Perioperative Analgesic Interventions for Reduction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jens Laigaard,Anders Karlsen,Mathias Maagaard,Troels Haxholdt Lunn,Ole Mathiesen,Søren Overgaard
{"title":"Perioperative Analgesic Interventions for Reduction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jens Laigaard,Anders Karlsen,Mathias Maagaard,Troels Haxholdt Lunn,Ole Mathiesen,Søren Overgaard","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nHigh pain levels immediately after surgery have been associated with persistent postsurgical pain. Still, it is uncertain if analgesic treatment of immediate postsurgical pain prevents the development of persistent postsurgical pain.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to September 12, 2023, for randomized controlled trials investigating perioperative analgesic interventions and with reported pain levels 3 to 24 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was pain score 3 to 24 months after surgery, assessed at rest and during movement separately. Two authors independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We conducted meta-analyses and tested their robustness with trial sequential analyses and worst-best and best-worst case analyses.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe included 49 trials with 68 intervention arms. All but 4 trials were at high risk of bias for the primary outcome. Moreover, the included trials were heterogeneous in terms of exclusion criteria, baseline pain severity, and which cointerventions the participants were offered. For pain at rest, no interventions demonstrated a statistically significant difference between intervention and control. For pain during movement, perioperative treatment with duloxetine (7 trials with 641 participants) reduced pain scores at 3 to 24 months after surgery (mean difference -4.9 mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, -6.5 to -3.4] on the 0-100 visual analog scale) compared to placebo. This difference was lower than our predefined threshold for clinical importance of 10 mm.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe found no perioperative analgesic interventions that reduced pain 3 to 24 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The literature on perioperative analgesia focused little on potential long-term effects. We encourage the assessment of long-term pain outcomes.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND High pain levels immediately after surgery have been associated with persistent postsurgical pain. Still, it is uncertain if analgesic treatment of immediate postsurgical pain prevents the development of persistent postsurgical pain. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to September 12, 2023, for randomized controlled trials investigating perioperative analgesic interventions and with reported pain levels 3 to 24 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was pain score 3 to 24 months after surgery, assessed at rest and during movement separately. Two authors independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We conducted meta-analyses and tested their robustness with trial sequential analyses and worst-best and best-worst case analyses. RESULTS We included 49 trials with 68 intervention arms. All but 4 trials were at high risk of bias for the primary outcome. Moreover, the included trials were heterogeneous in terms of exclusion criteria, baseline pain severity, and which cointerventions the participants were offered. For pain at rest, no interventions demonstrated a statistically significant difference between intervention and control. For pain during movement, perioperative treatment with duloxetine (7 trials with 641 participants) reduced pain scores at 3 to 24 months after surgery (mean difference -4.9 mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, -6.5 to -3.4] on the 0-100 visual analog scale) compared to placebo. This difference was lower than our predefined threshold for clinical importance of 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS We found no perioperative analgesic interventions that reduced pain 3 to 24 months after total hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The literature on perioperative analgesia focused little on potential long-term effects. We encourage the assessment of long-term pain outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少全髋关节和膝关节置换术后持续性手术后疼痛的围手术期镇痛干预:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景手术后立即出现的高疼痛水平与手术后持续疼痛有关。我们检索了截至 2023 年 9 月 12 日的 MEDLINE、CENTRAL 和 Embase,以寻找研究骨关节炎患者全髋关节或膝关节置换术后 3 到 24 个月围手术期镇痛干预的随机对照试验。主要研究结果为术后3至24个月的疼痛评分,分别在休息时和运动时进行评估。两位作者独立筛选、提取数据,并使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具评估偏倚风险。我们进行了荟萃分析,并通过试验顺序分析、最差和最佳-最差情况分析检验了其稳健性。除 4 项试验外,其他所有试验的主要结果均存在高偏倚风险。此外,纳入的试验在排除标准、基线疼痛严重程度以及为参与者提供的联合干预措施等方面存在差异。对于静息时的疼痛,没有任何干预措施显示干预与对照之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异。对于运动时的疼痛,与安慰剂相比,围手术期使用度洛西汀(7项试验,641名参与者)可降低术后3至24个月的疼痛评分(0-100视觉模拟量表的平均差异为-4.9毫米[95%置信区间{CI},-6.5至-3.4])。结论 我们没有发现围手术期镇痛干预能减轻骨关节炎全髋关节或膝关节置换术后 3 至 24 个月的疼痛。关于围手术期镇痛的文献很少关注潜在的长期影响。我们鼓励对长期疼痛效果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Large Language Models and the American Board of Anesthesiology Examination In Response Self-Citation in Anesthesiology Journals: Methodology Concerns Optimal Maternal Ventilation During Laparotomy with General Anesthesia in Pregnancy in the Ovine Model Additive and Multiplicative Interactions in Factorial Randomized Trials: What, Why, and How?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1