Clinical value of wideband acoustic immittance in the diagnosis of otitis media with effusion under negative intratympanic pressure in adults.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2414801
Ao Li, Xuan Yang, Yuqin Xu, Ning Zhao, Xueyao Liu, Haoliang Du, Jifeng Xu, Xia Gao, Ye Yang
{"title":"Clinical value of wideband acoustic immittance in the diagnosis of otitis media with effusion under negative intratympanic pressure in adults.","authors":"Ao Li, Xuan Yang, Yuqin Xu, Ning Zhao, Xueyao Liu, Haoliang Du, Jifeng Xu, Xia Gao, Ye Yang","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2414801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Normative clinical values for wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) are not well-established.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to define the normative contour plot characteristics of WAI and evaluate its diagnostic value in detecting tympanic effusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected from subjects with normal hearing (76 ears) and type C tympanograms on 226-Hz tympanometry (130 ears). Matlab was used to process and analyze the data. The maximum absorbance of WAI was used as the primary indicator, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine the optimal cut-off value. WAI contour plots were compared to 226-Hz tympanometry and otoendoscopy, the latter being the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean WAI plots in the normal group showed single peaks (absorbance, >70%) and a nearly symmetrical distribution of the peak area around the 0 daPa pressure line. The ROC curve indicated an AUC value of 0.910, with 78% as the optimal cut-off value of maximum absorbance for detecting effusion. WAI demonstrated better diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 82.26%, specificity: 86.76%, kappa: 0.691) than 226-Hz tympanometry (sensitivity: 61.29%, specificity: 61.76%, kappa: 0.230).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Normative WAI values were established, and WAI proved more accurate than 226-Hz tympanometry for identifying tympanic effusion, offering valuable guidance for selecting treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2414801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Normative clinical values for wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) are not well-established.

Aims: This study aims to define the normative contour plot characteristics of WAI and evaluate its diagnostic value in detecting tympanic effusion.

Materials and methods: Data were collected from subjects with normal hearing (76 ears) and type C tympanograms on 226-Hz tympanometry (130 ears). Matlab was used to process and analyze the data. The maximum absorbance of WAI was used as the primary indicator, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine the optimal cut-off value. WAI contour plots were compared to 226-Hz tympanometry and otoendoscopy, the latter being the gold standard.

Results: Mean WAI plots in the normal group showed single peaks (absorbance, >70%) and a nearly symmetrical distribution of the peak area around the 0 daPa pressure line. The ROC curve indicated an AUC value of 0.910, with 78% as the optimal cut-off value of maximum absorbance for detecting effusion. WAI demonstrated better diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 82.26%, specificity: 86.76%, kappa: 0.691) than 226-Hz tympanometry (sensitivity: 61.29%, specificity: 61.76%, kappa: 0.230).

Conclusions and significance: Normative WAI values were established, and WAI proved more accurate than 226-Hz tympanometry for identifying tympanic effusion, offering valuable guidance for selecting treatment options.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宽带声沉在诊断成人鼓室负压下伴有流脓的中耳炎中的临床价值。
背景:目的:本研究旨在确定 WAI 的标准等高线图特征,并评估其在检测鼓室积液方面的诊断价值:数据收集自听力正常者(76 耳)和通过 226Hz 鼓室测量法获得 C 型鼓室图的受试者(130 耳)。使用 Matlab 处理和分析数据。以 WAI 的最大吸光度为主要指标,绘制接收器操作特征曲线 (ROC) 以确定最佳临界值。将 WAI 等高线图与 226Hz 鼓室测压法和耳内镜检查(后者是金标准)进行比较:正常组的 WAI 等高线图显示出单峰(吸光度大于 70%),峰面积在 0 daPa 压力线附近几乎对称分布。ROC 曲线显示 AUC 值为 0.910,最大吸光度的 78% 是检测渗出的最佳临界值。WAI 的诊断性能(灵敏度:82.26%,特异性:86.76%,kappa:0.691)优于 226Hz 鼓室测压法(灵敏度:61.29%,特异性:61.76%,kappa:0.230):在确定鼓室积液方面,WAI 被证明比 226Hz 鼓室测量法更准确,为选择治疗方案提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease. Impact of fast-track on recurrence and malignant transformation of patients with inverted papilloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1