Effects of housing density on anxiety-like behavior of zebrafish in the plus maze with ramp

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Processes Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105114
Rodrigo Pessoa , Carla Motta , Elen Araujo-Pessoa , Amauri Gouveia
{"title":"Effects of housing density on anxiety-like behavior of zebrafish in the plus maze with ramp","authors":"Rodrigo Pessoa ,&nbsp;Carla Motta ,&nbsp;Elen Araujo-Pessoa ,&nbsp;Amauri Gouveia","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Population density in experimental animals is a crucial factor in maintaining the wellbeing of the organisms. Inadequate housing conditions can compromise the validity and reliability of research results, making comparisons between studies difficult. In sociable species such as zebrafish (Danio rerio), which are housed in groups, overcrowding or undercrowding represents a variable that needs to be considered. In this study, we evaluated the effects of housing at different densities for different exposure times on the anxiety response measured in the Plus Maze with Ramp test in zebrafish. The subjects (144) were divided into three large groups according to the housing time (1, 7, and 30 days). Each group was divided into six subgroups based on the density of the fish (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 fish/liter, n = 8) and housed in a 4-liter aquarium. After the housing conditions, each animal was tested individually in the PMR. Time and housing density altered the exploratory behavior of zebrafish. Increased housing time reduced the time spent in the ramp arms, with groups kept for 30 days spending less time in this compartment. Density increased the time spent in the flat arms in groups with 2 and 6 fish/liter and, conversely, reduced the exploration of the ramp arms. Isolation, on the other hand, increased the exploration of the ramp arms, indicating an anxiolytic effect. In this study, we demonstrate that housing conditions can act as low-intensity chronic stressors that alter anxiety-like behavior in zebrafish when tested in the PMR protocol.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population density in experimental animals is a crucial factor in maintaining the wellbeing of the organisms. Inadequate housing conditions can compromise the validity and reliability of research results, making comparisons between studies difficult. In sociable species such as zebrafish (Danio rerio), which are housed in groups, overcrowding or undercrowding represents a variable that needs to be considered. In this study, we evaluated the effects of housing at different densities for different exposure times on the anxiety response measured in the Plus Maze with Ramp test in zebrafish. The subjects (144) were divided into three large groups according to the housing time (1, 7, and 30 days). Each group was divided into six subgroups based on the density of the fish (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 fish/liter, n = 8) and housed in a 4-liter aquarium. After the housing conditions, each animal was tested individually in the PMR. Time and housing density altered the exploratory behavior of zebrafish. Increased housing time reduced the time spent in the ramp arms, with groups kept for 30 days spending less time in this compartment. Density increased the time spent in the flat arms in groups with 2 and 6 fish/liter and, conversely, reduced the exploration of the ramp arms. Isolation, on the other hand, increased the exploration of the ramp arms, indicating an anxiolytic effect. In this study, we demonstrate that housing conditions can act as low-intensity chronic stressors that alter anxiety-like behavior in zebrafish when tested in the PMR protocol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲养密度对斑马鱼在斜坡加迷宫中焦虑行为的影响
实验动物的种群密度是维持生物健康的关键因素。不适当的饲养条件会影响研究结果的有效性和可靠性,使研究之间难以进行比较。在斑马鱼(Danio rerio)等群居物种中,过度拥挤或拥挤不足是一个需要考虑的变量。在本研究中,我们评估了在不同暴露时间内不同密度的饲养对斑马鱼在斜坡加迷宫试验中焦虑反应的影响。研究对象(144 条)按饲养时间(1 天、7 天和 30 天)分为三个大组。每组根据鱼的密度(0.25、0.5、1、2、4、6 条/升,n = 8)分为六个亚组,饲养在一个 4 升的水族箱中。设定饲养条件后,在 PMR 中对每只动物进行单独测试。时间和饲养密度改变了斑马鱼的探索行为。饲养时间的增加减少了斑马鱼在斜臂中的停留时间,饲养 30 天的斑马鱼在斜臂中的停留时间更少。在每升饲养 2 条和 6 条斑马鱼的饲养组中,饲养密度增加了斑马鱼在扁平臂中的停留时间,反之,则减少了斑马鱼在斜坡臂中的探索时间。而隔离则增加了在斜坡臂的探索时间,这表明隔离具有抗焦虑作用。在这项研究中,我们证明了饲养条件可以作为低强度的慢性应激源,在 PMR 方案测试中改变斑马鱼的焦虑行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze. Behavioural response of female Lewis rats toward 31-kHz ultrasonic calls Sex-based differences, diurnal and seasonal trends in thermoregulatory behaviour of nesting Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) Comparative analysis of tracking and behavioral patterns between wild-type and genetically modified fruit flies using computer vision and statistical methods Abbreviated fixed-interval interventions promote self-control in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1