{"title":"In vivo pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and brain concentration comparison of fentanyl and para-fluorofentanyl in rats.","authors":"Jeremy R Canfield, Jon E Sprague","doi":"10.1007/s00204-024-03887-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2022, para-fluorofentanyl (pFF) rose to the 6th most reported drug and the most reported fentanyl analog in the United States according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). pFF differs from fentanyl by the addition of a single fluorine group. To date, pFF has not been extensively evaluated in vivo and is frequently seen in combination with fentanyl. In the present study, the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and brain region-specific concentrations of pFF were evaluated in male Sprague-Dawley rats and compared to fentanyl. A 300 μg/kg subcutaneous dose of fentanyl or pFF was administered to assess PD and PK parameters as well as brain region concentrations. PD parameters were evaluated via a tail flick test to evaluate analgesia and core body temperature to measure hypothermia, a surrogate marker of overall opioid toxicity. Fentanyl and pFF were found to be equally active at the tested dose in terms of tail flick response with both compounds producing an analgesic response that lasted up to 240 min post-drug treatment. pFF induced a significantly greater hypothermic effect compared to fentanyl with a maximum temperature decrease of -5.6 ℃. Plasma PK parameters (T<sub>1/2</sub>, AUC, etc.) did not differ between fentanyl and pFF. However, pFF concentrations in the medulla, hippocampus, frontal cortex and striatum were more than two times the fentanyl concentrations. The increase in brain concentrations and greater hypothermic effect suggests that pFF is potentially more dangerous than fentanyl.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03887-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2022, para-fluorofentanyl (pFF) rose to the 6th most reported drug and the most reported fentanyl analog in the United States according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). pFF differs from fentanyl by the addition of a single fluorine group. To date, pFF has not been extensively evaluated in vivo and is frequently seen in combination with fentanyl. In the present study, the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and brain region-specific concentrations of pFF were evaluated in male Sprague-Dawley rats and compared to fentanyl. A 300 μg/kg subcutaneous dose of fentanyl or pFF was administered to assess PD and PK parameters as well as brain region concentrations. PD parameters were evaluated via a tail flick test to evaluate analgesia and core body temperature to measure hypothermia, a surrogate marker of overall opioid toxicity. Fentanyl and pFF were found to be equally active at the tested dose in terms of tail flick response with both compounds producing an analgesic response that lasted up to 240 min post-drug treatment. pFF induced a significantly greater hypothermic effect compared to fentanyl with a maximum temperature decrease of -5.6 ℃. Plasma PK parameters (T1/2, AUC, etc.) did not differ between fentanyl and pFF. However, pFF concentrations in the medulla, hippocampus, frontal cortex and striatum were more than two times the fentanyl concentrations. The increase in brain concentrations and greater hypothermic effect suggests that pFF is potentially more dangerous than fentanyl.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.