Multiple Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Runs and Futility. What Are the Limits?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002325
Justus G Reitz, Areen Almarkhan, Rittal Mehta, Arif Selcuk, Dana Harrar, Manan Desai, Guillermo Herrera, In Hye Park, Aybala Tongut, Yves d'Udekem, Sarah Schlatterer
{"title":"Multiple Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Runs and Futility. What Are the Limits?","authors":"Justus G Reitz, Areen Almarkhan, Rittal Mehta, Arif Selcuk, Dana Harrar, Manan Desai, Guillermo Herrera, In Hye Park, Aybala Tongut, Yves d'Udekem, Sarah Schlatterer","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite high mortality rates, pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) redeployments are frequently discussed in everyday clinical care. We aim to investigate predictors of mortality in those patients. Clinical data from a single pediatric center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with multiple ECMO runs between 2010 and 2023 were included. A total of 70 (13%) patients required multiple ECMO runs. Of those, 56 (80%) died before discharge; late mortality was 89% at a median of 1.6 (1.0-3.9) years. A total of 47 (67%) patients had neurologic findings. Only one (1%) survivor had a normal neurodevelopmental follow-up. Duration of the first ECMO run (odds ratio [OR]: 2.63, 1.08-7.96), total duration on ECMO (OR: 4.72, 1.29-23.54), neurologic findings at any time (OR: 7.94, 1.46-43.24), need for renal replacement therapy (OR: 4.79, 1.06-25.58), and lactate values correlated with late mortality. All 19 (27%) patients with neurologic findings before the second run died. The frequency of multiple-run ECMOs increased within the study period. Outcomes in pediatric patients with multiple ECMO runs are disheartening. Given all patients in our cohort with neurological findings before the second ECMO run died, neurological findings should be taken into consideration when determining the utility of further ECMO support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high mortality rates, pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) redeployments are frequently discussed in everyday clinical care. We aim to investigate predictors of mortality in those patients. Clinical data from a single pediatric center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with multiple ECMO runs between 2010 and 2023 were included. A total of 70 (13%) patients required multiple ECMO runs. Of those, 56 (80%) died before discharge; late mortality was 89% at a median of 1.6 (1.0-3.9) years. A total of 47 (67%) patients had neurologic findings. Only one (1%) survivor had a normal neurodevelopmental follow-up. Duration of the first ECMO run (odds ratio [OR]: 2.63, 1.08-7.96), total duration on ECMO (OR: 4.72, 1.29-23.54), neurologic findings at any time (OR: 7.94, 1.46-43.24), need for renal replacement therapy (OR: 4.79, 1.06-25.58), and lactate values correlated with late mortality. All 19 (27%) patients with neurologic findings before the second run died. The frequency of multiple-run ECMOs increased within the study period. Outcomes in pediatric patients with multiple ECMO runs are disheartening. Given all patients in our cohort with neurological findings before the second ECMO run died, neurological findings should be taken into consideration when determining the utility of further ECMO support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多次小儿体外膜氧合运行与无用论。极限是什么?
尽管死亡率很高,但儿科体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的重新部署在日常临床护理中经常被讨论。我们旨在研究这些患者的死亡率预测因素。我们对一家儿科中心的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。研究纳入了在 2010 年至 2023 年期间进行过多次 ECMO 运行的患者。共有 70 名(13%)患者需要进行多次 ECMO 运行。其中,56 人(80%)在出院前死亡;在中位 1.6(1.0-3.9)年时,晚期死亡率为 89%。共有 47 名(67%)患者出现神经系统症状。只有一名(1%)幸存者的神经发育随访正常。首次 ECMO 运行的持续时间(比值比 [OR]:2.63,1.08-7.96)、ECMO 的总持续时间(比值比:4.72,1.29-23.54)、任何时间的神经系统检查结果(比值比:7.94,1.46-43.24)、肾脏替代治疗需求(比值比:4.79,1.06-25.58)和乳酸值与晚期死亡率相关。第二次运行前出现神经症状的 19 名患者(27%)全部死亡。在研究期间,多次运行 ECMO 的频率有所增加。多次运行 ECMO 的儿科患者的结局令人沮丧。鉴于我们队列中所有在第二次 ECMO 运行前出现神经系统检查结果的患者均已死亡,在确定进一步 ECMO 支持的效用时,应将神经系统检查结果考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Impella as Bridge to Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Patients. Volume Displacement Pulsatile Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Preliminary Data From In Vitro Tests. ECMO Alone Versus ECPELLA in Patients Affected by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter EVACS Study. Three-Dimensional Bio-Printed Tubular Tissue Using Dermal Fibroblast Cells as a New Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft for Venous Replacement. Comparison of Weaning Strategies in Patients Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Exploratory Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1