Clinician-Reported Negative Symptom Scales: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbae168
Lucia Weigel, Sophia Wehr, Silvana Galderisi, Armida Mucci, John M Davis, Stefan Leucht
{"title":"Clinician-Reported Negative Symptom Scales: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties","authors":"Lucia Weigel, Sophia Wehr, Silvana Galderisi, Armida Mucci, John M Davis, Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are correlated with reduction of normal function and lower quality of life. They were newly defined by the NIMH-MATRICS Consensus in 2005, dividing the rating tools to assess them into first-generation scales, developed before the Consensus, and second-generation scales, based on the recently introduced definitions. Methods The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews were used to evaluate the quality of psychometric data of the first-generation scales that cover the 5 negative symptom domains of the NIMHS Consensus: the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the High Royds Evaluation of Negativity Scale (HEN), and the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16). Results The search strategy resulted in the inclusion of a total of 13 articles, 7 for the SANS, 4 for the NSA-16, and 2 for the HEN. For the SANS and the NSA-16, the overall results of the scales’ measurement properties are mostly insufficient or indeterminate. The quality of evidence for the HEN is poor, due to a small number of validation studies/included patients. Conclusions After applying the COSMIN guidelines, we do not recommend the usage of these first-generation scales to rate negative symptoms. At the minimum they require further validation.","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are correlated with reduction of normal function and lower quality of life. They were newly defined by the NIMH-MATRICS Consensus in 2005, dividing the rating tools to assess them into first-generation scales, developed before the Consensus, and second-generation scales, based on the recently introduced definitions. Methods The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews were used to evaluate the quality of psychometric data of the first-generation scales that cover the 5 negative symptom domains of the NIMHS Consensus: the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the High Royds Evaluation of Negativity Scale (HEN), and the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16). Results The search strategy resulted in the inclusion of a total of 13 articles, 7 for the SANS, 4 for the NSA-16, and 2 for the HEN. For the SANS and the NSA-16, the overall results of the scales’ measurement properties are mostly insufficient or indeterminate. The quality of evidence for the HEN is poor, due to a small number of validation studies/included patients. Conclusions After applying the COSMIN guidelines, we do not recommend the usage of these first-generation scales to rate negative symptoms. At the minimum they require further validation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生报告的消极症状量表:测量特性系统回顾
背景 精神分裂症的阴性症状与正常功能减退和生活质量下降有关。2005年,NIMH-MATRICS共识对阴性症状进行了新的定义,并将评估阴性症状的评分工具分为第一代量表和第二代量表,第一代量表是在共识达成之前开发的,第二代量表则是根据最近引入的定义开发的。方法 采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)系统综述指南来评估第一代量表的心理测量数据质量,这些量表涵盖了 NIMHS 共识中的 5 个阴性症状领域:阴性症状评估量表 (SANS)、高罗伊斯阴性评估量表 (HEN) 和阴性症状评估-16 (NSA-16)。结果 搜索策略共纳入 13 篇文章,其中 SANS 7 篇,NSA-16 4 篇,HEN 2 篇。对于 SANS 和 NSA-16,量表测量属性的总体结果大多不充分或不确定。HEN 的证据质量较差,原因是验证研究/纳入患者的数量较少。结论 在应用 COSMIN 指南后,我们不建议使用这些第一代量表来评定阴性症状。它们至少需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Electroconvulsive Therapy’s Impact on Retinal Structures in First-Episode Psychosis Patients Using Optical Coherence Tomography Correction to: Exploring the Interactions Between Psychotic Symptoms, Cognition, and Environmental Risk Factors: A Bayesian Analysis of Networks. ”Short” Versus “Long” Duration of Untreated Psychosis in People with First-Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Baseline Status and Follow-Up Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Contrast Sensitivity in Schizophrenia. Psychotic Experiences and Risk of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Population Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1