Predicting nanocarrier permeation across the human intestine in vitro: model matters†

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS Biomaterials Science Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1039/D4BM01092B
Nathalie Jung, Jonas Schreiner, Florentin Baur, Sarah Vogel-Kindgen and Maike Windbergs
{"title":"Predicting nanocarrier permeation across the human intestine in vitro: model matters†","authors":"Nathalie Jung, Jonas Schreiner, Florentin Baur, Sarah Vogel-Kindgen and Maike Windbergs","doi":"10.1039/D4BM01092B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >For clinical translation of oral nanocarriers, simulation of the intestinal microenvironment during <em>in vitro</em> testing is crucial to evaluate interactions with the intestinal mucosa. However, studies are often conducted using simplistic cell culture models, overlooking key physiological factors, and potentially leading to an overestimation of nanocarrier permeation. In this study, we systematically investigate different tissue models of the human intestine under static cultivation and dynamic flow conditions and analyze the impact of altered tissue characteristics on nanocarrier permeation. Our results reveal that the selection of cell types as well as the respective culture condition have a notable impact on the physiological characteristics of the resulting tissues. Tissue layer thickness, mucus secretion, and barrier impairment, all increase with increasing amounts of goblet cells and the application of dynamic flow conditions. Permeation studies with poly(lactic-<em>co</em>-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanocarriers with and without polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating elucidate that the amount of mucus present in the respective model is the limiting factor for the permeation of PLGA nanocarriers, while tissue topography presents the key factor influencing PEG–PLGA nanocarrier permeation. Furthermore, both nanocarriers exhibit diametrically opposite permeation kinetics compared to soluble compounds. In summary, these findings reveal the critical role of the implemented test systems on permeation assessment and emphasize that, in the context of preclinical nanocarrier testing, the choice of <em>in vitro</em> model matters.</p>","PeriodicalId":65,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials Science","volume":" 22","pages":" 5775-5788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/bm/d4bm01092b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/bm/d4bm01092b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For clinical translation of oral nanocarriers, simulation of the intestinal microenvironment during in vitro testing is crucial to evaluate interactions with the intestinal mucosa. However, studies are often conducted using simplistic cell culture models, overlooking key physiological factors, and potentially leading to an overestimation of nanocarrier permeation. In this study, we systematically investigate different tissue models of the human intestine under static cultivation and dynamic flow conditions and analyze the impact of altered tissue characteristics on nanocarrier permeation. Our results reveal that the selection of cell types as well as the respective culture condition have a notable impact on the physiological characteristics of the resulting tissues. Tissue layer thickness, mucus secretion, and barrier impairment, all increase with increasing amounts of goblet cells and the application of dynamic flow conditions. Permeation studies with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanocarriers with and without polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating elucidate that the amount of mucus present in the respective model is the limiting factor for the permeation of PLGA nanocarriers, while tissue topography presents the key factor influencing PEG–PLGA nanocarrier permeation. Furthermore, both nanocarriers exhibit diametrically opposite permeation kinetics compared to soluble compounds. In summary, these findings reveal the critical role of the implemented test systems on permeation assessment and emphasize that, in the context of preclinical nanocarrier testing, the choice of in vitro model matters.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测纳米载体在体外通过人体肠道的渗透性:模型很重要。
对于口服纳米载体的临床转化而言,体外测试期间的肠道微环境模拟对于评估与肠道粘膜的相互作用至关重要。然而,研究通常使用简单的细胞培养模型,忽略了关键的生理因素,可能导致高估纳米载体的渗透性。在本研究中,我们系统地研究了静态培养和动态流动条件下人体肠道的不同组织模型,并分析了组织特征改变对纳米载体渗透的影响。我们的研究结果表明,细胞类型的选择以及相应的培养条件对所形成组织的生理特性有显著影响。组织层厚度、粘液分泌和屏障损伤都会随着鹅口疮细胞数量的增加和动态流动条件的应用而增加。对带有和不带有聚乙二醇(PEG)涂层的聚(乳酸-共聚-乙醇酸)(PLGA)纳米载体的渗透研究表明,相应模型中存在的粘液量是 PLGA 纳米载体渗透的限制因素,而组织地形则是影响 PEG-PLGA 纳米载体渗透的关键因素。此外,与可溶性化合物相比,这两种纳米载体都表现出截然相反的渗透动力学。总之,这些发现揭示了所采用的测试系统对渗透评估的关键作用,并强调在临床前纳米载体测试中,体外模型的选择非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomaterials Science
Biomaterials Science MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
556
期刊介绍: Biomaterials Science is an international high impact journal exploring the science of biomaterials and their translation towards clinical use. Its scope encompasses new concepts in biomaterials design, studies into the interaction of biomaterials with the body, and the use of materials to answer fundamental biological questions.
期刊最新文献
Nanotechnology at the crossroads of stem cell medicine. Construction of strontium-loaded injectable lubricating hydrogel and its role in promoting repair of cartilage defects. Thermoresponsive degradable hydrogels with renewable surfaces for protein removal. Aliphatic polycarbonates with acid degradable ketal side groups as multi-pH-responsive immunodrug nanocarriers. Chiral recognition of amino acids through homochiral metallacycle [ZnCl2L]2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1