Views from midwives and perinatal nurses on barriers and facilitators in responding to perinatal intimate partner violence in Japan: baseline interview before intervention.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11737-y
Naoko Maruyama, Shigeko Horiuchi
{"title":"Views from midwives and perinatal nurses on barriers and facilitators in responding to perinatal intimate partner violence in Japan: baseline interview before intervention.","authors":"Naoko Maruyama, Shigeko Horiuchi","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11737-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Midwives and perinatal nurses play a crucial role in responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women; however, these roles are often not performed adequately. This study aimed to identify provider-related, healthcare system, and social barriers and facilitators to IPV response from the perspective of midwives and perinatal nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews with five midwives and a nurse from perinatal care facilities in Tokyo, Japan. A framework approach was employed to analyze the interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers included inadequate knowledge about IPV and reluctance to provide support by healthcare providers. Barriers in the healthcare system included the absence of structural infrastructure for IPV response. This involved the lack of screening tool adoption, the partner's presence during interviews, and time constraints. Additionally, there was insufficient systematic and collaborative coordination within and outside the team. Another barrier was the lack of in-service training to develop IPV-related knowledge and skills. Finally, there was uncertainty about how the support at healthcare facilities impacts women's lives. Further barriers in the social system included the absence of additional reimbursement for IPV response. There was also a lack of a comprehensive approach to IPV that provides for the rehabilitation of perpetrators and care for the children of victims and a culture that discourages separation from the perpetrator. Conversely, facilitators included healthcare providers recognizing the perinatal period as an opportunity to address IPV. They also acknowledged IPV as a prevalent issue, practiced conscious self-care, and systematically collaborated within the healthcare team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasized the need for routine IPV screening in perinatal care and the importance of team-based educational interventions for healthcare providers to facilitate implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11737-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Midwives and perinatal nurses play a crucial role in responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women; however, these roles are often not performed adequately. This study aimed to identify provider-related, healthcare system, and social barriers and facilitators to IPV response from the perspective of midwives and perinatal nurses.

Methods: This qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews with five midwives and a nurse from perinatal care facilities in Tokyo, Japan. A framework approach was employed to analyze the interview transcripts.

Results: Barriers included inadequate knowledge about IPV and reluctance to provide support by healthcare providers. Barriers in the healthcare system included the absence of structural infrastructure for IPV response. This involved the lack of screening tool adoption, the partner's presence during interviews, and time constraints. Additionally, there was insufficient systematic and collaborative coordination within and outside the team. Another barrier was the lack of in-service training to develop IPV-related knowledge and skills. Finally, there was uncertainty about how the support at healthcare facilities impacts women's lives. Further barriers in the social system included the absence of additional reimbursement for IPV response. There was also a lack of a comprehensive approach to IPV that provides for the rehabilitation of perpetrators and care for the children of victims and a culture that discourages separation from the perpetrator. Conversely, facilitators included healthcare providers recognizing the perinatal period as an opportunity to address IPV. They also acknowledged IPV as a prevalent issue, practiced conscious self-care, and systematically collaborated within the healthcare team.

Conclusion: This study emphasized the need for routine IPV screening in perinatal care and the importance of team-based educational interventions for healthcare providers to facilitate implementation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士和围产期护士对应对日本围产期亲密伴侣暴力的障碍和促进因素的看法:干预前的基线访谈。
背景:助产士和围产期护士在应对针对孕妇的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)方面发挥着至关重要的作用;然而,这些作用往往没有得到充分发挥。本研究旨在从助产士和围产期护士的角度出发,找出与提供者相关的、医疗保健系统和社会对应对 IPV 的障碍和促进因素:这项定性描述性研究采用半结构式访谈法,访问了日本东京围产期护理机构的五名助产士和一名护士。采用框架法分析访谈记录:结果:障碍包括对 IPV 的认识不足以及医疗服务提供者不愿提供支持。医疗保健系统中的障碍包括缺乏应对 IPV 的结构性基础设施。这包括未采用筛查工具、访谈时伴侣不在场以及时间限制。此外,团队内外的系统性合作协调不足。另一个障碍是缺乏在职培训,以发展与 IPV 相关的知识和技能。最后,医疗机构的支持对妇女生活的影响也不确定。社会系统中的其他障碍包括没有为应对 IPV 提供额外的补偿。此外,还缺乏一种全面的方法来应对 IPV 问题,这种方法可以帮助施暴者改过自新,照顾受害者的子女,同时还缺乏一种不鼓励与施暴者分离的文化。相反,促进者包括医疗保健提供者,他们认识到围产期是解决 IPV 问题的一个机会。他们还认识到 IPV 是一个普遍存在的问题,有意识地进行自我护理,并在医疗团队内部开展系统性合作:本研究强调了在围产期护理中进行常规 IPV 筛查的必要性,以及以团队为基础对医疗服务提供者进行教育干预以促进实施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring implementation and sustainability of a community paramedicine model to reduce hospitalizations: a pragmatic randomized trial. Achieving universal health coverage with disability inclusion: a household survey analyzing healthcare access and national health insurance utilization for individuals with disabilities in Indonesia. Antimicrobial resistance and physician prescribing of antibiotics in Alberta: a qualitative exploration. Delayed medical care experiences among patients with head and neck cancers: an exploratory study using patient journey mapping. Obstetric Violence, Nurses' and midwives' perspectives and experiences: a meta-synthesis study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1