Validation of a breast cancer assay for radiotherapy omission: an individual participant data meta-analysis

Per Karlsson, Anthony Fyles, S Laura Chang, Bradley Arrick, Frederick L Baehner, Per Malmström, Mårtin Fernö, Erik Holmberg, Martin Sjöström, Fei-Fei Liu, David A Cameron, Linda J Williams, John Ms Bartlett, Joanna Dunlop, Jacqueline Caldwell, Joseph F Loane, Elizabeth Mallon, Tammy Piper, Ian Kunkler, Felix Y Feng, Corey W Speers, Lori J Pierce, John P Bennett, Karen J Taylor
{"title":"Validation of a breast cancer assay for radiotherapy omission: an individual participant data meta-analysis","authors":"Per Karlsson, Anthony Fyles, S Laura Chang, Bradley Arrick, Frederick L Baehner, Per Malmström, Mårtin Fernö, Erik Holmberg, Martin Sjöström, Fei-Fei Liu, David A Cameron, Linda J Williams, John Ms Bartlett, Joanna Dunlop, Jacqueline Caldwell, Joseph F Loane, Elizabeth Mallon, Tammy Piper, Ian Kunkler, Felix Y Feng, Corey W Speers, Lori J Pierce, John P Bennett, Karen J Taylor","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There are currently no molecular tests to identify individual breast cancers where radiotherapy (RT) offers no benefit. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify low risk cancers where RT will not further reduce recurrence rates. Methods An individual participant data meta-analysis was performed in 623 cases of node-negative ER+/HER2-negative early breast cancer enrolled in three RT randomized trials for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model on time to locoregional recurrence (LRR) was used to test the interaction between POLAR score and RT. Results 429 (69%) patients’ tumors had a high POLAR score and 194 (31%) had a low score. Patients with high POLAR score had, in the absence of RT, a 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 20% (15%-26%) vs 5% (2%-11%) for those with a low score. Patients with a high POLAR score had a large benefit from RT (hazard ratio [HR] for RT vs no RT: 0.37 [0.23-0.60], p < .001). In contrast, there was no evidence of benefit from RT for patients with a low POLAR score (HR: 0.92 [0.42-2.02], p = .832). The test for interaction between RT and POLAR was statistically significant (p = .022). Conclusions POLAR is not only prognostic for locoregional recurrence but also predictive of benefit from radiotherapy in selected patients. Patients ≥ 50 years with ER+/HER2-negative disease and a low POLAR score could consider omitting adjuvant RT. Further validation in contemporary clinical cohorts is required.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are currently no molecular tests to identify individual breast cancers where radiotherapy (RT) offers no benefit. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify low risk cancers where RT will not further reduce recurrence rates. Methods An individual participant data meta-analysis was performed in 623 cases of node-negative ER+/HER2-negative early breast cancer enrolled in three RT randomized trials for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model on time to locoregional recurrence (LRR) was used to test the interaction between POLAR score and RT. Results 429 (69%) patients’ tumors had a high POLAR score and 194 (31%) had a low score. Patients with high POLAR score had, in the absence of RT, a 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 20% (15%-26%) vs 5% (2%-11%) for those with a low score. Patients with a high POLAR score had a large benefit from RT (hazard ratio [HR] for RT vs no RT: 0.37 [0.23-0.60], p < .001). In contrast, there was no evidence of benefit from RT for patients with a low POLAR score (HR: 0.92 [0.42-2.02], p = .832). The test for interaction between RT and POLAR was statistically significant (p = .022). Conclusions POLAR is not only prognostic for locoregional recurrence but also predictive of benefit from radiotherapy in selected patients. Patients ≥ 50 years with ER+/HER2-negative disease and a low POLAR score could consider omitting adjuvant RT. Further validation in contemporary clinical cohorts is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌放疗遗漏检测的验证:个体参与者数据荟萃分析
背景 目前还没有分子检测方法可以识别放疗(RT)无益的个别乳腺癌。局部辅助放疗遗漏概况(POLAR)是一种 16 个基因的分子特征,用于识别放疗不会进一步降低复发率的低风险癌症。方法 对参加三项局部辅助放疗随机试验的 623 例结节阴性 ER+/HER2 阴性早期乳腺癌患者的个人数据进行荟萃分析,这些患者的原发肿瘤材料可供分析。采用局部区域复发(LRR)时间的 Cox 比例危险模型来检验 POLAR 评分与 RT 之间的交互作用。结果 429 例(69%)患者的肿瘤 POLAR 得分较高,194 例(31%)得分较低。在未进行 RT 的情况下,POLAR 得分高的患者 10 年 LRR 累积发生率为 20% (15%-26%) ,得分低的患者为 5% (2%-11%)。POLAR评分高的患者从RT中获益匪浅(RT与无RT的危险比[HR]:0.37 [0.23-0.60],p < .001)。相比之下,没有证据表明 POLAR 评分低的患者从 RT 中获益(HR:0.92 [0.42-2.02],p = .832)。RT 与 POLAR 之间的交互作用检验具有统计学意义(p = .022)。结论 POLAR 不仅是局部复发的预后指标,还能预测特定患者从放疗中获益的情况。年龄≥50岁、ER+/HER2阴性且POLAR评分较低的患者可考虑放弃辅助RT治疗。需要在当代临床队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1