Outcomes of Multiorgan Heart Transplant Between Donation After Circulatory Death and Brain Death.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002329
Toyokazu Endo, Jaimin R Trivedi, Stephanie Moore, Sheng Fu, Rohan Samson, Michele Gallo, Siddharth Pahwa, Mark S Slaughter, Erin M Schumer
{"title":"Outcomes of Multiorgan Heart Transplant Between Donation After Circulatory Death and Brain Death.","authors":"Toyokazu Endo, Jaimin R Trivedi, Stephanie Moore, Sheng Fu, Rohan Samson, Michele Gallo, Siddharth Pahwa, Mark S Slaughter, Erin M Schumer","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is insufficient data on the outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) multiorgan transplant that includes heart. The primary objective of this study is to compare the overall survival outcomes of DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) multiorgan transplants. We identified all heart transplant patients from 2019 to June of 2023 using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database who also received an additional organ (kidney, liver, and lungs). A total of 1,844 DBD and 91 DCD multiorgan transplants occurred within the study period, the majority being combined heart-kidney transplantation. More patients were listed at a higher status in the DBD group (p < 0.05) and were in the intensive care unit (ICU) before transplant (p < 0.05). Despite the higher ischemia time in the DCD group (p < 0.05), the overall unmatched survival did not differ between the two groups (p < 0.05). Within the heart-kidney transplants, the overall survival between DBD and DCD heart-kidney transplants did not differ in either unmatched or matched groups (unmatched p = 0.5, matched p = 0.5). In conclusion, the data on the outcomes of DCD multiorgan transplants are limited. Still, our analysis of the currently available data suggests that the overall survival is comparable in the DCD multiorgan transplants.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is insufficient data on the outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) multiorgan transplant that includes heart. The primary objective of this study is to compare the overall survival outcomes of DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) multiorgan transplants. We identified all heart transplant patients from 2019 to June of 2023 using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database who also received an additional organ (kidney, liver, and lungs). A total of 1,844 DBD and 91 DCD multiorgan transplants occurred within the study period, the majority being combined heart-kidney transplantation. More patients were listed at a higher status in the DBD group (p < 0.05) and were in the intensive care unit (ICU) before transplant (p < 0.05). Despite the higher ischemia time in the DCD group (p < 0.05), the overall unmatched survival did not differ between the two groups (p < 0.05). Within the heart-kidney transplants, the overall survival between DBD and DCD heart-kidney transplants did not differ in either unmatched or matched groups (unmatched p = 0.5, matched p = 0.5). In conclusion, the data on the outcomes of DCD multiorgan transplants are limited. Still, our analysis of the currently available data suggests that the overall survival is comparable in the DCD multiorgan transplants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环死亡和脑死亡后捐献多器官心脏移植的结果。
关于循环死亡(DCD)后捐献多器官移植(包括心脏)的结果,目前还没有足够的数据。本研究的主要目的是比较DCD和脑死亡后捐献(DBD)多器官移植的总体生存结果。我们利用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库确定了2019年至2023年6月期间所有接受了额外器官(肾脏、肝脏和肺)移植的心脏移植患者。在研究期间,共进行了 1844 例 DBD 和 91 例 DCD 多器官移植,其中大多数是心脏-肾脏联合移植。DBD组中有更多的患者处于较高的状态(P<0.05),并且在移植前已进入重症监护室(ICU)(P<0.05)。尽管DCD组的缺血时间较长(P < 0.05),但两组的总体未配型存活率并无差异(P < 0.05)。在心肾移植中,DBD 和 DCD 心肾移植的总存活率在未配对组和配对组中均无差异(未配对 p = 0.5,配对 p = 0.5)。总之,DCD 多器官移植的结果数据有限。不过,我们对现有数据的分析表明,DCD 多器官移植的总生存率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Impella as Bridge to Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Patients. Volume Displacement Pulsatile Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Preliminary Data From In Vitro Tests. ECMO Alone Versus ECPELLA in Patients Affected by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter EVACS Study. Three-Dimensional Bio-Printed Tubular Tissue Using Dermal Fibroblast Cells as a New Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft for Venous Replacement. Comparison of Weaning Strategies in Patients Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Exploratory Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1