Greenness and whiteness appraisal for bioanalysis of quetiapine, levodopa and carbidopa in spiked human plasma by high performance thin layer chromatography

IF 4.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s13065-024-01309-w
Finan T. Hindam, Amal M. Abou Al Alamein, Reham M. Arafa, Neven Ahmed, Basma M. Eltanany
{"title":"Greenness and whiteness appraisal for bioanalysis of quetiapine, levodopa and carbidopa in spiked human plasma by high performance thin layer chromatography","authors":"Finan T. Hindam,&nbsp;Amal M. Abou Al Alamein,&nbsp;Reham M. Arafa,&nbsp;Neven Ahmed,&nbsp;Basma M. Eltanany","doi":"10.1186/s13065-024-01309-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A sustainable HPTLC-densitometric method was developed for quantitative determination of Quetiapine (QUET), Levodopa (LD) and Carbidopa (CD) in presence of Dopamine (DOP) as an internal standard. This applicable technique was achieved by spiking human plasma and extraction was performed using the protein precipitation approach. The mobile phase used was acetone, dichloromethane, n-butanol, glacial acetic acid and water (3: 2.5: 2: 2: 1.75, by volume). Method validation was done according to US-FDA guidelines and was able to quantify Quetiapine, Levodopa and Carbidopa in the ranges of 100–4000, 200–8000 and 30–1300 ng/mL, respectively. Bioanalytical method validation parameters were assessed for the studied drugs. Finally<b>,</b> the analytical suggested methodology was evaluated using various green and white analytical chemistry metrics and other tools, such as the green solvent selection tool, analytical eco-scale, green analytical procedure index, analytical greenness metric approach and the red–green–blue algorithm tool. The results revealed that the applied analytical method had a minor impact on the environment and is a relatively greener option than other previously reported chromatographic methods.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-024-01309-w","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-024-01309-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A sustainable HPTLC-densitometric method was developed for quantitative determination of Quetiapine (QUET), Levodopa (LD) and Carbidopa (CD) in presence of Dopamine (DOP) as an internal standard. This applicable technique was achieved by spiking human plasma and extraction was performed using the protein precipitation approach. The mobile phase used was acetone, dichloromethane, n-butanol, glacial acetic acid and water (3: 2.5: 2: 2: 1.75, by volume). Method validation was done according to US-FDA guidelines and was able to quantify Quetiapine, Levodopa and Carbidopa in the ranges of 100–4000, 200–8000 and 30–1300 ng/mL, respectively. Bioanalytical method validation parameters were assessed for the studied drugs. Finally, the analytical suggested methodology was evaluated using various green and white analytical chemistry metrics and other tools, such as the green solvent selection tool, analytical eco-scale, green analytical procedure index, analytical greenness metric approach and the red–green–blue algorithm tool. The results revealed that the applied analytical method had a minor impact on the environment and is a relatively greener option than other previously reported chromatographic methods.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用高效薄层色谱法对加标人血浆中的喹硫平、左旋多巴和卡比多巴进行生物分析的绿色度和白度评价
以多巴胺(DOP)为内标,建立了一种可持续的HPTLC-密度测定法,用于定量测定喹硫平(QUET)、左旋多巴(LD)和卡比多巴(CD)。这种适用的技术是通过添加人血浆并采用蛋白沉淀法进行提取实现的。使用的流动相为丙酮、二氯甲烷、正丁醇、冰醋酸和水(体积比为 3:2.5:2:2:1.75)。方法验证根据美国食品药物管理局指南进行,可分别在 100-4000、200-8000 和 30-1300 纳克/毫升范围内定量检测喹硫平、左旋多巴和卡比多巴。对所研究药物的生物分析方法验证参数进行了评估。最后,利用各种绿色和白色分析化学指标及其他工具,如绿色溶剂选择工具、分析生态尺度、绿色分析程序指数、分析绿色度量方法和红-绿-蓝算法工具,对建议的分析方法进行了评估。结果表明,所应用的分析方法对环境的影响较小,与之前报道的其他色谱法相比是一种相对更环保的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Olive mill wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCWs) Simultaneously quantifying a novel five-component anti- migraine formulation containing ergotamine, propyphenazone, caffeine, camylofin, and mecloxamine using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric models New chemometrics-assisted spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of co-formulated drugs montelukast, rupatadine, and desloratadine in their different dosage combinations AQbD-enhanced green RP-UPLC-PDA methodology for quantification and forced degradation studies for omeprazole, amoxicillin, and rifabutin Chromatographic assay of recently approved co-formulation of Vonoprazan fumarate with low dose Aspirin: AGREE, Complex MoGAPI, and RGB 12-model assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1