流程系统中人工智能冲突解决模型
人类与人工智能(AI)在观察、解释和行动方面的差异所产生的冲突已引起人们的关注。最近的出版物强调了冲突所引发的严重问题,以及识别和评估冲突风险的模型。目前还没有关于系统研究如何解决人类与人工智能冲突的报道。本文提出了一种新颖的方法来模拟人类与人工智能冲突的解决策略。这种方法重新诠释了人工智能中传统的人类冲突解决机制。研究提出了一种独特的数学模型,用于量化冲突风险,并划定有效的解决策略,以最大限度地降低冲突风险。所提出的方法和模式被应用于控制一个两相分离器系统,该系统是加工设施的主要组成部分。所提出的方法促进了稳健的人工智能系统的发展,增强了对人类输入的实时响应。它提供了一个促进人类与人工智能协作参与的平台和一种智能增强机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The trust region filter strategy: Survey of a rigorous approach for optimization with surrogate models Multi-agent distributed control of integrated process networks using an adaptive community detection approach Industrial data-driven machine learning soft sensing for optimal operation of etching tools Process integration technique for targeting carbon credit price subsidy Robust simulation and technical evaluation of large-scale gas oil hydrocracking process via extended water-energy-product (E-WEP) analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1