Development of a new radical cystectomy surveillance protocol and nurse-led cystectomy follow-up clinic in Australia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/ans.19272
Ashley Lee, Katherine Ong, Mohammed Al-Zubaidi, Tracey Goodall, Cynthia Hawks, Steve P McCombie, Dickon Hayne
{"title":"Development of a new radical cystectomy surveillance protocol and nurse-led cystectomy follow-up clinic in Australia.","authors":"Ashley Lee, Katherine Ong, Mohammed Al-Zubaidi, Tracey Goodall, Cynthia Hawks, Steve P McCombie, Dickon Hayne","doi":"10.1111/ans.19272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study determined, implemented, and assessed a nurse-led radical cystectomy follow-up protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2021, an evidence-based risk-stratified protocol (non-urological cancers and benign [N-UC&B], low, or high risk) was developed from current guidelines, local and national expert opinion, and after formal discussion with the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Western Australia (WA) and Australia and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group. Retrospective and prospective assessment of cystectomy follow-up occurred between 2015 and 2023. Patients received 'surgeon-led' follow-up March 2015 to August 2021, and 'nurse-led' follow-up August 2021 to April 2023. Adherence to follow-up, cost-analysis, and healthcare efficiency calculations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 176 cystectomy patients, 159 (90.3%) were eligible for inclusion. Overall adherence to nurse-led follow-up was 78.6% compared to 43.4% in surgeon-led (P < 0.001). Adherence to nurse-led follow-up was higher in all risk categories (high-risk 79.1% vs. 43%, P < 0.001; low risk 75% vs. 52.3%, P = 0.110; N-UC&B 71% vs. 30%, P = 0.153). Nurse-led consultation saved $59.50 per consultation with overall cost savings of $179.50, $416.50, and $595 for the entire follow-up period for N-UC&B, low, and high-risk groups based on consultation alone. A total of 1072 appointments (536 h, $62 390.40) would have been saved if the surgeon-led cohort of patients were seen in nurse-led clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Protocol driven nurse-led cystectomy follow-up demonstrates excellent adherence and may be more cost-effective than surgeon-led follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study determined, implemented, and assessed a nurse-led radical cystectomy follow-up protocol.

Methods: In 2021, an evidence-based risk-stratified protocol (non-urological cancers and benign [N-UC&B], low, or high risk) was developed from current guidelines, local and national expert opinion, and after formal discussion with the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Western Australia (WA) and Australia and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group. Retrospective and prospective assessment of cystectomy follow-up occurred between 2015 and 2023. Patients received 'surgeon-led' follow-up March 2015 to August 2021, and 'nurse-led' follow-up August 2021 to April 2023. Adherence to follow-up, cost-analysis, and healthcare efficiency calculations were performed.

Results: Of 176 cystectomy patients, 159 (90.3%) were eligible for inclusion. Overall adherence to nurse-led follow-up was 78.6% compared to 43.4% in surgeon-led (P < 0.001). Adherence to nurse-led follow-up was higher in all risk categories (high-risk 79.1% vs. 43%, P < 0.001; low risk 75% vs. 52.3%, P = 0.110; N-UC&B 71% vs. 30%, P = 0.153). Nurse-led consultation saved $59.50 per consultation with overall cost savings of $179.50, $416.50, and $595 for the entire follow-up period for N-UC&B, low, and high-risk groups based on consultation alone. A total of 1072 appointments (536 h, $62 390.40) would have been saved if the surgeon-led cohort of patients were seen in nurse-led clinics.

Conclusion: Protocol driven nurse-led cystectomy follow-up demonstrates excellent adherence and may be more cost-effective than surgeon-led follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在澳大利亚制定新的根治性膀胱切除术监控方案和护士主导的膀胱切除术随访诊所。
背景: 本研究确定、实施并评估了护士主导的根治性膀胱切除术随访方案:本研究确定、实施并评估了由护士主导的根治性膀胱切除术随访方案:2021年,在与澳大利亚和新西兰泌尿外科学会(USANZ)西澳大利亚(WA)以及澳大利亚和新西兰泌尿生殖系统和前列腺(ANZUP)癌症试验小组正式讨论后,根据现行指南、当地和全国专家意见制定了循证风险分级方案(非泌尿系统癌症和良性[N-UC&B]、低风险或高风险)。膀胱切除术随访的回顾性和前瞻性评估发生在2015年至2023年之间。患者在2015年3月至2021年8月期间接受 "外科医生主导 "的随访,在2021年8月至2023年4月期间接受 "护士主导 "的随访。对随访的依从性、成本分析和医疗效率进行了计算:在176例膀胱切除术患者中,159例(90.3%)符合纳入条件。护士主导随访的总体坚持率为 78.6%,而外科医生主导随访的坚持率为 43.4%(P 结论:护士主导随访的总体坚持率为 78.6%,而外科医生主导随访的坚持率为 43.4%):与外科医生主导的随访相比,护士主导的膀胱切除术随访具有极高的依从性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Breaking barriers: addressing occupational hazards for female surgeons to achieve equitable healthcare Cutting the excess: tackling unnecessary orthopaedic surgeries Meconium peritonitis with lanugo due to antenatal colon perforation. Breast cancer related lymphoedema: a review of contemporary preventive strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1