Validity and reliability of the scale for determining nursing students' perceptions of stigmatization

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Archives of Psychiatric Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2024.10.016
Gülşah Kaya , Zeliha Koç
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the scale for determining nursing students' perceptions of stigmatization","authors":"Gülşah Kaya ,&nbsp;Zeliha Koç","doi":"10.1016/j.apnu.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Stigmatization can negatively affect the relationship between the patient and health professional.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The aim of this study was to develop the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The population of the study consisted of 403 nursing students. A literature review and qualitative interviews with 24 students were conducted to generate the initial items. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were applied to examine the construct validity of the scale. The reliability of the scale was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item-total score correlation coefficients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After confirmatory factor analysis, the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization was finalized with 19 items and five sub-dimensions. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale was determined as χ<sup>2</sup>/sd: 2.957; GFI: 0.902; AGFI: 0.869; IFI: 0.906; TLI: 0.937; CFI: 0.905; RMSEA: 0.070; SRMR: 0.063. The reliability of the scale over time was evaluated with the test-retest method, and it was found that the agreement between the responses was very good (ICC: 0.980; p &lt; 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.824.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It was determined that the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization is a short, easy-to-understand, and psychometrically sound measurement tool that can be safely applied to nursing students. Nursing students' perceptions of stigmatization can be determined using this scale. The nursing education curriculum can be restructured in line with the findings obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55466,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 130-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394172400205X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Stigmatization can negatively affect the relationship between the patient and health professional.

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization.

Methods

The population of the study consisted of 403 nursing students. A literature review and qualitative interviews with 24 students were conducted to generate the initial items. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were applied to examine the construct validity of the scale. The reliability of the scale was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item-total score correlation coefficients.

Results

After confirmatory factor analysis, the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization was finalized with 19 items and five sub-dimensions. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale was determined as χ2/sd: 2.957; GFI: 0.902; AGFI: 0.869; IFI: 0.906; TLI: 0.937; CFI: 0.905; RMSEA: 0.070; SRMR: 0.063. The reliability of the scale over time was evaluated with the test-retest method, and it was found that the agreement between the responses was very good (ICC: 0.980; p < 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.824.

Conclusions

It was determined that the Scale for Determining Nursing Students' Perceptions of Stigmatization is a short, easy-to-understand, and psychometrically sound measurement tool that can be safely applied to nursing students. Nursing students' perceptions of stigmatization can be determined using this scale. The nursing education curriculum can be restructured in line with the findings obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定护理专业学生对污名化看法的量表的有效性和可靠性
导言:污名化会对患者与医疗专业人员之间的关系产生负面影响。研究目的:本研究旨在开发 "护理专业学生对污名化的认知量表"。研究方法:研究对象包括 403 名护理专业学生。通过文献综述和对 24 名学生的定性访谈产生了初始项目。研究采用了确认性因子分析和探索性因子分析来检验量表的建构效度。结果经过确认性因素分析,最终确定了护理专业学生对污名化认知的量表,包括 19 个项目和 5 个子维度。在确认性因素分析中,量表的拟合优度分别为:χ2/sd: 2.957; GFI:0.902;AGFI:0.869;IFI:0.906; TLI: 0.937; CFI:0.905;RMSEA:0.070;SRMR:0.063。采用重测法评估了量表在一段时间内的信度,结果发现各应答之间的一致性非常好(ICC:0.980;p <;0.001)。结论 护理专业学生对污名化的认知量表是一种简短、易懂且符合心理测量学原理的测量工具,可以安全地应用于护理专业学生。使用该量表可以确定护理专业学生对污名化的看法。护理教育课程可根据所得结果进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
160 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Psychiatric Nursing disseminates original, peer-reviewed research that is of interest to psychiatric and mental health care nurses. The field is considered in its broadest perspective, including theory, practice and research applications related to all ages, special populations, settings, and interdisciplinary collaborations in both the public and private sectors. Through critical study, expositions, and review of practice, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing is a medium for clinical scholarship to provide theoretical linkages among diverse areas of practice.
期刊最新文献
ISPN News Forging connections: The imperative of global collaboration in behavioral health TOC editor's page/editorial board masthead, subscriber information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1