Management of vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir: a retrospective comparative effectiveness study of mortality in US hospitals

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae512
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Mark Berry, Paul E Sax, Paul Loubet, Yohei Doi, Alpesh N Amin, Neera Ahuja, Veronika Müller, Roman Casciano, Martin Kolditz
{"title":"Management of vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir: a retrospective comparative effectiveness study of mortality in US hospitals","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Mark Berry, Paul E Sax, Paul Loubet, Yohei Doi, Alpesh N Amin, Neera Ahuja, Veronika Müller, Roman Casciano, Martin Kolditz","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background COVID-19 remains a major public health concern, with continued resurgences of cases and substantial risk of mortality for hospitalized patients. Remdesivir has become standard-of-care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Given the continued evolution of the disease, clinical management relies on evidence from the current endemic period. Methods Using the PINC AI Healthcare database, effectiveness of remdesivir was evaluated among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Three cohorts were analysed: adults, elderly (≥65 years), and those with documented COVID-19 pneumonia. Analyses were stratified by oxygen requirements. Patients receiving remdesivir were matched to those not receiving remdesivir using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine in-hospital mortality. Results 169,965 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 were included, of which 94,129 (55.4%) initiated remdesivir in the first two days of hospitalization. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate as compared to no remdesivir among patients with no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc) (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.75 [0.69-0.82]; 28-day, 0.77 [0.72-0.83]) and among those with supplemental oxygen charges (SOc): 14-day, 0.76 [0.72-0.81]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.74-0.83]) (p<0.0001, for all). Similar findings were observed for elderly patients and those hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusions This evidence builds on learnings from randomized controlled trials from the pandemic era to inform clinical practices. Remdesivir was associated with significant reduction in mortality for hospitalized patients including the elderly and those with COVID-19 pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae512","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background COVID-19 remains a major public health concern, with continued resurgences of cases and substantial risk of mortality for hospitalized patients. Remdesivir has become standard-of-care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Given the continued evolution of the disease, clinical management relies on evidence from the current endemic period. Methods Using the PINC AI Healthcare database, effectiveness of remdesivir was evaluated among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Three cohorts were analysed: adults, elderly (≥65 years), and those with documented COVID-19 pneumonia. Analyses were stratified by oxygen requirements. Patients receiving remdesivir were matched to those not receiving remdesivir using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine in-hospital mortality. Results 169,965 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 were included, of which 94,129 (55.4%) initiated remdesivir in the first two days of hospitalization. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate as compared to no remdesivir among patients with no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc) (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.75 [0.69-0.82]; 28-day, 0.77 [0.72-0.83]) and among those with supplemental oxygen charges (SOc): 14-day, 0.76 [0.72-0.81]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.74-0.83]) (p<0.0001, for all). Similar findings were observed for elderly patients and those hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusions This evidence builds on learnings from randomized controlled trials from the pandemic era to inform clinical practices. Remdesivir was associated with significant reduction in mortality for hospitalized patients including the elderly and those with COVID-19 pneumonia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用雷米地韦对因 COVID-19 住院的易感患者进行管理:美国医院死亡率回顾性比较效果研究
背景 COVID-19 仍是一个重大的公共卫生问题,病例持续复发,住院患者有很大的死亡风险。雷米地韦已成为 COVID-19 住院患者的标准治疗方案。鉴于该疾病的持续发展,临床管理需要依靠当前流行期的证据。方法 利用 PINC AI Healthcare 数据库,评估了 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 2 月期间初诊为 COVID-19 的住院成人使用雷米替韦的效果。分析了三个组群:成人、老年人(≥65 岁)和有记录的 COVID-19 肺炎患者。分析按氧气需求进行分层。使用倾向得分匹配法将接受雷米替韦治疗的患者与未接受雷米替韦治疗的患者进行配对。采用 Cox 比例危险度模型检测院内死亡率。结果 纳入了 169,965 名因 COVID-19 住院的成人,其中 94,129 人(55.4%)在住院头两天开始使用雷米替韦。与未使用雷米替韦相比,未使用补充氧气(NSOc)的患者死亡率明显降低(aHR [95% CI]:14 天,0.75 [0.69-0.82];28 天,0.77 [0.72-0.83]),使用补充氧气(SOc)的患者死亡率也明显降低(aHR [95% CI]:14 天,0.76 [0.72-0.83];28 天,0.77 [0.72-0.83]):14天,0.76 [0.72-0.81];28天,0.79 [0.74-0.83])(均为 p<0.0001)。老年患者和因 COVID-19 肺炎住院的患者也观察到了类似的结果。结论 这些证据借鉴了大流行时期随机对照试验的经验,为临床实践提供了参考。雷米地韦能显著降低住院患者(包括老年人和 COVID-19 肺炎患者)的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
HIV/AIDS and COVID-19: Shared Lessons from Two Pandemics. Predictors of persistent fever among patients with suspected infective endocarditis: think outside the box. Rewriting the Script. Change in Blood Pressure, Weight, and Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors After Switch From Protease Inhibitors to Dolutegravir: Post hoc Analysis of the 48-week Randomised Second-line Switch to Dolutegravir Trial. Choosing Wisely: Effectiveness and Safety of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Close Contacts of Invasive Group A Streptococci Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1