Comparative Scoping Review: Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Versus High-Income Nations.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.014
Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Suresh Annpatriciacatherine, Abrahamalex Jithu, Jones Jeromedanypraveenraj, Thangavelu Senthilvelkumar, Thomas Anand Augustine, Prashanth H Chalageri, Jacob George, Raji Thomas
{"title":"Comparative Scoping Review: Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Versus High-Income Nations.","authors":"Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Suresh Annpatriciacatherine, Abrahamalex Jithu, Jones Jeromedanypraveenraj, Thangavelu Senthilvelkumar, Thomas Anand Augustine, Prashanth H Chalageri, Jacob George, Raji Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine robotic interventions for upper limb rehabilitation poststroke, focusing on geographic distribution, stroke chronicity, outcome measures, outcomes of robotic interventions, and publication trends in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with high-income countries (HICs).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched for studies on upper extremity rehabilitation with robotics poststroke.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>This review focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2012 and 2024 that examined rehabilitation robots for upper limb impairments caused by stroke. The studies included adults aged ≥18 years in the acute, subacute, or chronic recovery phases. Eligible trials involved using robotic devices, independently or combined with other interventions. Only RCTs with 2 or more arms were considered, and all included studies were published in English.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, stroke chronicity, outcome measures, outcomes of robotic interventions, and temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Of 129 articles meeting the criteria, 107 were from HICs, and 22 were from LMICs. Major contributors from HICs included Italy, Taiwan, and the USA, whereas China was a significant contributor among LMICs. Most studies focused on patients with chronic stroke, with varying assessment tools, the most common being the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Evaluation. Positive outcomes were reported across studies, and recent research activity has increased in both settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the expanding research on robotic therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke, primarily from HICs with limited input from low- and middle-income nations. Although positive outcomes were frequently observed, disparities between high-income and low-and middle-income countries were clear. The growing research indicates rising interest and advancements in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine robotic interventions for upper limb rehabilitation poststroke, focusing on geographic distribution, stroke chronicity, outcome measures, outcomes of robotic interventions, and publication trends in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with high-income countries (HICs).

Data sources: Using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched for studies on upper extremity rehabilitation with robotics poststroke.

Study selection: This review focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2012 and 2024 that examined rehabilitation robots for upper limb impairments caused by stroke. The studies included adults aged ≥18 years in the acute, subacute, or chronic recovery phases. Eligible trials involved using robotic devices, independently or combined with other interventions. Only RCTs with 2 or more arms were considered, and all included studies were published in English.

Data extraction: Reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, stroke chronicity, outcome measures, outcomes of robotic interventions, and temporal trends.

Data synthesis: Of 129 articles meeting the criteria, 107 were from HICs, and 22 were from LMICs. Major contributors from HICs included Italy, Taiwan, and the USA, whereas China was a significant contributor among LMICs. Most studies focused on patients with chronic stroke, with varying assessment tools, the most common being the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Evaluation. Positive outcomes were reported across studies, and recent research activity has increased in both settings.

Conclusions: This review underscores the expanding research on robotic therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke, primarily from HICs with limited input from low- and middle-income nations. Although positive outcomes were frequently observed, disparities between high-income and low-and middle-income countries were clear. The growing research indicates rising interest and advancements in this domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较范围审查:中低收入国家与高收入国家的机器人辅助上肢中风康复。
目的研究中风后上肢康复的机器人干预,重点关注中低收入国家(LMICs)与高收入国家(HICs)相比的地理分布、中风慢性程度、结果测量、机器人干预的结果以及出版趋势:采用JBI方法和PRISMA-ScR指南,在PubMed、CENTRAL、Embase、CINAHL和PEDro数据库中搜索有关中风后使用机器人进行上肢康复的研究:本综述侧重于 2012 年至 2024 年间发表的随机对照试验 (RCT),这些试验研究了康复机器人治疗中风导致的上肢损伤。研究对象包括处于急性、亚急性或慢性康复阶段的 18 岁及以上成年人。符合条件的试验涉及独立使用或与其他干预措施相结合使用机器人设备。所有纳入的研究均以英语发表:审稿人独立提取了有关研究特征、中风慢性化程度、结果测量、机器人干预结果和时间趋势的数据:在符合标准的 129 篇文章中,107 篇来自高收入国家,22 篇来自低收入国家。高收入国家的主要贡献者包括意大利、台湾和美国,而中国是低收入国家的主要贡献者。大多数研究侧重于慢性中风患者,评估工具各不相同,最常见的是 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估。所有研究都报告了积极的结果,最近在这两种情况下的研究活动都有所增加:本综述强调了有关中风患者上肢康复机器人疗法的研究正在不断扩大,这些研究主要来自高收入国家,中低收入国家的研究成果有限。虽然经常观察到积极的结果,但高收入国家与中低收入国家之间的差距显而易见。越来越多的研究表明,人们对这一领域的兴趣日益浓厚,研究也在不断进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Should You Tell Others That You Live With Brain Injury? Things to Consider About Brain Injury and Disclosure. Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Following Stroke in the United States: A Scoping Review. Face recognition-driven video game for dysphagia rehabilitation in stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Letter to the Editor on: "Does a resistance training program affect between-arms volume difference and shoulder-arm disabilities in female breast cancer survivors? The role of surgery type and treatments." Response to Letter to Editor on "Does a Resistance Training Program Affect Between-arms Volume Difference and Shoulder Arm Disabilities in Female Breast Cancer Survivors? The Role of Surgery Type and Treatments. Secondary Outcomes of the EFICAN Trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1