Racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes: A systematic review

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991
Polina Zmijewski , Chibueze Nwaiwu , Hayato Nakanishi , Soroush Farsi , Jessica Fazendin , Brenessa Lindeman , Herbert Chen , Andrea Gillis
{"title":"Racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes: A systematic review","authors":"Polina Zmijewski ,&nbsp;Chibueze Nwaiwu ,&nbsp;Hayato Nakanishi ,&nbsp;Soroush Farsi ,&nbsp;Jessica Fazendin ,&nbsp;Brenessa Lindeman ,&nbsp;Herbert Chen ,&nbsp;Andrea Gillis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults &gt;18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 ​% White patients, 22 ​% Black patients, 7 ​% Hispanic patients, and 3 ​% Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 ​% (n ​= ​13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​21, p ​= ​0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 ​%, n ​= ​30, p ​&lt; ​0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 ​%, n ​= ​8, p ​= ​0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 ​%, n ​= ​34), Black (12.4 ​%, n ​= ​13, p ​= ​0.065), Hispanic (16.0 ​%, n ​= ​15, p ​= ​0.301), and Asian (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​9, p ​= ​0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 ​% (n ​= ​54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 ​%, n ​= ​7, p ​= ​0.595), Hispanic (10.5 ​%, n ​= ​2, p ​= ​1.000), and Asian (11.1 ​%, n ​= ​3, p ​= ​1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 115991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults >18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).

Results

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 ​% White patients, 22 ​% Black patients, 7 ​% Hispanic patients, and 3 ​% Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 ​% (n ​= ​13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​21, p ​= ​0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 ​%, n ​= ​30, p ​< ​0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 ​%, n ​= ​8, p ​= ​0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 ​%, n ​= ​34), Black (12.4 ​%, n ​= ​13, p ​= ​0.065), Hispanic (16.0 ​%, n ​= ​15, p ​= ​0.301), and Asian (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​9, p ​= ​0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 ​% (n ​= ​54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 ​%, n ​= ​7, p ​= ​0.595), Hispanic (10.5 ​%, n ​= ​2, p ​= ​1.000), and Asian (11.1 ​%, n ​= ​3, p ​= ​1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.

Conclusions

Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺癌结果中的种族差异:系统综述。
导言:手术治疗结果中的种族差异已被充分描述,但研究甲状腺癌治疗结果趋势的文献却很少。我们对甲状腺癌治疗效果的研究进行了系统回顾,以更好地界定种族的影响:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在多个学术数据库中对有关甲状腺癌和手术结果的文章进行了全面检索。共审阅了 1771 篇摘要。摘要由两名独立审稿人筛选,有异议的由第三名审稿人解决。纳入的研究均以美国为基地,包含单个中心的独特数据,重点关注分化型甲状腺癌的治疗效果,研究对象为年龄大于 18 岁的成年人,并在研究结果中报告了种族情况。对汇总的数据进行了带耶茨校正的卡方统计。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42022300021)上注册:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准,涉及 7221 名患者的数据。在纳入的研究中,我们的研究包括67%的白人患者、22%的黑人患者、7%的西班牙裔患者和3%的亚洲患者。在白人患者中,8.4%(n = 13)观察到甲状腺外扩展。与白人患者相比,黑人患者(18.4%,n = 21,p = 0.024)和西班牙裔患者(28.3%,n = 30,p 结论:甲状旁腺外扩是一种常见的甲状腺疾病:在甲状腺癌的研究结果中,很少有关于种族的报告。根据我们的分析,我们得出结论:非白人患者在发病时罹患晚期局部疾病的风险可能更高。要想更好地了解甲状腺癌结果中的种族差异以及如何缓解这些差异,就需要更多有关种族的详细数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Beyond total PCI thresholds: Limitations of the surgical peritoneal cancer index in decision-making for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy Non-compressible torso hemorrhage control with intravascular ultrasound guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion A multicenter study of trauma center undertriage: Do racial disparities exist and do they impact outcomes? Altered vasomotor function and endothelial impairment in a neuroendocrine tumor mouse model Mastectomy pain blocks: A comparison of preoperative versus intraoperative pectoralis nerve blocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1