Mid-Term Results of Popliteal-Pedal Inframalleolar Vein Bypasses in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients After Previous Failed Tibial Endovascular Recanalization

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.006
Nicola Troisi , Francesco Stilo , Daniele Adami , Giovanni De Caridi , Nunzio Montelione , Giulia Bertagna , Chiara Barillà , Raffaella Berchiolli , Francesco Spinelli , Filippo Benedetto
{"title":"Mid-Term Results of Popliteal-Pedal Inframalleolar Vein Bypasses in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients After Previous Failed Tibial Endovascular Recanalization","authors":"Nicola Troisi ,&nbsp;Francesco Stilo ,&nbsp;Daniele Adami ,&nbsp;Giovanni De Caridi ,&nbsp;Nunzio Montelione ,&nbsp;Giulia Bertagna ,&nbsp;Chiara Barillà ,&nbsp;Raffaella Berchiolli ,&nbsp;Francesco Spinelli ,&nbsp;Filippo Benedetto","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inframalleolar bypass still preserves its role in the modern endovascular era. Aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of “short” inframalleolar vein bypasses in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after the previously failed tibial endovascular recanalization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2015 and December 2021,107 CLTI patients in 3 Italian Departments of Vascular Surgery underwent “short” inframalleolar vein bypass after failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Early (30-day) and 3-year outcomes were evaluated in terms of survival, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival. Univariate analysis of the perioperative factors affecting outcomes were performed by the means of log-rank test. The associations of procedure variables were sought based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Distal anastomosis (inframalleolar) was mostly performed on dorsal pedis (64, 59.8%). At 30 days, bypass occlusion was recorded in 5 cases (4.6%). The mean follow-up period was 20.5 ± 17.9 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 66.7%. Three-year estimates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival were 68.5%, 70.1%, 70.2%, and 76.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a negative association of insulin treatment with primary patency (HR 4.3, <em>P</em> = 0.04), primary assisted patency (HR 5.1, <em>P</em> = 0.02), and secondary patency (HR 5.1, <em>P</em> = 0.02). The negative association of long-term corticosteroid use was also found with primary patency (HR 7.8, <em>P</em> = 0.005), primary assisted patency (HR 8.7, <em>P</em> = 0.003), secondary patency (HR 8.7, <em>P</em> = 0.003), and amputation-free survival (HR 3.9, <em>P</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Short” vein bypasses to the foot arteries in CLTI patients yielded good mid-term overall patency and limb salvage rates after a failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and long-term corticosteroid use seemed to affect the outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 460-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Inframalleolar bypass still preserves its role in the modern endovascular era. Aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of “short” inframalleolar vein bypasses in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after the previously failed tibial endovascular recanalization.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2021,107 CLTI patients in 3 Italian Departments of Vascular Surgery underwent “short” inframalleolar vein bypass after failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Early (30-day) and 3-year outcomes were evaluated in terms of survival, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival. Univariate analysis of the perioperative factors affecting outcomes were performed by the means of log-rank test. The associations of procedure variables were sought based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

Distal anastomosis (inframalleolar) was mostly performed on dorsal pedis (64, 59.8%). At 30 days, bypass occlusion was recorded in 5 cases (4.6%). The mean follow-up period was 20.5 ± 17.9 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 66.7%. Three-year estimates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival were 68.5%, 70.1%, 70.2%, and 76.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a negative association of insulin treatment with primary patency (HR 4.3, P = 0.04), primary assisted patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02), and secondary patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02). The negative association of long-term corticosteroid use was also found with primary patency (HR 7.8, P = 0.005), primary assisted patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), secondary patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), and amputation-free survival (HR 3.9, P = 0.05).

Conclusions

Short” vein bypasses to the foot arteries in CLTI patients yielded good mid-term overall patency and limb salvage rates after a failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and long-term corticosteroid use seemed to affect the outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曾接受胫骨血管内再通术失败的 CLTI 患者接受腘腓肠肌下静脉搭桥术的中期效果。
目的:在现代血管内手术时代,髂内静脉搭桥术仍然发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估胫骨血管内再通失败后的慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者接受 "短 "髂内静脉搭桥术的中期疗效:2015年1月至2021年12月期间,意大利3个血管外科部门的107名CLTI患者在胫骨血管内再通术失败后接受了 "短 "踝下静脉搭桥术。对患者早期(30 天)和 3 年的生存率、主要通畅率、主要辅助通畅率、次要通畅率和无截肢生存率进行了评估。通过对数秩检验对影响疗效的围手术期因素进行了单变量分析。根据多变量 Cox 回归分析寻找手术变量之间的关联:远端吻合术(脐下)大多在足背进行(64例,59.8%)。30天后,5例患者(4.6%)出现旁路闭塞。平均随访时间为 20.5 ± 17.9 个月。估计三年总存活率为 66.7%。主要通畅率、主要辅助通畅率、次要通畅率和无截肢存活率的三年估计值分别为 68.5%、70.1%、70.2% 和 76.7%。多变量分析显示,胰岛素治疗与一次通畅率(HR 4.3,P = .04)、一次辅助通畅率(HR 5.1,P = .02)和二次通畅率(HR 5.1,P = .02)呈负相关。长期使用皮质类固醇还与一次通畅率(HR 7.8,p = .005)、一次辅助通畅率(HR 8.7,p = .003)、二次通畅率(HR 8.7,p = .003)和无截肢生存率(HR 3.9,p = .05)呈负相关:结论:CLTI 患者足部动脉的 "短 "静脉搭桥术可获得良好的中期总体通畅率,以及胫骨血管内再通失败后的肢体挽救率。胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和长期使用皮质类固醇似乎会影响治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Retrograde access bailout versus bypass surgery for failed antegrade infra-inguinal angioplasty. A real-world pharmacovigilance study of Cilostazol based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System:A Cross-Sectional Disproportionality Analysis. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After EVAR and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Blunt traumatic ruptures of the aortic isthmus: favor associated lesions rather than rupture in hemodynamically unstable patients. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of CHIVA and Conventional Stripping and Ablation Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1