Workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees: systematic review.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2024.58
Paul A Maguire, Fiona A Wilkes, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Matt Brazel, Jeffrey C L Looi
{"title":"Workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees: systematic review.","authors":"Paul A Maguire, Fiona A Wilkes, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Matt Brazel, Jeffrey C L Looi","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2024.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>We aimed to systematically review primary studies exploring workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees, including rates, forms of bullying, perpetrators and help-seeking. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase using PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criterion was primary research papers surveying or interviewing psychiatry trainees with respect to perceived workplace bullying by staff members. Exclusion criteria were secondary research papers and papers whose only focus was bullying by patients or carers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial levels of bullying were reported in all five included studies. Perpetrators were often reported to be consultants, managers or peers. Most trainees did not obtain help for bullying and harassment. All of the studies had methodological limitations.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Concerning levels of workplace bullying have been reported by psychiatric trainees in the UK and abroad. Further methodologically robust studies are required to evaluate the current levels and nature of this bullying, and strategies to prevent and manage it.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: We aimed to systematically review primary studies exploring workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees, including rates, forms of bullying, perpetrators and help-seeking. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase using PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criterion was primary research papers surveying or interviewing psychiatry trainees with respect to perceived workplace bullying by staff members. Exclusion criteria were secondary research papers and papers whose only focus was bullying by patients or carers.

Results: Substantial levels of bullying were reported in all five included studies. Perpetrators were often reported to be consultants, managers or peers. Most trainees did not obtain help for bullying and harassment. All of the studies had methodological limitations.

Clinical implications: Concerning levels of workplace bullying have been reported by psychiatric trainees in the UK and abroad. Further methodologically robust studies are required to evaluate the current levels and nature of this bullying, and strategies to prevent and manage it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神科实习生的职场欺凌:系统性综述。
目的和方法:我们旨在系统性地回顾探讨精神科受训人员在工作场所遭受欺凌的主要研究,包括欺凌率、欺凌形式、施暴者和求助情况。我们采用 PRISMA 指南检索了 Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Embase。纳入标准是调查或采访精神病学受训者对员工工作场所欺凌感知的主要研究论文。排除标准为二次研究论文和仅关注患者或护理人员欺凌行为的论文:所有五项纳入的研究都报告了严重的欺凌行为。据报道,施暴者通常是顾问、经理或同行。大多数受训人员在受到欺凌和骚扰时没有寻求帮助。所有研究都存在方法上的局限性:临床意义:英国和国外的精神科受训人员都曾报告过严重的工作场所欺凌现象。需要进一步开展方法可靠的研究,以评估当前这种欺凌的程度和性质,以及预防和管理这种欺凌的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The Royal College of Psychiatrists should become British, not Royal. Introducing medical students to cultural psychiatry: perspectives and reflections on developing and delivering an elective module. Professor Thaddeus Ulzen. Research needs of higher specialist trainees in psychiatry in Ireland: mixed methods study. Evolution and suicide: critique of the pain and brain model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1