Radiomics reproducibility in computed tomography through changes of ROI size, resolution, and hounsfield unit: A phantom study

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.003
Y. Soleymani , Z. Valibeiglou , M. Fazel Ghaziani , A. Jahanshahi , D. Khezerloo
{"title":"Radiomics reproducibility in computed tomography through changes of ROI size, resolution, and hounsfield unit: A phantom study","authors":"Y. Soleymani ,&nbsp;Z. Valibeiglou ,&nbsp;M. Fazel Ghaziani ,&nbsp;A. Jahanshahi ,&nbsp;D. Khezerloo","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Although radiomics has revealed an intriguing perspective for quantitative radiology, the impact of scanning parameters on its outcomes must be considered. In this study, the effects of changes in the region of interest (ROI) sizes, Hounsfield Unit (HU), and resolution of computed tomography (CT) on feature reproducibility have been investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The GAMMEX 464 phantom was used to evaluate the reproducibility of radiomics features across different ROI sizes, HU, and resolution. Data were acquired using a consistent system setup, with the phantom repositioned for each scan. The first acquisition series examined the effects of different ROI sizes and resolutions (1, 3, and 5 mm) on feature reproducibility. The second series assessed the impact of different HU and resolution. Segmentation and feature extraction were performed using LIFEx 7.1.0 software, focusing on textural radiomics features. Statistical analysis involved calculating the coefficient of variation (COV) to categorize feature variability. COV &lt;5 % was considered highly stable.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of the 32 textural features studied, the analysis of changes in ROI size with a resolution of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm revealed that 16, 17, and 18 features had high reproducibility, with a COV&lt;5 %. Polyethylene, acrylic, and water also demonstrated stable textural features across changes in scan parameters and image resolutions, with 4 reproducible features in all resolutions. The grey-level run length matrix (GLRLM) and grey-level zone length matrix (GLZLM) radiomics groups were highly stable in the context of variations in scan parameters and different materials.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this study highlight the importance of standardizing radiomics studies to reduce the influence of pre-analysis steps on feature values. This standardization is crucial for guaranteeing the consistency of radiomics features under various imaging conditions. Additional research is required to enhance these results.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>To ensure the reproducibility and reliability of radiomics features, it is imperative to standardize scanning parameters and pre-analysis protocols. This standardization will enhance the consistency of radiomics applications in both clinical and research environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 1629-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Although radiomics has revealed an intriguing perspective for quantitative radiology, the impact of scanning parameters on its outcomes must be considered. In this study, the effects of changes in the region of interest (ROI) sizes, Hounsfield Unit (HU), and resolution of computed tomography (CT) on feature reproducibility have been investigated.

Methods

The GAMMEX 464 phantom was used to evaluate the reproducibility of radiomics features across different ROI sizes, HU, and resolution. Data were acquired using a consistent system setup, with the phantom repositioned for each scan. The first acquisition series examined the effects of different ROI sizes and resolutions (1, 3, and 5 mm) on feature reproducibility. The second series assessed the impact of different HU and resolution. Segmentation and feature extraction were performed using LIFEx 7.1.0 software, focusing on textural radiomics features. Statistical analysis involved calculating the coefficient of variation (COV) to categorize feature variability. COV <5 % was considered highly stable.

Results

Out of the 32 textural features studied, the analysis of changes in ROI size with a resolution of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm revealed that 16, 17, and 18 features had high reproducibility, with a COV<5 %. Polyethylene, acrylic, and water also demonstrated stable textural features across changes in scan parameters and image resolutions, with 4 reproducible features in all resolutions. The grey-level run length matrix (GLRLM) and grey-level zone length matrix (GLZLM) radiomics groups were highly stable in the context of variations in scan parameters and different materials.

Conclusion

The results of this study highlight the importance of standardizing radiomics studies to reduce the influence of pre-analysis steps on feature values. This standardization is crucial for guaranteeing the consistency of radiomics features under various imaging conditions. Additional research is required to enhance these results.

Implications for practice

To ensure the reproducibility and reliability of radiomics features, it is imperative to standardize scanning parameters and pre-analysis protocols. This standardization will enhance the consistency of radiomics applications in both clinical and research environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过改变 ROI 大小、分辨率和 hounsfield 单位实现计算机断层扫描的放射组学再现性:模型研究
导言虽然放射组学为定量放射学提供了一个令人感兴趣的视角,但必须考虑扫描参数对其结果的影响。本研究调查了感兴趣区(ROI)大小、Hounsfield 单位(HU)和计算机断层扫描(CT)分辨率的变化对特征再现性的影响。数据采集采用一致的系统设置,每次扫描都对模型进行重新定位。第一个采集系列检查了不同 ROI 大小和分辨率(1、3 和 5 毫米)对特征再现性的影响。第二个系列评估了不同 HU 和分辨率的影响。分割和特征提取使用 LIFEx 7.1.0 软件进行,重点是纹理放射组学特征。统计分析包括计算变异系数(COV),对特征变异性进行分类。结果在所研究的 32 个纹理特征中,对分辨率为 1 毫米、3 毫米和 5 毫米的 ROI 大小变化的分析表明,16、17 和 18 个特征具有较高的可重复性,COV<5 %。聚乙烯、丙烯酸和水在扫描参数和图像分辨率发生变化时也表现出稳定的纹理特征,在所有分辨率下都有 4 个可重复的特征。在扫描参数和不同材料发生变化的情况下,灰度级运行长度矩阵(GLRLM)和灰度级区域长度矩阵(GLZLM)放射组学组别高度稳定。这种标准化对于保证不同成像条件下放射组学特征的一致性至关重要。为确保放射组学特征的可重复性和可靠性,必须实现扫描参数和预分析方案的标准化。这种标准化将提高放射组学在临床和研究环境中应用的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
"I used their criticisms as my weapon to succeed" Experiences in the dual learning environment of Black, Asian, and ethnically diverse therapeutic radiographer undergraduate students - results of a UK survey. Radiographers' perspective of patient safety at ultrasound units in radiology departments. Uniformity test in three-dimensional rotational angiography: Novel tools and methods for advanced performance evaluation. Co-production of a novel intervention targeting obesity-related barriers to mammographic screening participation. Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1