Hearing Loss, Incident Parkinson Disease, and Treatment With Hearing Aids

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY JAMA neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3568
Lee E. Neilson, Kelly M. Reavis, Jack Wiedrick, Gregory D. Scott
{"title":"Hearing Loss, Incident Parkinson Disease, and Treatment With Hearing Aids","authors":"Lee E. Neilson, Kelly M. Reavis, Jack Wiedrick, Gregory D. Scott","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceThe risk of developing Parkinson disease (PD) after objective hearing loss is unknown. PD studies using self-reported hearing loss are insensitive, and objective data are lacking.ObjectiveTo examine the association of hearing loss with incident PD in US veterans and its effect modification by well-established prodromal conditions and hearing aids.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study analyzed electronic health record data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs for veterans who had an audiogram from January 1, 1999, to December 30, 2022. Individuals with data missing or a preexisting PD diagnosis were excluded.ExposureAudiogram-confirmed hearing loss.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCumulative incidence of PD was calculated with adjustment for competing risk of death.ResultsAmong 7 296 051 veterans with an audiogram, 3 596 365 were included. They were mostly male (n = 3 452 898 [96%]) and had a mean (SD) age of 67 (10.3) years. A total of 750 010 individuals (20.8%) had normal hearing at the time of audiometry examination; among those with hearing loss, 1 080 651 (30.0%), 1 039 785 (28.9%), 568 296 (15.8%), and 157 623 (4.3%) individuals had mild (20-<35 dB), moderate (35-<50 dB), moderate to severe (50-<65 dB), and severe to profound (65-120 dB) hearing loss, respectively. Age, gender, and smoking history were balanced between all exposed and unexposed groups with further adjustment for race, ethnicity, and frailty. At 10 years after the baseline audiogram, the numbers of additional cases of PD were 6.1 (95% CI, 4.5-7.79, 15.8 (95% CI, 12.8-18.8), 16.2 (95% CI, 11.9-20.6), and 12.1 (95% CI, 4.5-19.6) among veterans with mild, moderate, moderate to severe, and severe to profound hearing loss, respectively, compared with those with normal hearing. When combined with established prodromal conditions, hearing loss was associated with 5.7 (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) additional cases of PD at 10 years compared with either condition alone. With prompt hearing aid dispensation, incident cases of PD decreased by 21.6 cases (95% CI, 19.5-23.6) at 10 years.Conclusions and RelevanceHearing loss appears to be an independent risk factor for later development of PD. Hearing aids attenuate this risk, and therefore widespread screening for hearing loss and appropriate use of hearing aids may reduce the incidence of PD. Additional studies are needed to examine the mechanisms underlying the association between hearing loss and PD.","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3568","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceThe risk of developing Parkinson disease (PD) after objective hearing loss is unknown. PD studies using self-reported hearing loss are insensitive, and objective data are lacking.ObjectiveTo examine the association of hearing loss with incident PD in US veterans and its effect modification by well-established prodromal conditions and hearing aids.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study analyzed electronic health record data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs for veterans who had an audiogram from January 1, 1999, to December 30, 2022. Individuals with data missing or a preexisting PD diagnosis were excluded.ExposureAudiogram-confirmed hearing loss.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCumulative incidence of PD was calculated with adjustment for competing risk of death.ResultsAmong 7 296 051 veterans with an audiogram, 3 596 365 were included. They were mostly male (n = 3 452 898 [96%]) and had a mean (SD) age of 67 (10.3) years. A total of 750 010 individuals (20.8%) had normal hearing at the time of audiometry examination; among those with hearing loss, 1 080 651 (30.0%), 1 039 785 (28.9%), 568 296 (15.8%), and 157 623 (4.3%) individuals had mild (20-<35 dB), moderate (35-<50 dB), moderate to severe (50-<65 dB), and severe to profound (65-120 dB) hearing loss, respectively. Age, gender, and smoking history were balanced between all exposed and unexposed groups with further adjustment for race, ethnicity, and frailty. At 10 years after the baseline audiogram, the numbers of additional cases of PD were 6.1 (95% CI, 4.5-7.79, 15.8 (95% CI, 12.8-18.8), 16.2 (95% CI, 11.9-20.6), and 12.1 (95% CI, 4.5-19.6) among veterans with mild, moderate, moderate to severe, and severe to profound hearing loss, respectively, compared with those with normal hearing. When combined with established prodromal conditions, hearing loss was associated with 5.7 (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) additional cases of PD at 10 years compared with either condition alone. With prompt hearing aid dispensation, incident cases of PD decreased by 21.6 cases (95% CI, 19.5-23.6) at 10 years.Conclusions and RelevanceHearing loss appears to be an independent risk factor for later development of PD. Hearing aids attenuate this risk, and therefore widespread screening for hearing loss and appropriate use of hearing aids may reduce the incidence of PD. Additional studies are needed to examine the mechanisms underlying the association between hearing loss and PD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力损失、帕金森病和助听器治疗
重要性客观听力损失后患帕金森病(PD)的风险尚不清楚。这项队列研究分析了美国退伍军人事务部提供的电子健康记录数据,这些数据来自 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 30 日期间进行过听力检查的退伍军人。结果在 7 296 051 名接受过听力检查的退伍军人中,有 3 596 365 人被纳入研究。他们大多为男性(n = 3 452 898 [96%]),平均(标清)年龄为 67 (10.3) 岁。共有 750 010 人(20.8%)在测听时听力正常;在有听力损失的人中,1 080 651 人(30.0%)、1 039 785 人(28.9%)、568 296 人(15.8%)和 157 623 人(4.3%)有轻度听力损失(20.0%)。3%)分别患有轻度(20-<35 dB)、中度(35-<50 dB)、中至重度(50-<65 dB)和重度至极重度(65-120 dB)听力损失。所有暴露组和未暴露组的年龄、性别和吸烟史均保持平衡,并根据种族、民族和体弱程度作了进一步调整。与听力正常的退伍军人相比,在基线听力图测定后的 10 年中,轻度、中度、中至重度和重度至极重度听力损失的退伍军人中,新增的前驱症状病例数分别为 6.1 例(95% CI,4.5-7.79)、15.8 例(95% CI,12.8-18.8)、16.2 例(95% CI,11.9-20.6)和 12.1 例(95% CI,4.5-19.6)。当听力损失与已确定的前驱症状相结合时,与单独存在听力损失或前驱症状相比,听力损失会在10年后导致5.7(95% CI,2.2-9.2)例额外的帕金森病病例。如果及时配戴助听器,10 年后发生老年痴呆症的病例将减少 21.6 例(95% CI,19.5-23.6)。助听器可降低这一风险,因此,广泛开展听力损失筛查和适当使用助听器可降低老年痴呆症的发病率。还需要进行更多的研究来探讨听力损失与帕金森氏症之间的关联机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Quality Improvement Intervention for Reducing Acute Treatment Times in Ischemic Stroke: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. Heatwaves and Neurodegenerative Disease. Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Mimicking a Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor. Discontinuation of First-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Stable Multiple Sclerosis Neurological Pupil Index and Intracranial Hypertension in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the ORANGE Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1