{"title":"Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation.","authors":"Kevin Duff, Nora Grace Turok, Irene Piryatinsky","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and preliminarily validate recognition subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>49 older adults with no cognitive impairment were compared to 53 individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder (e.g., dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and traumatic brain injury) and 22 individuals with a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression and anxiety) on three recognition subtests (list, story, and figure) for Form B of the RBANS in this observational study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder performed significantly poorer on most of the recognition scores compared to those with no cognitive impairment and those with a primary psychiatric disorder, with these latter two groups being largely comparable. In the entire sample, for the recognition subtests, education only correlated with figure recognition scores, and neither age nor gender influenced recognition scores. The RBANS indexes correlated with most of the recognition scores in the expected directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group differences in performance on these recognition subtests preliminarily validate these scores on Form B, which were not previously available. Furthermore, these scores tended to not be influenced by age, education, or gender, although they were related to overall cognitive functioning. Additional validation is needed in larger, better clinically-defined, and more diverse samples. Nonetheless, these findings support the inclusion of the newly-developed Form B recognition subtests in future clinical practice and research settings to enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Develop and preliminarily validate recognition subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Method: 49 older adults with no cognitive impairment were compared to 53 individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder (e.g., dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and traumatic brain injury) and 22 individuals with a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression and anxiety) on three recognition subtests (list, story, and figure) for Form B of the RBANS in this observational study.
Results: The individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder performed significantly poorer on most of the recognition scores compared to those with no cognitive impairment and those with a primary psychiatric disorder, with these latter two groups being largely comparable. In the entire sample, for the recognition subtests, education only correlated with figure recognition scores, and neither age nor gender influenced recognition scores. The RBANS indexes correlated with most of the recognition scores in the expected directions.
Conclusions: The group differences in performance on these recognition subtests preliminarily validate these scores on Form B, which were not previously available. Furthermore, these scores tended to not be influenced by age, education, or gender, although they were related to overall cognitive functioning. Additional validation is needed in larger, better clinically-defined, and more diverse samples. Nonetheless, these findings support the inclusion of the newly-developed Form B recognition subtests in future clinical practice and research settings to enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment recommendations.
目的:开发并初步验证神经心理状态评估可重复电池表 B 的识别子测试:开发并初步验证神经心理状态评估可重复电池(RBANS)表格 B 的识别子测试:在这项观察研究中,49 名无认知障碍的老年人与 53 名患有原发性神经认知障碍(如痴呆、轻度认知障碍和脑外伤)的人和 22 名患有原发性精神障碍(如抑郁和焦虑)的人在 RBANS 表格 B 的三个识别分测验(列表、故事和图形)上进行了比较:与没有认知障碍的人和有原发性精神障碍的人相比,有原发性神经认知障碍的人在大多数辨认分上的表现明显较差,而后两组人的表现基本相当。在整个样本中,就识别分测验而言,教育程度只与图形识别得分相关,年龄和性别都不会影响识别得分。RBANS指数与大多数识别得分的相关性都在预期的方向上:在这些识别分测验中表现出的群体差异初步验证了表格 B 中的这些分数,而这些分数是以前所没有的。此外,这些分数往往不受年龄、教育程度或性别的影响,尽管它们与整体认知功能有关。还需要在规模更大、临床定义更明确和更多样化的样本中进行进一步验证。尽管如此,这些研究结果支持将新开发的表格 B 识别子测试纳入未来的临床实践和研究环境中,以提高诊断和治疗建议的准确性。