Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/jan.16544
Saskia Oesch, Lotte Verweij, Marco Riguzzi, Tracy Finch, Rahel Naef
{"title":"Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation","authors":"Saskia Oesch,&nbsp;Lotte Verweij,&nbsp;Marco Riguzzi,&nbsp;Tracy Finch,&nbsp;Rahel Naef","doi":"10.1111/jan.16544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the experience with and progress of the implementation of a Family Support Intervention (FSI) into adult intensive care units (ICUs) as part of the cluster-randomised FICUS trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods process evaluation using a multiple case study approach guided by the normalisation process theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study took place between June 2022 and July 2023 in eight Swiss ICUs randomised to the intervention arm. A tailored implementation strategy was used to introduce the multicomponent FSI, consisting of a new family nursing role and a family care pathway, into interprofessional ICU teams. Participants were 40 ICU key clinical partners. Qualitative data were collected twice, early (3–6 months) and mid-implementation (9–12 months), using small group interviews. A questionnaire with psychometric measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire) was administered at mid-implementation. RITA pragmatic rapid thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Qualitative and quantitative results were then compared across ICUs (cases).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Findings indicated the desired progress of the FSI integration overall and across cases, with high acceptability and appropriateness ratings but only moderate to high feasibility scores. Study-related barriers were noted in all ICUs (i.e., FSI delivery as part of a clinical trial). Implementation barriers included family nurses' limited capacity and clinician's attitudes towards the FSI. Leadership support and interprofessional collaboration were identified as facilitators. Case-based, integrated findings yielded two implementation pathways, namely early and protracted adopters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation barriers were related to the feasibility of FSI delivery within the study context that required a high degree of standardisation and protocol adherence. Implementation progress was shaped by an interprofessional culture of family care, sufficient staff and time resources, and leadership support. The study's findings will inform future implementation of complex health interventions in ICUs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>Good reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Within the FICUS trial, a patient and family advisory board with a patient expert, three family members and a patient with own lived experience of critical care collaborate with the research team.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 11","pages":"7245-7265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16544","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the experience with and progress of the implementation of a Family Support Intervention (FSI) into adult intensive care units (ICUs) as part of the cluster-randomised FICUS trial.

Design

A mixed-methods process evaluation using a multiple case study approach guided by the normalisation process theory.

Methods

This study took place between June 2022 and July 2023 in eight Swiss ICUs randomised to the intervention arm. A tailored implementation strategy was used to introduce the multicomponent FSI, consisting of a new family nursing role and a family care pathway, into interprofessional ICU teams. Participants were 40 ICU key clinical partners. Qualitative data were collected twice, early (3–6 months) and mid-implementation (9–12 months), using small group interviews. A questionnaire with psychometric measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire) was administered at mid-implementation. RITA pragmatic rapid thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Qualitative and quantitative results were then compared across ICUs (cases).

Findings

Findings indicated the desired progress of the FSI integration overall and across cases, with high acceptability and appropriateness ratings but only moderate to high feasibility scores. Study-related barriers were noted in all ICUs (i.e., FSI delivery as part of a clinical trial). Implementation barriers included family nurses' limited capacity and clinician's attitudes towards the FSI. Leadership support and interprofessional collaboration were identified as facilitators. Case-based, integrated findings yielded two implementation pathways, namely early and protracted adopters.

Conclusion

Implementation barriers were related to the feasibility of FSI delivery within the study context that required a high degree of standardisation and protocol adherence. Implementation progress was shaped by an interprofessional culture of family care, sufficient staff and time resources, and leadership support. The study's findings will inform future implementation of complex health interventions in ICUs.

Reporting Method

Good reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS).

Patient or Public Contribution

Within the FICUS trial, a patient and family advisory board with a patient expert, three family members and a patient with own lived experience of critical care collaborate with the research team.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索重症监护病房(FICUS)多成分家庭支持干预研究的实施过程:混合方法过程评估。
目的调查在成人重症监护病房(ICU)中实施家庭支持干预措施(FSI)的经验和进展情况,作为分组随机FICUS试验的一部分。研究采用量身定制的实施策略,将由新的家庭护理角色和家庭护理路径组成的多组件 FSI 引入 ICU 跨专业团队。参与者为 40 名 ICU 主要临床合作伙伴。在实施初期(3-6 个月)和中期(9-12 个月),通过小组访谈收集了两次定性数据。在实施中期进行了心理测量问卷调查(干预可接受性测量、干预可行性测量、干预适宜性测量、规范化测量发展问卷)。采用 RITA 实用快速专题分析和描述性统计来分析数据。研究结果表明,FSI 整合在整体上和各病例中都取得了预期进展,可接受性和适宜性评分较高,但可行性评分仅为中等至高等。所有重症监护病房都存在与研究相关的障碍(即作为临床试验的一部分提供 FSI)。实施障碍包括家庭护士能力有限以及临床医生对 FSI 的态度。领导支持和跨专业合作被认为是促进因素。以案例为基础的综合研究结果得出了两种实施途径,即早期采用者和长期采用者。家庭护理的跨专业文化、充足的人力和时间资源以及领导的支持决定了实施进度。患者或公众贡献在 FICUS 试验中,由一名患者专家、三名家庭成员和一名有重症监护亲身经历的患者组成的患者和家庭咨询委员会与研究团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
From Microfiche to Meta-Analysis: How Literature Reviewing Changed. Redefining Nursing Leadership: A Multilevel Competency Framework for Future Healthcare Challenges. Relatives' Experiences of Circulatory Death Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Their Hypothetical Perspectives on Organ Donation: A Qualitative Study. Experiences of LGBTQ + Healthcare Providers in Workplaces in Taiwan: A Cross‐Sectional Survey The effects of clinical learning environment and career adaptability on resilience: A mediating analysis based on a survey of nursing interns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1