Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11650-4
Samantha Steeman, Maia R Nofal, Ibrahim Heyredin, Hailemichael Asmamaw, Assefa Tesfaye, Alex Zhuang, Natnael Gebeyehu, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Thomas G Weiser, Tihitena Negussie Mammo
{"title":"Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.","authors":"Samantha Steeman, Maia R Nofal, Ibrahim Heyredin, Hailemichael Asmamaw, Assefa Tesfaye, Alex Zhuang, Natnael Gebeyehu, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Thomas G Weiser, Tihitena Negussie Mammo","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11650-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) cautions against unnecessary prolongation of postoperative antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), however this practice is still common in many countries. This study aims to describe drivers of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prescribing and clinicians' perspectives on antibiotics resistance and stewardship in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews of 16 surgeons and nine surgical ward nurses at three academic referral hospitals in Addis Ababa. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Codes were inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability (IRR), and the codebook was consistently applied to all transcripts. Thematic analysis was performed to understand drivers of prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use in surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews revealed factors contributing to postoperative prophylactic antibiotics overprescribing, including inadequate infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, wide variability in local prescribing practices, and distrust in the applicability of WHO guidelines. Antimicrobial resistance was also identified as a major concern by staff. Barriers to improving stewardship included a lack of multidisciplinary teamwork to inform prescribing decisions, while solutions included constructing appropriate context-specific guidelines and improving evidence-based practices through input from local stakeholders, including surgeons, clinical pharmacists, and nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study participants perceived that existing evidence and guidelines did not apply in their settings due to high rates of surgical site infections and gaps in perioperative IPC practices (e.g., availability of water for handwashing, sterility breaches). These gaps were a key contributor to prophylactic antibiotic overprescribing, reinforcing the need to strengthen upstream and perioperative surgical antisepsis processes. The findings of this study underscore the importance of engaging multidisciplinary teams in strengthening antimicrobial stewardship efforts, aligning processes to achieve compliance with best practices, and the need for rigorous, contextually appropriate studies from these settings to inform policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11650-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) cautions against unnecessary prolongation of postoperative antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), however this practice is still common in many countries. This study aims to describe drivers of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prescribing and clinicians' perspectives on antibiotics resistance and stewardship in Ethiopia.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews of 16 surgeons and nine surgical ward nurses at three academic referral hospitals in Addis Ababa. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Codes were inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability (IRR), and the codebook was consistently applied to all transcripts. Thematic analysis was performed to understand drivers of prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use in surgical patients.

Results: Interviews revealed factors contributing to postoperative prophylactic antibiotics overprescribing, including inadequate infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, wide variability in local prescribing practices, and distrust in the applicability of WHO guidelines. Antimicrobial resistance was also identified as a major concern by staff. Barriers to improving stewardship included a lack of multidisciplinary teamwork to inform prescribing decisions, while solutions included constructing appropriate context-specific guidelines and improving evidence-based practices through input from local stakeholders, including surgeons, clinical pharmacists, and nurses.

Conclusions: Study participants perceived that existing evidence and guidelines did not apply in their settings due to high rates of surgical site infections and gaps in perioperative IPC practices (e.g., availability of water for handwashing, sterility breaches). These gaps were a key contributor to prophylactic antibiotic overprescribing, reinforcing the need to strengthen upstream and perioperative surgical antisepsis processes. The findings of this study underscore the importance of engaging multidisciplinary teams in strengthening antimicrobial stewardship efforts, aligning processes to achieve compliance with best practices, and the need for rigorous, contextually appropriate studies from these settings to inform policy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚术后预防性抗生素使用和耐药性的定性驱动因素。
背景:世界卫生组织(WHO)告诫人们不要不必要地延长术后使用抗生素的时间以预防手术部位感染(SSI),但这种做法在许多国家仍很普遍。本研究旨在描述埃塞俄比亚延长术后抗生素处方的驱动因素以及临床医生对抗生素耐药性和管理的看法:我们对亚的斯亚贝巴三家学术转诊医院的 16 名外科医生和 9 名手术病房护士进行了半结构化访谈。对录音进行了逐字转录和编码。两位研究人员通过归纳和反复推敲的方式得出编码,并对评分者之间的可靠性(IRR)进行了测试,编码手册被一致应用于所有记录誊本。进行主题分析以了解手术患者长期预防性使用抗生素的动因:结果:访谈揭示了导致术后预防性抗生素用药过量的因素,包括感染预防与控制(IPC)实践不足、当地处方实践差异较大以及对世界卫生组织指南适用性的不信任。抗菌药耐药性也是工作人员关注的主要问题。提高监管水平的障碍包括缺乏多学科团队合作为处方决策提供信息,而解决方案则包括制定针对具体情况的适当指南,并通过当地利益相关者(包括外科医生、临床药剂师和护士)的投入改进循证实践:研究参与者认为,由于手术部位感染率高以及围手术期 IPC 实践中的不足(如洗手用水的可用性、无菌操作等),现有的证据和指南并不适用于他们的环境。这些缺陷是导致预防性抗生素用药过量的主要原因,因此有必要加强上游和围手术期手术防腐流程。本研究的发现强调了让多学科团队参与加强抗菌药物管理、调整流程以达到最佳实践的重要性,以及在这些环境中进行严格的、适合具体情况的研究以制定相关政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Assessing connection to outpatient care among patients screening positive for previously undiagnosed diabetes in the emergency department: a combined retrospective cohort and prospective cohort survey study. Reducing healthcare access inequities in West Java through forecasting and location-allocation models. From facilitating conditions to intention to use internet hospitals among doctors: multiple mediators of perceived risk and performance expectancy. Regional differences in the level of healthcare in China. "But they are hard work": A qualitative study of the perceptions of healthcare workers in providing care to persons with disabilities in Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1